Okay, so it's not quite allowing one run in a three-game series against Montreal like they did last June, but watching Meche & Co. spin a shutout just ten days after Aaron Sele did the same to San Diego is still pretty cool. Pretty important, too, since this was a one-run game until Chacin hit the wall in the eighth. Think Meche had much of a problem with the low run support? Certainly didn't seem like it. Take notes, Franklin.
For a while, this was the Game That Fun Forgot, as Meche sat down Blue Jay after Blue Jay in unspectacular fashion while the hitters kept getting themselves out one after the other. It got interesting in the eighth, though, when the bullpen started to show signs of weakness, but a bad at bat by Eric Hinske and two vital insurance runs made for a fun and entertaining conclusion.
Before we get too far:
Nothing real out of the ordinary to see there (except for the while "winning" thing) - despite a few bumps along the way, the Mariners pretty much controlled this game, slowly easing their way to a 100% chance of winning with every out recorded. The lineup certainly didn't help anything; this one was won by the pitching staff, with only Jeff Nelson turning in a hurtful performance. Would you believe that the Mariners have won four of their last six series, and are 9-8 over that span? Hypothetically, if they were to continue this success over the rest of the season, they'd end up at 80-82, pretty much right where the consensus picked them to finish before the year. Of course, they could also just continue their 22-30 pace and finish below 70 wins, but shut up.
Biggest Contribution: Gil Meche, +46.8%
Biggest Suckfest: Adrian Beltre, -17.9%
Most Important Hit: Ibanez double play, -21.6%
Most Important Pitch: Hill double play, +11.2%
Total Contribution by Pitchers: +66.8%
Total Contribution by Hitters: -12.6%
In Gil Meche's 29 quality starts (6+ IP, 3 or fewer runs allowed) since 2003, he's put up a 2.22 K/BB ratio (129:58). In his other 37 starts, he's put up a 1.68 K/BB (133:79). It may not seem like much, but a year ago that would have been the difference between ranking 39th and 67th in the Majors among 86 qualified starters. This is why I'm a little wary of his game tonight - yeah, he looked sharp pitching into the seventh inning, tossing 70 strikes and just 44 balls, but he walked a few while making the defense do all the work behind him. This isn't how Meche has been successful in the past, and unless he's become a completely new pitcher overnight, it's not how he'll be successful in the future. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he got an ovation as he walked off the mound tonight (god knows we've been starved for such opportunities this year), but he can't do this again in five days and expect to get the same result.
On a related note, did anyone notice if Meche's curveball made the flight back from Tampa? Maybe I'm just forgetful, but I don't recall the pitch making too many appearances tonight. With better curve command, Meche could stop going to the high fastball as a strikeout pitch, which would serve the double benefit of reducing home runs allowed.
For those looking forward to more Rene Rivera in the future, brace yourselves for a lot more Borders:
Once a traditional manager like Hargrove gets the idea in his head that a catcher can help out a pitching staff, that's it, it's done - that catcher will get all kinds of playing time until something goes horribly awry. Which may not be a bad thing in this case, since Rivera's immediate offensive upside closely resembles Borders' downside, but Rivera needs to play as much as he can, and sitting on the bench won't help. This'll all be moot when the team finds a new veteran backstop in a matter of days, though.
Of course, when Hargrove and Meche go on record as saying that Borders calls a good game, what they're really saying is "Gil doesn't have a clue what to do out there without a veteran's help." After all, the pitcher always has the final call - if he doesn't like what a catcher is doing, he just shakes off sign after sign until he's satisfied. Just once, I'd like to see a pitcher meet with reporters after the game and say, "Yeah, I knew exactly what I wanted to do to every batter today; the catcher just sat back there and caught what I threw at him."
Jeremy Reed's performance tonight reminded me of that Geico "Tiny House" ad - everything's great, and you're feeling good about what you're watching, but every so often it's just not awesome. Reed fell well short of awesome tonight, but that doesn't matter. I love him, you love him, and before long, everybody else will love him.
