The Last Seven Games
4-3, 27 RS, 19 RA
That's some excellent run prevention, but some lousy lousy offense. They've looked terrible, but have they actually been terrible, or have they been unlucky or faced good pitching? You don't need to face good pitchers to have faced good pitching, that's important to note. Look at Miguel Batista's last start. In an effort to get a better handle on the offensive woes the last seven games, I went back through the box scores and noted some key, to me, numbers. Here's a rundown with the league average number presented in parenthesis:

-Opposing pitchers have thrown just under 62% of pitches for strikes during that span (just over 62%).
-Mariner hitters have swung at and missed at 6.34% of pitches (7.90%).
-Mariner hitters have seen 3.50 pitches/PA (3.78).
-Mariner hitter's BABIP is .260 (.294).
-Mariner hitters have put up a 49/35/16 GB/FB/LD line (46/35/19).
The Mariners haven't been facing, on average, noticeably poor control. What they have been doing is putting the bat on the ball at a better clip. That is part of what is driving the shorter at bats, but certainly not all. Seattle is definitely being more aggressive at the plate. This could be a result of a shift (or regression) in philosophy or it could be a result of pitchers getting ahead on the first pitch more often. This is what seems to be the case with Jose Lopez the last few games. He's watched the first pitch go by in his last 21 plate appearances and pitchers are already starting to groove that first pitch in there, putting him at an 0-1 hole nearly every at bat. Once in a 0-1 count, Lopez is forced to become more aggressive and, facing pitchers who aren't missing bats, this is going to result in shorter at bats.
If the hitters aren't drawing walks and also aren't missing the ball leading to strikeouts, that leaves one main result; putting the ball in play. And that's where they're getting killed right now. That .260 BABIP, a whopping 34 points below league average. Right now, that's working out to the difference of an entire hit per game, or the equivalent of about 0.8 runs/game or 5-6 runs during the total span. 32 or 33 runs would put us at 4.57-4.71 runs per game, which is respectable, projecting out to about 760 runs/season.
Is the BABIP all fluke? No. As you can see from the final point, they are hitting less line drives and in fact, their BABIP-LD% rate of .100 is only a little under the league average rate of .104. But that's not the most robust measurement and given that all the non-line drives are in the form of ground balls, you wouldn't expect to see the same penalty as if the team were getting flyball-happy.
If there's a conclusion to be drawn, it's this. The offense has looked bad this past week (it's worth noting that apparently many of them are sick), but the underlying stats suggest that they've been about half unlucky and half bad. Their approach does seem to have changed, for the worst, but it's too small a sample to say anything. Nevertheless, sign Bonds. Sign him now.
0 recs | 32 comments
Seems like we've hit an awful lot of liners right at people this week
and it’s not really helping that a few guys seemingly never have their grounders sneak through the IF.
Player – 2008 BABIP (Career)
Ichiro – .280(.358)
Johjima – .211(.280)
Wilkerson =( – .242(.316)
Ichiro and Kenji are still putting up decent LD/GB/FB numbers – close to their career averages, which would seem to suggest they’ll eventually regress, which would be very helpful for this offense
Wilkerson… his LD (SSS!!!) rate is way down, and in person, he’s looked terrible at the plate in every regard but patience. Thoughts?
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
"Sign Bonds. Sign him now."
Ah, if we only had an organization that cared more about winning than image.
The Beer Baron - April 24, 2008
We do - they're called the Sonics
and it’d be pretty hard to argue that they care about image right now… =(
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
Based on evidence
they don’t seem to care much about winning either, though.
pdb - April 24, 2008
They seem to care about winning
they’re just not very good at it. Two years from now though…
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
To be honest, they cared about winning to know when to rebuild.
Say what you want about Bennett and Stern, but Presti knows what he’s doing.
Thingray - April 24, 2008
That should be "care about winning enough to know"...
Thingray - April 24, 2008
That's what I meant though
or that they are smart enough to know how to build a team that will eventually win
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
They have two good young players already, and are going to draft high enough to add at least one more.
Unless Presti really screws up, they should have a pretty solid team wherever they end up playing.
Thingray - April 24, 2008
Yes, they really will be
although I’m still very concerned about this whole “Kevin Durant can play the two” thing. Seems like a much better use of him would be as a thin four-man, where he would be a ridiculous mismatch on offense and on D and when rebounding he could use his natural length/athleticism to alter shots and make up for how skinny he is.
