SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

Carlos Silva

A quick hit-and-run post during the intermission between the third and fourth overtime periods in Dallas:

2007 2008
K% 11 10
BB/HBP% 5 6
Strk% 65 64
StS% 9 9
GB% 48 45
LD% 19 18
HR/FB% 8 9
tRA 4.86 5.00

Carlos Silva has basically been the exact same pitcher in 2008 as he was in 2007, give or take a few minor little things. He's been throwing the same pitches, he's been throwing about the same speed, and he's been getting the same results. And while he definitely got a few bad breaks this afternoon, you'd be hard-pressed to find a luckier ERA than Silva's 2.79 through his first six starts. It was completely unwarranted, and while it fooled a few people into believing that he'd become a new pitcher, it was the same trick Washburn pulled a year ago, when his ERA stood at 2.64 on May 11th. And we know how that one turned out.

Carlos Silva isn't horrible. He could easily become horrible if he loses even a fraction of his command, but for now he's an innings-eater with ~average run prevention abilities, and despite what some people might've had you believe, he's not going to be anything more than that. Today was a pretty good reminder.The goods are all right, but the bads can be pretty damn ugly.

Regression, as they say, is swift.

0 recs  |  48 comments

Comments

Given that we're still tied for last place in the division

Jeff, have you had any luck trying to get the Mike Scioscia baseball-reference sponsor line scrubbed? It’s getting more embarrassing by the day.

I forgot to ask about that
I think I might like hockey.
Hockey is good

I’ve been out of it for so long though, I don’t know which team to cheer for, since Seattle has no NHL team (WHY???).

Aren't you supposed to follow the team that's closest to you geographically?

I thought that was the primary rule in fandom barring a valid exception. That’s why I’ve started to follow the Canucks! Who didn’t make the playoffs. And they’ve never won a Stanley Cup. Awesome.

Vancouver seems too far for me to consider that a home team.

I just never understood how NHL overlooked Seattle, especially when the Seattle Metropolitans won the Stanley Cup in 1919. So when your friends Seattle has only 1 championship, they actually have 2.

David Stern has decreed that Key Arena is a disreputable venue

So I guess it’ll be quite some time before the NHL comes to Seattle (or Portland). Which is something I don’t understand. How does Nashville freaking Tennessee have a hockey team and not Seattle?

It's the Key Arena

When they renovated last time, part of the deal was to make hockey friendly. That didn’t happen for a number of reasons and without an arena there will be no hockey in Seattle. Except for the T-birds

The Rose Garden is hockey friendly

But with the NHL at 30 teams (and possibly considering contraction?), I doubt the North West will be getting a team anytime soon. So uh, go NorthWest Mega City Canucks.

With DirectTV

Proximity is optional

Capitals, and M’s fan in Los angles.

I think you have it backwards

They purposely made Key Arena unfreindly to hockey because the owner at the time (not schultz), didn’t want competition for winter sports in Seattle.

The NHL can play at Qwest Field

Hockey should be played outdoors anyway. If only Seattle saw more snow.

That should be a new ule. Only outdoor hockey.
That would be Barry Ackerley

and yes, I still hold a grudge.

That's my recollection too.

But the stupidity goes deeper. The WHA wanted to place a franchise in Seattle, but Seattle, said noooo, we’re holding out for big, handsome NHL to take us to the dance.

When the WHA folded, the strong franchises jumped into bed with the NHL. Seattle almost certainly would have been one of the survivors, based on size and (then, anyway) a fairly robust hockey tradition.

That's an unfortunate outcome

but I don’t think you can blame Seattle for that one. The WHA did collapse after all.

But some of the WHA teams went on to do pretty well.

The Edmonton Oilers come to mind.

Yeah, I always forget his name
BTW, on Ackerley

Friend of mine just did a business deal with him. Said he was a true horse’s ass.

problem with this theory

is the geographic rivalry issue. What if in 2011 Seattle does get a team? Vancouver is going to become it’s natural rival. So know you have to switch from rooting for the Canucks to passionately against them.

It’s why the idea of becoming a Portland fan after Seattle leaves the NBA is ludicrous to any actual Seattle basketball fan.

Portland is a potential MLB City

I live in Oregon (no sales tax suckers) and I won’t start rooting for a MLB team when the Rose City finally gets one. I suppose I’d have to treat the Canucks the same way. All the more reason to move to Canada, I suppose.

We'll never get an MLB team

The Portland area doesn’t have enough medium-to-big businesses that will be willing to pony up for corporate seats.

That's a silly rule.

I live in Vancouver, and I’m a Calgary Flames fan.

Were you born/raised in Vancouver?

If you were, then that’s a little awkward, according to Bill Simmons.

Of course, I should be an Angels’ fan. But Griffey and Buhner were too freaking awesome.

What's hilarious is that Jackson's sidebar... he bitched about it and the Hawks met the Steelers in the Super Bowl the next year
Actually, I grew up nearer to Edmonton than anywhere else.

I had tremendous respect for the Gretzky Oilers (it’s a travesty that Glenn Anderson isn’t in the Hall of Fame), but I always supported the Flames.

I'm out of teams to root for

):<

I couldn't name more than a couple teams.

HD/widescreen does more for hockey than it does for anything else on television. I can follow action nearly as well as I can follow it at the game. I still don’t the rules, players, or the teams, but I enjoyed what I saw of the Pitt and the Dallas game today.

Come playoff time there aren't any rules to see anyway
So I was being told.
that's a bad sentence
I'm not a huge hockey fan (probably cause I was raised in WA)

but now I’m in the bay area and watched the Sharks game last night. Even though they lost it kicked a lot of ass.

Regression, as they say, is swift.

Yeah, one game. Silva doesn’t fuck around.

Only 3.8 years until the Silva contract is up.
Game over.

This is when I cry.

god yes
Was this a failed reply?
god yes
I recently reread Dave's post on how Silva is a landmine.

And a bunch of people calling him crazy for thinking Silva would get anywhere near even 8 million, let alone 10. Then Matthew called them all idiots. That was an entertaining thread.

A few more games like this and I’ll win 1.50 from like 7 people. I was worried for a minute.

ooh,

could you post that link? I love it when I’m right.

TaDOW!

http://ussmariner.com/2007/11/08/2007-free-agent-landmines/

Awww

I was hoping for more mocking by me. Oh well.

Though I did enjoy how Dave called the Lidge trade a win for Philly while everyone at BP (notable link) called it a ripoff for Houston.

Yeah, Carlos took a huge step towards that sub 90 ERA+

Another one like that and you will be looking good.

He went from 144 to 95 in that one game.

Also, I think I’m doing pretty well on my other bets, too. I bet they’d be a

Silva: "I'm not going to change anything. I'm going to keep using the exact same routine.''

I’m sure most of us were anticipating a game like this but I wonder what people who thinks he reinvented himself are thinking?

Hey, he just summed up his entire career!
Blame it on the Stats crowd.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.