Adrian Beltre did not break out tonight. All he did was hit a sharp single off a left-handed pitcher who can't really take advantage of the low-and-away slider weak spot as much as a righty can. In the end, it was Beltre's fourteenth 1-4-with-a-single day of the season, which is pretty remarkable when you consider that he's had exactly four at bats 31 times so far. And yes, he got his token strikeout despite the southpaw on the mound, taking an ugly hack at an outside fastball in the first.
At this point, I think Beltre can be boiled down into fitting one of three categories:
(A) He's done as an elite hitter.
(B) The gears in his head are something of a perpetual motion machine, and he'll just continue to gradually improve until he's playing his best at the end of the year.
(C) He's like a lightbulb, where everything can be in place, but nothing happens until someone flips the switch (or puts it in the microwave. Whatever).
A seems pretty unlikely, since Beltre is a 26 year old coming off an MVP-caliber season, and since he has an extended track record of success at the plate. So assuming that his career didn't go all Ben Grieve on him, we're left with two choices - B & C. So which is it going to be? Does Beltre have just one flaw that needs to be fixed, or are there several adjustments he has to make before he gets back to doing what he did in Los Angeles a year ago?
Without any unique knowledge of the situation, I have to lean towards the former - that pitch off the plate outside is the difference between 2004 Adrian Beltre and 2005 Adrian Beltre. We've seen what he can do with pitches over the plate; sometimes he drills them for singles, like he did in the eighth inning tonight, and sometimes he hits them into the upper deck, like a did a little while back. So, the key to maximizing Beltre's success is to force pitchers to throw as many strikes as possible. How do you do this? Don't swing at balls.
It sounds incredibly simple, but it's not, when you consider how fast these pitches are coming at the plate, and the upper threshold of human reaction times. However, what's actually encouraging about Beltre having the worst season of his career is that he's never had this kind of problem (at least, not to this extent) before, suggesting that he made some change during the winter that killed his offense. There are several explanations floating around the internet regarding what might have caused this change - some people call it pressure to live up to a big contract, others say that he's just over-adjusting to a suddenly healthy ankle, and the list grows from there - but the key is that all these potential explanations hint at a single reason for Beltre's struggles. While it's difficult to correct a guy's muscle memory, it's a hell of a lot easier to fix one big thing than it is to fix a bunch of small ones.
Right now, Adrian Beltre is in uncharted territory. This might be the worst slump he's ever gone through as a baseball player, at any level. What the Mariners, and specifically Baylor, need to do is get him back to where he was as the half-decent third baseman of 2001-2003. Once he gets there, then he can make the same adjustments that he made prior to the '04 season so that he can take off and reassume his rightful place as one of the most valuable players in baseball. This isn't going to be an easy change, mind you, but he's still ours through 2009, so he's got plenty of time to learn to hit as a Mariner. It's really up to him and Baylor to work out just how much of that time will be spent in the dumpster, and how much of it will be spent in the leaderboards. I am absolutely convinced that the low-and-away pitch is Beltre's big flaw, and you'd better believe that the coaching staff thinks the same thing, so if Baylor can't get him turned around this year, expect to see a new hitting coach in 2006, because there's no way that the Mariners will fall anywhere short of trying their hardest to get the biggest investment in franchise history turned around.
Bret Boone, the ultimate rally-killer and official reverser of all things good, walked up to the plate in the fourth inning with one of Beltre's bats. Instead of hitting a line drive right at someone, he did the opposite, rolling a weak ground ball right up the middle, just too far away for Hudson to make a play. Maybe we should've seen that coming.
Jeff Nelson has allowed 26 baserunners in 16.2 innings. Using him instead of JJ Putz as the primary right-handed setup man is going to blow up in Hargrove's face before long.
The Mariners are off tomorrow, resuming play Friday night against Tampa Bay.
