RRS pitched well, we gained a game on the Nationals, and Ichiro picked up three more hits, and yet for a good ten minutes after the game all I could think about was how utterly dismayed I am by Yuni's stunning regression. The man is 26 years old. 26. In theory he should just be beginning his peak. Instead he's taken a step back at the plate while simultaneously taking several more better-documented steps back in the field. It was kind of fitting that the game ended the way it did - Yuni tried to pull an unpullable pitch and grounded into a bases loaded double play he might've been able to beat out four years ago. I won't say it was "classically Yuni," since the pitch was at least within the strike zone, but it seems appropriate that one massive letdown should be directly responsible for concluding another.
I don't know what causes this sort of thing. Yuni's career has collapsed. Perhaps not irreversibly so, but as of this moment, he's a terrible all-around regular who was supposed to be so much more than that. Why? I know Tango has suggested that there might be some personal reason behind the decline of Yuni's defense, since such a phenomenon is borderline unprecedented, but lacking any sort of inside information, the whole thing is both bothersome and incredibly puzzling. Why us? Why Yuni? Why now? Players flame out all the time, but rarely do they do it at such a young age after already establishing themselves in the Major Leagues. The true story behind Yuni's career - if one exists - if it ever comes out - will either be wildly fascinating or profoundly disappointing.
But I suppose we have all offseason (and probably several more regular seasons after that) to talk about Yuni. Today was about RRS finally showcasing some legitimate talent out of the rotation. As is the case whenever anyone makes a good start against a bad offense, we need to take all the results with a grain of salt, but tonight RRS did everything he needs to do to stick as a legitimate #4/5 and, by lasting 114 pitches, even a little bit more. He threw enough strikes. He missed enough bats. He induced enough weak contact. His location - as always - could've been better, as he both missed off the plate and spent a little too much time up in the zone over it, but then nobody's asking RRS to save the rotation. That's not something for which he's cut out, and that's not his responsibility. His responsibility is to eat a handful of innings without embarrassing himself, and tonight he did what Jarrod Washburn does in his good starts, and for a fraction of the price. Hey, guess what? That's the point of the whole thing. It has been my firm belief for a while now that RRS is capable of approximating, equaling, or even slightly exceeding Jarrod Washburn's contribution for close to the league minimum. Tonight, he finally proved he can do it. Good on you, Ryan. You deserved better than you got.
One thing that does concern me is that pitch count. 114 is more pitches than RRS has thrown in a single game in years and years, and while they weren't particularly taxing, and while he wasn't struggling to maintain his velocity, I wonder if that could be a factor his next time out against Minnesota. I'm not saying anything's going to happen, but I wouldn't be too terribly surprised if he has a rougher go of it next Tuesday. Unless recent research that I've missed has indicated otherwise, I believe unusually high pitch counts have a tendency to manifest themselves in a pitcher's next start, and for Ryan, this was quite a lot of work. So it's something to watch for. But for as curious as I am to find out if/how this will affect him down the road, 114 pitches? I didn't think he had it in him. That scores points with both me AND the organization, which is a rare feat indeed.
Today I am encouraged by RRS and further discouraged by the team as a unit. I suppose things could be worse.
Biggest Contribution: RRS, +21.8%
Biggest Suckfest: Yuniesky Betancourt, -36.9%
Most Important AB: Betancourt DP, -32.0%
Most Important Pitch: Brown homer, -18.2%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): +25.8%
Total Contribution by Lineup: -75.8%
Total Contribution by Opposition: 0.0%
(What is this chart?)
0 recs | 36 comments
How often does a player score exactly 0 on a WE chart?
BrianL - August 21, 2008
It typically happens in lopsided games, with subs that appear once the game's out of hand
But Loafie’s case is pretty rare. That was weird.
Gomez - August 21, 2008
I hope Yuni recreates himself as a power hitting DH
Dewey N - August 21, 2008
Fat chance.
BrianL - August 21, 2008
I see what you did there.
