The Red Sox do need a right-handed hitting fourth outfielder. The name of Willie [Ballgame] continues to pop up in many quarters. He would be much cheaper and more reliable than Rocco Baldelli, whose health makes his presence questionable.
0 recs | 239 comments
Saw that earlier today.. Amazing that people think he has value.
seattlesundevil - December 8, 2008
Willie Bloomquist and Rocco Baldelli have the same skillet?
JI - December 8, 2008
Willie Bloomquist is an outfielder?
JI - December 8, 2008
The Red Sox are interested in Willie Blomquist?
JI - December 8, 2008
Pedroia needs a pillow fight buddy.
InSpokane - December 8, 2008
Darren Oliver was a Type A!?
kentroyals5 - December 8, 2008
Who's going to get flipped for Derek Lillibridge?
eponymous_coward - December 8, 2008
Javy Vazquez
JI - December 8, 2008
?
Aaron Campeau - December 8, 2008
goddammit
JI - December 8, 2008
Normally I don't even notice typos but this one was too good to pass up.
Aaron Campeau - December 8, 2008
Everyone on this site is a dick.
JI - December 8, 2008
Well you're a towel.
Slurvey - December 8, 2008
Well duh
Aaron Campeau - December 8, 2008
Not everyone.
Kirsten Schlewitz - December 8, 2008
Don't take GTE seriously
JI - December 8, 2008
GTE anmesty has well defined parameters for acceptence.
joof - December 8, 2008
Hahahahaha!
Slurvey - December 8, 2008
a good skillet is a necessity when you go fishing.
or clamming.
msb - December 8, 2008
I'm calling that skillet, black.
Matthew - December 8, 2008
JI - December 8, 2008
Oh how I missed thee Racist boy
seattlesundevil - December 8, 2008
This kid makes me smile every time i see him
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
Exact same skillset.
Both are gritty, hustle, and have the same amount of nominal mitochondrial function. The problem is that Rocco has more size and muscle, and therefore less function per unit volume. Like I said, same skillset.
abender20 - December 8, 2008
oh you wanted to evaluate their kitchen wares! Willie has far superior skillets.
abender20 - December 8, 2008
Playing around with WAR, it appears that Willie Ballgame and Yuniesky Betancourt share approximately equal value
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Quiet fool, you will kill any chance we have at trading him.
JI - December 8, 2008
Maybe we can get the Red Sox's interested in Betancourt as well?
mark sobba - December 8, 2008
They do need a Short Stop
InSpokane - December 8, 2008
No they don't
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Ok.
InSpokane - December 8, 2008
Jed Lowrie is good
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
I was going off of what a coworker said this morning. He is a complete idiot fan so assumed he knew what is was talk about.
My Ok. was me taking your word for it.
InSpokane - December 8, 2008
I really meant to say he is NOT a complete idiot fan
InSpokane - December 8, 2008
You rang?
The Typical Idiot Fan - December 8, 2008
I really don't want to believe this.
I’ve read reports that he probably won’t stick at short, but UZR thought he was good (in a tiny sample size, of course). And his BABIP was pretty high. And I have an irrational dislike of him so I don’t care what you say.
Teej - December 8, 2008
His BABIP was high because his LD was high
He’s not going to be a world wrecker or anything, but he’s a decent little shortstop.
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Stop being reasonable.
Teej - December 8, 2008
The Red Sox aren't stupid
JI - December 8, 2008
Perhaps we could offer teams a package deal
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Rec'd for the use of the word "package"
JI - December 8, 2008
,
Robert - December 8, 2008
Though their thrusting is much too slow for my taste.
JI - December 8, 2008
the point of rec's are?
(other than knowing that e-people e-love you)
abender20 - December 8, 2008
For some of us that knowledge is like a hug from the Easter Bunny.
Aaron Campeau - December 8, 2008
Mad street cred
Robert - December 8, 2008
Which you negate by your drunk and uncalled for rantings and destruction of property/merchandise
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
Once you get a certain number of recs you become a mod.
JI - December 8, 2008
A straight answer! 1/3 ain't bad from LL. Love this place.
abender20 - December 8, 2008
0/3
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
also, gullible isn't actually in the dictionary.
