Let's face it; all anyone really wants to hear about this game is how Felix did. So with that in mind...
It would be easy to glance at Felix's final line and think "okay, so he was mediocre." Four runs and four walks in six laborious innings isn't anything special, and certainly not cause for celebration. A decent start, but still a step back from his recent stretch of unparalleled awesomeness.
However, dig a little deeper and you'll find that, all things considered, he actually had a heck of a game. For one thing, the temperature at first pitch was hovering right around 100 degrees. I don't know if you've ever exerted yourself in triple-digit heat, but it's not very comfortable, and you can wear yourself out in a right proper hurry. That Felix made it all the way to 112 pitches - hitting 96 in his final at bat - is nothing short of incredible.
For another thing, the Ranger starting lineup featured six left-handed hitters, and added a seventh in Frank Catalanotto after Michael Young jammed his finger. Felix is awesome and all, but being a righty with an inconsistent changeup and occasionally spotty fastball command, lefties have always given him trouble, and they require a little more effort to retire on his part than your typical righty. So right off the bat this matchup didn't really play into his hands. The Rangers have a bitchin' offense, and given that it's predominantly opposite-handed, it can make righties want to crawl into a hole and die. Felix knew from the get-go that he'd be fighting an enemy entrenched in an elevated position.
On top of that, Arlington's a bandbox, especially when the weather's so warm. We saw a bunch of fly balls carry like a motherfucker tonight, including LaHair's home run, and Beltre's first. I don't know if those fly balls leave any other ballpark, but tonight, in Texas, in 100-degree heat, they took off. So you can understand if Felix was a little extra wary pitching around the zone.
And finally, even with all of those built-in excuses, Felix's performance just wasn't as mediocre as his pitching line would suggest. More telling than the four walks is that he threw 63% strikes - above-average - and had another eight pitches in the strike zone called balls by HP umpire Tom Hallion. He generated 12 swinging strikes, all against left-handed hitters, and whiffed six of the 29 batters he faced. And of the 19 balls the Rangers put in play, 11 were grounders and two were infield pop-ups. So the BIP distribution was right where you'd like it to be. Really, aside from a missed location here and there, it's hard to find too many things about which to complain.
Felix threw the ball well tonight. He threw 38 pitches at or above 96mph, he missed bats, he stayed around the zone, and he kept the ball on ground, and he did all of this despite having to deal with sizzling conditions in an active launchpad. I don't see any reason to be anything less than thoroughly satisfied with his performance. Thumbs up, Felix. Good to see you improve on your start against Boston. You weren't perfect, but considering the lineup and environment made for as tough a game as you'll see all season, you did a hell of a job, and I applaud you for it.
A shame about the W, though. But by now I guess you're probably used to that.
Biggest Contribution: King Awesome, +37.1%
Biggest Suckfest: Jeremy Reed, -20.2%
Most Important AB: Beltre homer, +23.0%
Most Important Pitch: Murphy DP, +18.1% (Johjima pick-off: +27.8%)
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): +4.6%
Total Contribution by Lineup: +45.4%
Total Contribution by Opposition: 0.0%
(What is this chart?)
0 recs | 149 comments
That has to be one of the crazier charts of the year.
bwhahaha
Good God could we use a player like Rico Brogna right now… >:(
JI - July 28, 2008
Certainly curvier than usual
Last Fan Of Jose Lopez - July 28, 2008
It'd be nice if Clement would start getting the results we were expecting
Last Fan Of Jose Lopez - July 28, 2008
As someone who grew up in 110 degree heat
It is oppressive hot even if you’re used to it. Walk a mile or ride a bike a couple miles and it destroys you. Shit, it can destroy you even if you’re sitting down doing nothing. I may give the Las Vegas 51’s shit for sucking, but I’ll never give them shit for their manhood, given they play a lot of games in that Vegas heat. Tucson’s Sidewinders too. Even if the sun’s going down, it’s still hot until the sun is all the way down.
Gomez - July 28, 2008
Yeah daygames in Tucson absolutely blew
Nick S - July 29, 2008
Am I
the only fucking person in the world that worries about Felix’s arm and sliders? STOP. Your curve is brutal. Your fastball is killer. Your slider is killing your arm. Nolan Ryan can tell you, as he’s said in articles I’m too lazy to find.
kevin_ess - July 28, 2008
Depends on how many of them he throws
If 1/3rd of his pitches are sliders, then yeah, I’d be worried. If he’s mixing it in every so often with his other 3 pitches, then not so much.