Mariner John - August 21, 2008
I hope Ibanez recreates himself as a slick fielding 2B
dnc - August 21, 2008
I hope Edgar recreates himself
Gomez - August 21, 2008
Vlad clone? He's got the 'swing at everything' part down.
HARRYP09 - August 22, 2008
Ichiro has legitimate homerun power too.
Why not make him DH?
Fin - August 22, 2008
Just pathetic.
Coach Owens - August 22, 2008
So does Goggles get a song?
HARRYP09 - August 22, 2008
Already has one!
Do you come from a land down under?
Where women glow and men plunder?
Can’t you hear, can’t you hear the thunder?
You better run, you better take cover…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNT7uZf7lew
Nick S - August 22, 2008
I prefer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEAFEqxZf0w
HARRYP09 - August 22, 2008
It's too bad Hyphen couldn't of been a closer instead.
That would’ve been a sweet walk-in song.
Fin - August 22, 2008
This is my question also.
Kirsten Schlewitz - August 22, 2008
This one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGC003Xz3CY
Phil Hatzenbuehler - August 22, 2008
Jeff might go for it.
Kirsten Schlewitz - August 22, 2008
On the bright side we can still theoretically go .500 on the season
Corco - August 22, 2008
what's the point?
Well maybe for ownership to display the illusion of winning, but realistically I don’t there’s a point in doing so.
Fin - August 22, 2008
I'd rather go 6-19 to get to the magical 100-win mark for the first time since 1983.
Teej - August 22, 2008
ELEVEN MORE WINS, BOYS
pdb - August 22, 2008
you mean: 100-loss mark
vj - August 22, 2008
How about Jeremy Reed playing 1B?
I didn’t even notice Jeremy Reed was playing first till he threw the ball away. My question was why is Jeremy Reed playing first when the man standing in LF has played 135 games at 1B in his career? It’s not much experience, but it’s experience nonetheless.
Good OF=playing 1B
Bad OF=playing LF
I’m convinced they just make the moves they do because they know it’ll make us mad at this point.
BrettJMiller - August 22, 2008
Strasburg?
In seriousness, John McLaren’s spirit seems to live on in the clubhouse.
Fin - August 22, 2008
Veteranness! Raul's tenure trumps Reed, so Raul chooses where he plays
basebliman - August 22, 2008
It's funny
in September 2004 we moved Raul Ibanez to 1st to make room for Reed in the outfield
and now here we are
Corco - August 22, 2008
Bakerland
“Hi, I’m Jim Riggleman. You might remember me from such great ideas such as ‘batting Vidro fourth to protect Ibanez’.”
ThundaPC - August 22, 2008
now I'm laughing
Shawk - August 22, 2008
I love when managers refuse to use players when needed, to save them for situations that may or may not arise
And by ‘love’ I mean ‘loathe’.
Gomez - August 22, 2008
He should have double switched or put Ibanez at first.
JI - August 22, 2008
Betancourt
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/07/cuban_baseball200807?printable=true¤tPage=all
This is a long article Tom Tango had linked on his site. I have not read the whole thing yet but it is interesting, mainly about an incarcerated agent for Cuban ballplayers.
Betancourt played quite a role, apparently, and not a good one. My most favorable interpretation of his behaviour is that he may not be very intelligent.
vj - August 22, 2008
This article was posted a little while ago.
And yes, if you remember reading the part when the Cubans tend to splurge on food and gain weight and get lazy when they come up here, Yuni is the first thing that comes to mind.
Fin - August 22, 2008
Did anyone post a link to this:
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2005/11/14/122044/10
vj - August 22, 2008
Too bad Yuni wasn't playing on Cuba's Olympic team
…the US might’ve had a chance then.
ralphie81 - August 22, 2008
The U.S. is what made Yuni the player he is today.
He’d still be a thin hard working Cuban player if he had stayed.
Fin - August 22, 2008
True, he'd probably be better defensively
I think he’d be just as “free swinging” though.
ralphie81 - August 22, 2008
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.