Little known fact.
abender20 - December 8, 2008
I see what you did there
pdb - December 8, 2008
Cash value of recs: 1/20 of one cent
so, 20 recs is a penny, 200 recs is a dime, and so on. Bonuses are paid quarterly.
pdb - December 8, 2008
Somebody owes me 68 cents
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
check's in the mail
*check may not in fact be in the mail
pdb - December 8, 2008
Yet you refuse to take my 2 cents.
Slica - December 8, 2008
If I can give Dave Cameron $15, I'll send you $0.68.
Two Rs and Two Ls - December 8, 2008
I would love to see Boom-Boom as a Red Sox.
I would attend each game hoping WFB plays CF.
mark sobba - December 8, 2008
So...
5:06pm: Cubs manager Lou Piniella asked Seattle reporters today whether Ibanez can play right field.
P Brady - December 8, 2008
Yes he can.
Slurvey - December 8, 2008
I can play QB for the cowboys, then.
P Brady - December 8, 2008
Exactly!
Slurvey - December 8, 2008
Now you're gettin it!!
seattlesundevil - December 8, 2008
Can you poorly hold field goals though?
I hear that’s a requirement for becoming a quarterback for the Cowboys is the non-ability for holding place kicks
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
Hopefully he's not asking his scouts.
Teej - December 8, 2008
Theo, Theo, Theo...
Two steps forward, fourteen steps back. Maybe you should have held on to Coco.
Wilder. - December 8, 2008
Willie doesn't suck
It’s just a funny image in my head.
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
But Coco > Willie?
Wilder. - December 8, 2008
They didn't give Coco away for free, though.
Teej - December 8, 2008
Ew.
Slica - December 8, 2008
I thought Willie had delusions of grandeur about starting in the NL.
Big Jared - December 8, 2008
JI - December 8, 2008
Of course....
Bavasi knows value when he sees it. This doesn’t seem like such a longshot after all.
Big Jared - December 8, 2008
Is Jocketty that much of a fool to sign Willie?
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
I'm sure he'd rather play for the best team in baseball if given a choice
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
I dunno
Would he take a 4th OF/bench spot on the best team or a starting job with a lesser team? He’s always seemed hell bent on getting that chance to be a real starter.
Big Jared - December 8, 2008
Ya..
WFB would leave the Mariners and win a ring on the Sox. It’s sad how predictable yet possible that is.
CKremer - December 8, 2008
What kind of deal will Rocco Baldelli get?
Edgar for Pres - December 8, 2008
A very incentive-laced one, I would imagine.
Teej - December 8, 2008
Seems like he could be a steal this offseason.
Edgar for Pres - December 8, 2008
Yes but he has tremendous collapse potential.
Aaron Campeau - December 8, 2008
Nicely played sir
i would assume that his deal wouldn’t be too bad, but as said before, laced with performance incentives
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
I'm glad someone finally got this joke.
Aaron Campeau - December 8, 2008
Yeah, I've been in class and just got home
I would have jumped on this earlier if I didn’t have an exam tonight, trust me
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
I'd love for GMZ to take a flier on Rocco.
BrianL - December 8, 2008
Slightly offtopic
but does anybody know the reasoning of A-Rod signing with the Rangers so late into the offseason
Robert - December 8, 2008
December 11?
JI - December 8, 2008
Thats what I thought
but the wikimobile says January 26th 2001
Robert - December 8, 2008
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/baseball/mlb/news/2000/12/11/rangers_arod_ap/
Billy Beane is a smart guy
JI - December 8, 2008
I want Bloomquist to get a starting job somewhere.
I want all of the Bloomquist fans to see what he would do when “given his chance to start”. It would be great to see him in Texas or with the Angels for 150 games.
It wouldn’t change anything. People see what they wanted to see.
mark sobba - December 8, 2008
Yes it would be nice to see him hitting cleanup for the Angels.
abender20 - December 8, 2008
Nah, couldn't happen.
With Willits, there’d be too much grit.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
Stupid comma.
Meant to be a period. >:(
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
What?
