SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

57-97, Chart

9_20_08_medium

Biggest Contribution: Bryan LaHair, +29.3%
Biggest Suckfest: Yuniesky Betancourt, -37.8%
Most Important AB: LaHair homer, +19.4%
Most Important Pitch: Bowen double, -28.2%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): -53.7%
Total Contribution by Lineup: +3.7%
Total Contribution by Opposition: 0.0%
(What is this chart?)

0 recs  |  34 comments

Comments

How did the WPA of that Valbuena 2B work?
Had to charge him for making the out

even though he was safe, that’s how the play went.

So that play was responsible for the spike up and then the dip after it?
Indeed

Double: +19.5%
Thrown out: -27.0%

Did you assign that -27 to Valbuena?
Look at the spike up and then the immediate spike down.
Had to
Could have gone to the umpire
That picture of Silva is priceless.
Actually, that is a $48 million picture.

:-/

I didn't think he could do it. But he looks heavier in high-socks
Got scalped tickets for this game.

$40 for two 5 rows back from the M’s dugout. Pretty awesome seats…game was no so.

That call looked like bullshit to everybody. Silva sucks. Betancourt sucks much more. His defense is worse than useless.

Maybe you should add another line of "Total Contribution by Umpires"??
I remember Mike Reilly getting a line of his own in the Mike Reilly game
So we have a 2.5 game lead over San Diego and a 0.5 game lead over Washington.

We may have Strasburg locked up. Washington won’t draft him and San Diego is on the verge of a winning streak. Let’s see if Morrow can draw on the powers of Felix and lose the game 2-0 tomorrow.

Washington might take him
What would be the reasoning they wouldn't?
Didn't they get burned by a Boras client this year?
They didn't sign their first rounder this year..

Aaron Crow. Therefore, the theory goes that they’d like to save some money on their first pick, so they’ll have the cash to sign the compensation pick they get from losing Crow as well.

Crow wasn't a Boras client either, BTW
Sure, but that's no guarantee of anything
I'm not saying it's set in stone.

I’m just saying that’s a popular theory that’s leading people to believe Washington won’t pick Strasburg.

But people who think in terms of "won'ts vs. might nots" are crazy.
Is it really?

I mentioned it once. I haven’t heard it anywhere else.

I don't see why you'd save money on a high pick in order to sign a lower pick.
3.5 over SD

We need WAS to start winning a few games.

Yeah...although if any team has $$ issues in signing someone it's Washington. *crosses fingers*
Washington lost Crow they would need a big signing like Strasburg.

Just to keep the fans hopes alive but that’s in my opinion. If we don’t get Strasburg Grant green looks nice…

I'm not sure people care enough-

To understand how big of a signing Strasburg would be.

Please please please learn to write properly
If I may interpret:

 Washington lost Crow [so it could be argued] they would need a big signing like [be willing to spend the required money to sign] Strasburg Just to keep the fans hopes alive but that’s in my opinion. to placate their fans. If we don’t get Strasburg[,] Grant [G]reen looks nice but that is just my opinion. [Obviously]

Deserving of a recommendation.
I encourage this.
Brings me back tot he days when I edited all my friends' papers!

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.