0 recs | 10 comments
Meche's Curveball
From what I saw he actually used his curveball quite a bit..... got alot of first pitch strikes with it last night....I remember at least one K coming after a first pitch curve.... fast ball to make it 0-2... then a high fastball for the K.
His curve wasn't the huge uncontrollable curve that he's used in the past but it was much more controlled.. from what I saw.
MfaninAlaska - June 2, 2005
Re: Meche's Curveball
I need to watch some tape of the game when I get back from work. I think I'm just being forgetful, although the fact that he's throwing a modified version of his usual curve threw me off. Huh.Jeff Sullivan - June 2, 2005
I concur
I saw Meche using his curveball MORE than usual last night. In fact it really seemed like he was ONLY using the curve and the fastball, I don't recall any changes or sliders being thrown. It definitely was a modified curve though, one thrown for called strikes not swinging hacking impossible to hit strikes. Which one is better?? Well the one that can get Meche into the seventh without giving up a run I would say ;) The curve he threw last night was definitely more hittable in terms of fouling it off and/or weakly putting it in play, but it wasn't the strike out curve. Now, if Meche could throw BOTH versions in the same game? That would be awesome. Hopefully last nights game is an indication that Meche is finally ascending to golden boy status, but it is a concern that he hasn't gotten many K's this year (only ONE last night!)OBF - June 2, 2005
Re: I Concur
He started using his change up about the 5th or 6th inning more frequently.... for the first 2 times thru the lineup it was (from what I recall) strictly fastball - curveball approach.I wonder if this is also part of the Mariner pitching philosophy.... it seems to be a trend where the starters come out throwing lots of fastballs with an occasional curve until they settle in. They don't break out the 3rd pitch until later in the game, usually around the 3rd time thru the lineup if they make it that far.
It seems to me, that it would be more productive for pitchers to use all their pitches early and allow them to not only get a feel for them, but to keep the hitters guessing and off balance.
Maybe I'm just too critical of Price, but I'm not really understanding his "pitching to contact" philosophy when the results are not that great. A strikeout would be better than a ball put in play all the time, and it seems the guys that were pretty decent strikeout pitchers (Pineiro and Meche) are trying to pitch much more like Franklin and Moyer with inconsistent results.
MfaninAlaska - June 2, 2005
Re: I Concur
(If your theory is correct) I wonder if saving tertiary pitches until later in the game is a suggestion made by Price to help keep guys pitching longer - I mean, if a guy doesn't see a curveball in his first or second at bats, then it might be difficult to hit in his third, which helps the pitcher seem "fresh" in the sixth and seventh innings.Whether or not it's a good idea...well, results so far seem to indicate that it's not, but that's just a hypothesis.
Jeff Sullivan - June 2, 2005
RE: I Concur
It might work with Meche, but Franklin needs to throw as many different pitches he can. Everyone is picking up on the two or three he may throw.elsid - June 2, 2005
Re: I Concur
It is just a hypothesis... I'm not even sure if its a Price suggestion or not. It would definitely be interesting to get some opinions from different pitching coaches around the league to see what the overall consensus is ....Sure it would be nice to go to a pitch in the latter innings that would be new to the hitters, but if you've got 3 quality pitches why save one till a part of the game you might not even make it too.... wouldn't that be along the same lines as saving your best reliever for the 9th inning, when the game could be decided long before that?
I don't know if there is an actual right or wrong answer to this hypothesis.
MfaninAlaska - June 2, 2005
Re: I Concur
I'm just trying to offer a potential explanation. Really, though, I agree with you - if you have several quality pitches, use them. They'll be just as good later on.Jeff Sullivan - June 2, 2005
How far off
are we from last years pace?Mariner John - June 2, 2005
Last year
after 52 games we had 19 wins, so we are 3 games ahead of last years pace. We are on pace for 68-69 winsOBF - June 2, 2005
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.