Nah. couldn’t happen. = Two fragments, was a good sentence before
With Willits. There’d be too much grit. = Two fragments, comma works
Corco - December 8, 2008
It works better with a comma
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Coach is just drunk
Corco - December 8, 2008
I hate the rules of grammar.
They can be so irritating. >:(
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
but you used them all correctly in this instance
even if inadvertently.
pdb - December 8, 2008
Maybe you should get better at writing
Graham MacAree - December 8, 2008
At least I don't use the British version
of English! Do you say aluminum that weird way they do?
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
What the hell are you talking about
Robert - December 8, 2008
How Graham always use the British versions of words?
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
British people speak the english that we do.
Robert - December 8, 2008
They spell words differently.
Like “Metres” instead of “Meters”, “Realise” instead of “Realize” and others.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
Please tell me you're not really this dumb
pdb - December 8, 2008
Are you saying that they don't?
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
I'm saying that of course they do
but why the fuck does it matter?
pdb - December 8, 2008
It's a bit strange.
That’s just my opinion.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
They were writing English before this country was even a concept
pdb - December 8, 2008
Yes but when you grow up learning to spell words
a certain way then it’s a bit strange to see it spelled a different way, no?
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
Not if you can get behind the idea that different cultures do things differently.
pdb - December 8, 2008
Coach just thinks that everything that doesn't fit into his incredibly narrow and off base perspective of the world is strange
Corco - December 8, 2008
Well it's just like getting used to the time difference
when you go to a different country. Your brain is so used to what you experience every day that it’s strange to experience something different.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
That makes it strange to you, not inherently strange
Corco - December 8, 2008
I think that's his point.
Not everyone has to jump all over him because of that.
BrettJMiller - December 8, 2008
Coach jumping is one of my pasttimes though :(
Corco - December 8, 2008
I don't see what the point of making the point was though
Corco - December 8, 2008
It's just Coach being Coach, that's pretty much the only explanation.
BrettJMiller - December 8, 2008
Coach being Coach means he should get jumped on
That’s the only way to make Coach amusing
Graham MacAree - December 8, 2008
Meh, I guess it used to be funny...
It just seems like LL has become “How can I say something that’s just a little bit ruder than the last comment to get a laugh.”
Yeah, Coach’s argument was stupid, and this is a typical Coach type of meltdown that has become legendary in LL lore, but maybe it’s a combination of everything here lately that makes this seem unnecessary and like people are trying to force the humor. The whole being a dick to be funny fad was fun for awhile, but it seems like it’s a bit out of control these days.
Not that this is the worst example of dickishness or anything, just seemed like as good a place as any to mention it.
BrettJMiller - December 8, 2008
You should have waited for something more flagrant
because we were actually being pretty kind to Coach.
JI - December 8, 2008
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2008/12/1/677061/first-speculation-opportun#10394719
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Brett thinks Tucker Max is funny
Brett is therefore not the arbiter of when things are funny.
Graham MacAree - December 8, 2008
Is anyone here the arbiter
Of what is or is not funny?
Sec 108 - December 8, 2008
Yes.
JI - December 8, 2008
I'd like to think so
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
That is some pride
Sec 108 - December 8, 2008
There have to be rules for everything
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
He's certainly dead on with this though
Goose - December 8, 2008
I dunno
I’ve just come to the conclusion that rather than acting like dicks to be funny, people are acting like dicks because they’re dicks.
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
That's entirely possible.
Goose - December 8, 2008
Not that I want to get into this but it's also worth pointing out that Brett was one of the first non-Graham people to start acting like a dick to others
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
Posting your comment twice seems kinda dickish.
Teej - December 8, 2008
I used "people" twice in the first one so I deleted it
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
I'm jealous of your powers.
I type too fast.
Teej - December 8, 2008
Or just because your opinion of whats funny changed doesnt mean our has.
Robert - December 8, 2008
Ok
Then what is your opinion? Is being a dick to other people funny to you?
Goose - December 8, 2008
I dunno, what do you think about this one?
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2008/7/25/579191/series-preview-seattle-mar#7630882
Don’t make a big fuss unless you have a clean record.
