SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

Projecting Raul Ibanez

Offense

A .1/.2/.3/.4 four-year weighting system assigns Raul a .372 wOBA*. Knocking off 5% due to age (he'll be 37 next June) drops it to .354. Marcel's projected wOBA* is .349, so we're in the right area.

Defense

I'm going to be really nice to Raul and call him a -10. In reality, it could be as bad as -15 or even -20, but I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt so that we can reasonably maximize his value.

Overall

If you run through the WAR formula, you come out with a final answer right around 1. If you call Raul a -20 defender instead of a -10, he's almost replacement level. If you go the opposite way and keep him as as -10 while bumping his offense up to, say, .365, you end up with about 1.7.

As a DH, he's between 1-2 wins.

Conclusion

On the free agent market, teams spend about $4.8m per one win. So Raul Ibanez, at his unlikely absolute very best, is about a $10m player in 2009. Meanwhile, Raul Ibanez the Marcel projection is more like a $5m player in 2009. He is then, of course, expected to continue declining in 2010 and 2011.

Rosenthal:

Is Ibanez better than Ramirez or Teixeira? Of course not. He's also five years older than Burrell and seven years older than Dunn, and hits for less power.

Still, teams love Ibanez's professionalism, and one general manager predicts he will receive a three-year deal for between $8 million and $12 million per season.

This isn't going to go well for someone.

0 recs  |  15 comments

Comments

I hope it's someone I don't like.

I wish the Angels needed a COFer.

I've already heard the Angels

as one of the 328 teams rumored to be thinking about signing IbaƱez.

Of course, this was totallylegitbaseballtrademyths.com, but I still cringed.

That someone just might not be us!
I am doing my arbitration dance
It's not the same one you used for the talented Jose Guillen is it?
This is a complete hypothetical, but I'm just curious.

In the stunning event that we offer arb and Raul accepts, how much would we likely be on the hook for?

I'd guess somewhere around $8-$10 million?
Though I'm not sure how arbitration works with veterans like this.
This looks about right

but it’s not going to happen.

I'm aware of that.

Just a bit of curiosity. Arbitration is a mysterious thing to me. All I know is you offer it to someone and prospects start raining from the skies.

Definitely not.

I’d say the absolute worst Raul could do this offseason is something like 2 years at $8 million per.

Churchill said that he won't get any multi year offers

and he’ll end up accepting arb.

No disrespect to Churchill, but I'll eat a hat full of hats if Raul doesn't get a multiyear deal.
Phil-lies phil-lies phil-lies

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.