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
Yeah, I'm not a huge basketball nut, but the two seems like an odd spot for him.
I keep hoping maybe it’s a temporary move to give him time to adjust to the NBA schedule without getting so beat up and worn down in the paint. Then once he adjust and adds some bulk he moves into the four or something like that.
Thingray - April 24, 2008
Overall I like this strategy
It didn’t work very well with the Clippers though.
don gato - April 24, 2008
You have to have a GM who isn't retarded for it to work.
Thingray - April 24, 2008
Well, the Clippers had a misanthropic scrooge as an owner
and they have been VERY unlucky in terms of injuries the past two seasons
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
iy did not seem like they cared about winning
InSpokane - April 24, 2008
Of course
There are clubs that care about winning that haven’t signed him yet.
ThundaPC - April 24, 2008
thank god LL's back
InSpokane - April 24, 2008
No kidding
I actually got some work done today
The Beer Baron - April 24, 2008
I got a scary amount of work done
though the thing is I am a short timer, so I’m not suppose to get things done
InSpokane - April 24, 2008
How early for bobblehead?
It didn’t seem worth making a new
diaryFanPost for this, so I’m asking on the front-page story.I have tickets for the game tomorrow. I didn’t intend to go on Ichiro bobblehead day, but that just turned out to be the day that worked out best for us.
But now that I’m going, I’m wondering if I should try to get bobbleheads after all. How early would we have to get in line to have a reasonable shot at it? Is it like 6:00? 5:00? noon? I have no idea.
iglew - April 24, 2008
I'm going tomorrow as well, Sec 237 in the Terrace Club (corporate perk).
I don’t think the gates even open until 5:30 or so, but I’d guess you’d have to line up pretty early to get a Bobblehead. People are crazy about those cheap little things.
Personally I’m not going to even try to get one. I might even get there at the last second just to make sure I don’t get stuck in the “bobble head crowd”.
Thingray - April 24, 2008
So I'm trying to figure out
if this is a new and improved Jose Lopez, or just a figment of my imagination.
I know he’s taking more pitches because he’s not swinging at the first pitch…. but is he really any better then last year or is he just having a good run with BaBIP?
2007 – .252 .284 .355 .639 (complete year)
2008 – .294 .301 .388 .689 (partial year)
.040 in batting average, but less then .020 increase in OPB and only .033 improvement in slugging.
He doesn’t really seem to have made any strides other then having gotten his batting average up higher.
MfaninAlaska - April 24, 2008
He's hitting the ball harder
But yes, I think his stats have failed, up to this point to catch up with his new approach
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
*have failed to
It’s not every day you can miss TWO words in a sentence..,
seattlebruin - April 24, 2008
His OBP is weighed down a bit by the sacrifices and productive outs.
Also, 50 points of OPS is huge.
Matthew - April 24, 2008
how do sacrifices
weigh down his OBP… they don’t count as at-bats in the statistics, so they shouldn’t have an overall effect.
50 points of OPS is huge, but it still doesn’t move him above .700, which in my book is still bad.
MfaninAlaska - April 24, 2008
OBP = (H + BB + HBP) / (AB + BB + HBP + SF)
Lopez already has five sac flies (only three all of last year), which have cost him 17 points of OBP.
Jeff Sullivan - April 24, 2008
but
the SF doesn’t count as an AB, so if it was just a Fly out where the runner didn’t score… it would be the same OBP as it would be with the SF.
for example 15 AB 0SF = 10AB 5SF
Am I right or am I missing something?
MfaninAlaska - April 24, 2008
No, you're right, I just confused myself
I choose to blame the servers for this.
However what is hurting Lopez’s OBP are the at bats (such as one last night) where he’s clearly trying to hit behind the runner rather than strike the ball hard.
Jeff Sullivan - April 24, 2008
that I can agree with
although he’s managed to get quite a few singles doing that….... he is popping up alot less this year (or at least it seems that way).
MfaninAlaska - April 24, 2008
Indeed
Jeff Sullivan - April 24, 2008
Slow, singles hitting hacktastic offenses don't score many runs?
What?
JI - April 24, 2008
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.