Gomez - July 28, 2008
100% disagree
Last Fan Of Jose Lopez - July 28, 2008
I'm not too concerned
He doesn’t throw all that many sliders anyway, really.
Jeff Sullivan - July 28, 2008
Nolan Ryan knows nothing about how injuries correlate to pitching mechanics.
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
He does know how to pound the shit out of hitters who half-assedly charge his mound
Gomez - July 29, 2008
His most worthwhile skill
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
He did strike out those 5000+ hitters
That had to take some talent.
Gomez - July 29, 2008
Sure, but I don't find it as amusing as beating the crap out of Robin Ventura
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
Robin Ventura once was traded for David Justice
Robert - July 29, 2008
Also walked 13.2% of all hitters he faced.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
It's amazing how many people ignore this.
My dad and I were talking about the best pitchers in their prime. I brought up late-90s Pedro, and he countered with Ryan. I explained that Nolan lacked good control and this hampered him but too many people are “OMG stikeouts!”
Obviously Ryan was a good pitcher with fantastic stuff, but my dad actually was comparing him to Pedro is his prime.
dbroncos31 - July 29, 2008
I'd have to know league home run rates for his period
before I could really tell how good he was because he did run a HR rate about 0.5 per 9 but in some pretty helpful parks and times.
He strikes me as an above average pitcher, nothing more, who happened to throw forever.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
He was pretty damn good after he turned 40.
JI - July 29, 2008
re: "He strikes me as an above average pitcher, nothing more, who happened to throw forever."
And that’s INCREDIBLY valuable.
People always claim that Ryan’s value was related to K’s, or just how awesome he was, and that’s wrong. But that doesn’t mean that Ryan wasn’t incredibly valuable.
Above average plus throws forever means he probably added more value than plenty of hall-of-famers. Again, this is a totally different argument, and claiming Ryan’s peak should be in the same paragraph as Pedro’s peak is lunacy, but I think the pendulum has swung a bit far the other way in regards to Nolan.
marc w - July 29, 2008
I agree.
I love Nolan Ryan because the man was an absolute freak when it came to durability. And, as JI has pointed out, he was at his best after he turned 40.
Aaron Campeau - July 29, 2008
FWIW,
I never claimed it wasn’t.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
Fangraphs to the rescue
From 1974 to 1993, Ryan posted a WPA/LI of 28.13. Since we don’t have enough data to caluculate WPA/LI from 68-73, his career totals are a bit deflated, as his ‘72 and ‘73 seasons were excellent. But even without those years, he ran a career average WPA/LI of about 1.5 per season.
+1.5 wins above average, excluding two years where he was remarkably awesome. In reality, he’s probably closer to +2.0 wins above average per year for his career.
I think Ryan gets a pretty bad rap sometimes. His career FIP is 2.96. The walks sucked, but the home run prevention and strikeouts more than made up for it.
davidcameron - July 29, 2008
WPA to evaluate a pitcher?
Aren’t you running afoul of having defense factored in?
Matthew - July 29, 2008
WPA/LI
Not WPA. They’re different.
And yes, we’d have to extract out defense if we were comparing Ryan’s value to, say, a position player, but since we’re comparing him to all pitchers (and we can make a fairly safe assumption that he didn’t have great defenses behind him for 25 consecutive years), it’s not a big enough issue to change the conclusion.
davidcameron - July 29, 2008
Fair enough.
Obviously his HR rates were clearly well above league average even in the depressed offensive era.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
I always compared Pedro to Babe Ruth.
Just to let people know I’m serious.
JI - July 29, 2008
I still can't get over the year Pedro put up a 1.74 ERA when the league avg was 5.07
291 ERA+!
Also that year he had a 13.2 K/g and a 1.5 BB/G.
Yes please.
I know ERA is very very flawed but dear God.
dbroncos31 - July 29, 2008
Actually if you quote his H/IP, BB/K from 1999-2000 you might pique their attention.
JI - July 29, 2008
Incorrect.