JI - December 8, 2008
Point taken(and I still stand by that)
I’ll rephrase:
Is being a dick to other people, for no particular reason, funny to you.
Goose - December 8, 2008
Should be a question mark there I suppose.
Goose - December 8, 2008
I can only answer by saying
it’s case by case. What’s funny is funny.
JI - December 8, 2008
True.
I’m just asking in general though.
Goose - December 8, 2008
It's sad that I haven't paid enough attention to fully understand the story here, but I get the jist
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
I wish LLLJ were actually dead
Jeff Sullivan - December 9, 2008
Their English came first
Corco - December 8, 2008
We tend to bastardize languages here.
BrianL - December 8, 2008
They invented it, we perfected it, right Coach?
After all, we have more people working on it, so it’s gotta be better.
pdb - December 8, 2008
Tell that to the lovely people in former British India
Corco - December 8, 2008
The English invented cricket, the Indians perfected it
so that’s a nice consolation prize for them.
pdb - December 8, 2008
That's true
Indian Speed Cricket is the coolest game ever
Corco - December 8, 2008
Actually...
If you believe linguistic theories, U.S. English is actually closer to the original English since colonization and isolation from other linguistic influences kept it purer…
PositivePaul - December 8, 2008
Isolation from other linguistic influences?
you mean influences like the, oh I dunno, Irish, Germans, Swedes, Jews, Chinese, Japanese, Russians, Indians, Italians, West Africans, Carribes, Cubans, Scots, Armenians, Poles, Latinos, Portuguese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Arab, Persian and some other immigrants who have come here and influenced the way American English is spoken? Yes, yes I suppose you’re right.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 8, 2008
I believe that is the English as spoken in Appalachia
msb - December 8, 2008
No they don't.
Robert - December 8, 2008
Canadians spell words funny too
That’s why our healthcare is superior and our currency is worth more.
JI - December 8, 2008
No it's not
C$1=US$.80
Corco - December 8, 2008
yeee-ouch
pdb - December 8, 2008
JI - December 8, 2008
whoops, missed the sarcasm
Corco - December 8, 2008
Maybe because he's English?
Don’t show your age so much.
pdb - December 8, 2008
Coach isn't Coach unless he's Coach
Robert - December 8, 2008
My cousin's husband is from England.
He doesn’t wrote like that.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
*Write.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
how does he wrote?
pdb - December 8, 2008
How do you not capitalize the first word in your sentence?
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
Oh snap.
pdb - December 8, 2008
He probably also uses correct verb tense
Corco - December 8, 2008
Benedict Arnold slept with George Washington.
Slica - December 8, 2008
DON'T EVER TALK THAT WAY ABOUT G-DUB
Corco - December 8, 2008
Wow O is not even close to I on the keyboard
Dewey N - December 8, 2008
Not on a British keyboard anyway.
Kirsten Schlewitz - December 8, 2008
Wait, what?
joof - December 8, 2008
Al-yoo-min-ee-um
I believe he is eluding to that.
Big Jared - December 8, 2008
He should have spelled it in British fashion then
It’s aluminium if you’re British
Corco - December 8, 2008
Never seen it spelled. Just have heard it.
Coach Owens - December 8, 2008
Alluding, since we're being pedantic
pdb - December 8, 2008
Arrraghh!
Dammit.
Big Jared - December 8, 2008
no harm no foul
pdb - December 8, 2008
So in Coach-world, not knowing how grammar works > writing properly in a common variant of English.
Ok then.
Graham MacAree - December 8, 2008
Sounds about right for Coach.
facepalm
eponymous_coward - December 8, 2008
I hope you don't have to grade papers later in your life
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
Works even better with neither
JI - December 8, 2008
It's optional there
It looks nice for separation but you don’t speak it
Corco - December 8, 2008
Nope. No comma needed.
JI - December 8, 2008
Not necessary but grammatically acceptable
Corco - December 8, 2008
Perhaps, but if you had a teacher than was paying attention they'd make you down for inserting and extraneous comma.
JI - December 8, 2008
mark
:(
JI - December 8, 2008
an
:)
Graham MacAree - December 8, 2008
"that" too
Corco - December 8, 2008
I wish I could edit comments here so I could start deliberately inserting them into JI's posts
Graham MacAree - December 8, 2008
I'm good at editing comments but I never edit my comments.