As Graham can attest, there’s little known correlations from mechanics to pitcher injuries. There’s no evidence that Felix’s slider is hurting his arm. Furthermore, he doesn’t throw that many sliders anyways. Finally, Felix’s fastball is not killer. Not until he learns to command it.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
Kind of obvious question then, but
so the only thing that we know contributes to pitcher injuries at this point is overuse?
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
Overuse and pitching while hurt.
There are quite a few major injuries that occur because pitchers pitched through a minor injury.
Surely, mechanics contribute to injuries. There’s just no way to tell which mechanics contribute in which way and be able to apply that to a particular individual.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
Did anyone gif that horrible Raul play?
Or the Kenji snap throw for that matter?
Smegmalicious - July 29, 2008
Hmmmmm
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
Washburn for Ankiel
dbroncos31 - July 29, 2008
LATE
JI - July 29, 2008
EARLY
(in the morning)
I posted at 6:30 AM!
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
I hope you mean at the price we're asking
Because wanting Washburn is wrong.
Gomez - July 29, 2008
Not when the alternative is Joel Piniero.
JI - July 29, 2008
DO. NOT. WANT.
Gomez - July 29, 2008
But saving money.
JI - July 29, 2008
But PiƱiero and Washburn on the same staff for million$
Gomez - July 29, 2008
Washburn will be the new Jeff Weaver.
JI - July 29, 2008
With our FO doing shit like this
how on earth did the Bedard deal EVER get done?
Two Rs and Two Ls - July 29, 2008
Look what we offered.
JI - July 29, 2008
Okay, the above subthread sucks.
Everyone just stop. There’s little or no point in continuing.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
what
JI - July 29, 2008
It's gone now.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
In the spirit of getting things back on topic...
Small sample size, but Jeff Clement seems to be hitting the ball hard lately but doesn’t have a whole lot to show for it. Is it just me, or has he been rather unlucky?
BrianL - July 29, 2008
extraordinarily unlucky.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
Should I be worried about the strikeouts?
BrianL - July 29, 2008
Yes
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
How worried?
Probably not too much
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
I am late and Graham is/was much more succinct
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
Yes, but not overly so.
Clement has a history of taking forever to adjust to new levels.
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
So you are saying he's slow?
kentroyals5 - July 29, 2008
Yes
But sexy.
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
True, and yet the slowness will impact his peak value and
career production.
You’ve got the sexiness, that’s big – I’m not discounting that. But maybe we need to know how much sexiness we’d trade for a given level/increment of production.
marc w - July 29, 2008
:(
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
I closed this thing and notice that something is hidden.
I hope that I am not missing a time to either defend myself or make reasonable arguments.
Kirsten Schlewitz - July 29, 2008
Nope.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
You're not
seattlebruin - July 29, 2008
Glad to hear it.
Kirsten Schlewitz - July 29, 2008
So there's 30 new comments but I don't see them.
JI - July 29, 2008
The cool people are talking.
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
Secret threads are immoral.
JI - July 29, 2008
So?
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
whoosh
JI - July 29, 2008
I told you about it already.
Kirsten Schlewitz - July 29, 2008
I've missed a ton of games recently by being out of town/drunk.
What is going on with Reed? He looked pretty good when they first called him up.
Thingray - July 29, 2008
He's gone back to being Reed
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
No power, no average, no glove?
Thingray - July 29, 2008
Reed's always had a glove.
Matthew - July 29, 2008
Dammit Matthew
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
Maybe this isn't the best place to ask this, but since you work for the guys...
can you tell me what happened to RZR between 2005 and 2006?
Jeremy Reed basically led MLB in RZR in CF in 2005, but his RZR value would basically make him the worst CF regular in baseball this year.
Or take RF – Ichiro led the league in 2005 with a .725 RZR, and was the only regular above .700. This year, NOBODY is below .800 and most are above .900. Pat Burrell’s 2008 RZR would’ve made him the #1 LF in the league in 2005 by 139 points! The top end of the scale moved like 250 points over all in LF! What the hell?
Clearly, the zones shrank, and you can see that in increased OOZ plays now. But, as far as I can tell, nothing happened to the IF zones. Is that basically right? Got a handy overview of these changes?
marc w - July 29, 2008
He's always had lots of glove
Graham MacAree - July 29, 2008
Late
JI - July 29, 2008
He always has, but I thought maybe he caught Raul-itis or something.
Thingray - July 29, 2008
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.