JI - December 8, 2008
I could leave more comments at USSM
but I can fix those.
So I guess you’re boned.
JI - December 8, 2008
I agree that it reads better with no comma
But I’m not sure that you’d get marked down- it’s sort of an archaic usage of the comma, one that would be indisputably acceptable about 50 years ago, but I think it’s still acceptable enough that you would not get marked down, particularly by an older teacher
Corco - December 8, 2008
You'd get marked down if you were writing in a English class
JI - December 8, 2008
On the grounds of Corco vs. Matthew, 9/22/2008
You’re correct
Corco - December 8, 2008
Legal precedent!
JI - December 8, 2008
It's hard to argue against myself
and I realized if I were arguing with you that’s essentially what I’d be doing
Corco - December 8, 2008
I want either this to happen or him to not even manage a guaranteed deal
Corco - December 8, 2008
"The name of Willie [Ballgame] continues to pop up in many quarters."
I’m pretty sure those quarters aren’t the Red Sox GM’s office, though.
eponymous_coward - December 8, 2008
I would think Scott Boras has better things to do than run around pimping Willie Bloomquist
Corco - December 8, 2008
Local press chats with Zduriencik
Hmmm… I don’t really know how I feel about the idea that Morrow starting and trading Putz may be mutually exclusive.
JY - December 8, 2008
I think he's mostly just saying that to please the media
Since they seem hellbent on him being a closer.
I’d be shocked if Morrow weren’t a starter come opening day
Corco - December 8, 2008
It's like if we somehow ended up with a rotation of Felix/Halladay/Webb/Santana/Lincecum
He’d be in the bullpen
Corco - December 8, 2008
If you believe in WPA then closers should be really valuable
I’ve been wanting a little explanation on this for a while.
Closers have high WPA because the team is able to leverage the innings a pitcher is in and since he is very good, is able to accumulate high WPA totals which makes him valuable to the team.
Starting pitchers operate in lower leverage situations but pitch many more innings so if they are above average, they too can rack up a good WPA but only the top SP can do this.
Starting pitchers can often get better “runs allowed” metrics because they pitch so many innings. If pitcher A has 220 IP and RA of 4.25 and pitcher B has 60 IP and a RA of 2.50 (with the average RA being 5), pitcher A will be 18 runs above average and pitcher B will be 17 runs above average.
If you use WPA to put a value on a player then isn’t it easier to justify making Morrow a closer. If you use “runs above average” then it is probably easier to justify using him as a starting pitcher since just looking at runs ignores the impact of leverage.
(In the discussion above a closer is defined as a very good relief pitcher used in high leverage situations. Todd Jones is not a closer. Carlos Marmol is a “closer”.)
Edgar for Pres - December 8, 2008
That's exactly why WPA is a fun way of looking at what happened during a game
but should not, not, not be used for any sort of player evaluation
Corco - December 8, 2008
Morrow may indeed be more valuable as a closer than as a starter
but for one thing, his repertoire suggests that this may not always be true, and for another, a good reliever is a lot easier to find than a good starter. So for these reasons the team owes it to itself to give Morrow as many chances to start as it can, I think.
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
If good relievers are easier to find than good starters
should WPA take this into account and control for this.
I agree with you. I’m mostly just wondering about which way is better for evaluating player contribution because not all runs are made equally. I bet the runs saved by a bullpen are probably 50% more valuable than the runs saved by a team’s defense or starting pitching. A team full of cheap relief pitching can easily be an average bullpen if you have an intelligent GM but there might be a real advantage to actually investing in great relief pitching.
Edgar for Pres - December 8, 2008
You'd just have to look at the leverage values
If I recall from memory, innings thrown by upper-level relievers tend to have ~twice the leverage of innings thrown by starters.
Jeff Sullivan - December 8, 2008
We can't really ask WPA to be something it's not.
Which is an accounting of a single game. By design, the late innings are going to be more crucial because of the limited opportunities that remain.
I can at least understand the argument that WPA helps you figure out which hitters were more “valuable” if you think that’s actually how you should vote for MVP (which many people do). Using it for pitchers doesn’t seem wise.
Teej - December 8, 2008
WPA for pitchers is totally valid (except it doesn't take into account defense)
It has more uses than just the MVP race.
Late innings are more critical but to cash in and earn high WPA you need to perform well. Relief pitchers can only take advantage of the high leverage situations if they are better than the average relief pitcher used in high leverage situations.
Edgar for Pres - December 8, 2008
Dont forget, though
That its a lot easier to find a Carlos Marmol or Pat Neshek than it is to find a James Shields or Jon Lester.
Its harder to find good solid SP than good solid RP.
CKremer - December 8, 2008
I continually hear this but I don't know if finding elite RP is much easier than elite SP
Edgar for Pres - December 8, 2008
Elite RP's are just as hard to find as Elite SP's
But it’s easier to find that stop-gap guy who will fill a role for a year or two while you either farm an elite pitcher or find one on the market
Fuzz - December 8, 2008
Zduriencik's a smart dude and a scout at heart. And Brandon Morrow is a scout's pitcher.
He’s big, he’s young and he throws in the high 90s. I can’t imagine Z looking at that dude and all his potential and deciding to put him in the bullpen. Especially if he’s trying to put together a plan for long-term success, which I think we can assume.
Teej - December 8, 2008
Hard to see Morrow's transition to being a starter not continuing at this point.
And “maybe” that changes if Putz is moved but I don’t see it happening. Wouldn’t be hard to find bullpen help.
ThundaPC - December 8, 2008
Zduriencik can't be that dumb.
I don’t know anything about baseball and I know that would be a dumb idea.
mark sobba - December 8, 2008
BAD BAD BAD
Goose - December 8, 2008
WAOOOOOGA...WAOOOOOOGA
kentroyals5 - December 8, 2008
Rotoworld
JI - December 8, 2008
ESPN
No real surprise here, but at least it’s not Anaheim.
Wilder. - December 8, 2008
Why is it important that the agent is a left-hander?
kentroyals5 - December 8, 2008
Yeah, I screwed up the editing.
Dammit!
Wilder. - December 8, 2008
I was just giving ya crap...I did laugh at the thought of them including that in the quote though.
kentroyals5 - December 8, 2008
ARGH!
Again? AGAIN? God, why do they keep fucking bringing this guy back!?
Goose - December 8, 2008
easy.
he’s a Good Clubhouse Influence™
msb - December 8, 2008
He's our Ibanez, just cheaper and without the ability to hit.
Goose - December 8, 2008
but 2006
Corco - December 8, 2008
Tony Clark's a good dude
At spring training he was the one guy who’d talk with every single fan and sign stuff for everybody. But yeah probably done as a hitter.
Nick S - December 8, 2008
I prefer to think that they're just signing him to do commercials and come up with slogans
Like this one
Goose - December 8, 2008
Worth taking a flyer on if he gets that far?
Goose - December 8, 2008
YES BOB YES!
$11M for a 4th outfielder. Wooo!
Goose - December 9, 2008
Also, K-Rod to the Mets?
Goose - December 9, 2008
Baker playing GM..
discussing trading Beltre for Delmon Young. Brilliant Geoff, just brilliant.
DarkLou - December 9, 2008
Trade Putz for Fielder?
On Steve Phillips ESPN winter meetings blog:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?name=winter_meetings_2008
The Mariners need a power hitter. The Brewers need a closer. There is speculation that the two teams are discussing a package involving J.J. Putz and Prince Fielder.
i want junior - December 9, 2008
Phillips is an idiot and that wouldn't happen in a billion years.
Aaron Campeau - December 9, 2008
But what if that billion year time period began 999,999,999 years and 364 days ago?
kentroyals5 - December 9, 2008
I don't follow.
Aaron Campeau - December 9, 2008
think
of how sad Willie would be without his thriving fanbase of 60 year old retired soccer moms. And who would they love now?!!? WHERE’S BRET BOONE?!?
outtathequestion - December 9, 2008
hmm.
Willie’s fans all seem to be middle-aged or older guys…
msb - December 10, 2008
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.