Let's return to happy thoughts, shall we?
Remember back before the offseason began when we were lamenting how difficult it was going to be to turn this team into a contender. That was because the team had some decent talent and lots of interesting depth, but didn't have a lot of high-upside or well above average players.
And while the team did have loads of money to spend, they were entering the winter as a ~75 win team on paper. Market value for a win acquired via free agency is about $4.25 million so spending all of our roughly $30M (p.s. Love ya, Kenji!) that way would have allowed the team to add about seven wins. In other words, we could have spent our way to about .500 baseball. Not good enough.
We know what happened instead, I won't bother re-hashing the actual moves. The thought did cross my mind today about just how much money Jack has saved the team in terms of acquiring wins though. Please note that this is not a full balance work up. Unlike Dave's post-Lee trade evaluation, I'm not going to talk about the value of the prospects we gave up, or the draft picks we've received back. For here, I am only concerned with the value into and out of the Major League roster.
Now then, the three main additions are Chone Figgins, Cliff Lee and Milton Bradley. Figgins is a 3-3.5 WAR projection offering a bit of an upgrade over what we would have figured to receive were Adrian Beltre to remain in the fold. Beltre entered free agency though, so that is not who Figgins was replacing. Rather he was usurping Jack Hannahan or Matt Tuiasosopo or some such at third base. Either one was worth about a single win, so Figgins is a 2-2.5 win upgrade.
Cliff Lee is a monster beast. He's been worth well over six wins the last two seasons and if he weren't a pitcher, I would feel comfortable putting him at six or above for 2010 as well. We don't even have to worry about the whole NL guy coming to the AL issue since the majority of his career has been in the American League. However, since he is a pitcher, I knock him down to the 5-5.5 WAR range. Thanks to the chained nature of pitching staffs, Lee knocks our worst starting pitcher, some Vargas/Fister/Olson hybrid, off. Once again, the incumbent had about one win worth of value, which makes Lee a 4-4.5 win upgrade.
Milton Bradley is the latest and not quite greatest* newcomer to the party posse. Bradley's injury and attitude issues make him a tougher bet to project forward. While he can certainly provide three to four wins, his best bet is around the 2 WAR range as our semi-permanent DH. That's not awful though since our other options at DH were excruciating, pushing the ceiling at maybe a half-win, making Bradley a solid 1-2 win upgrade.
*In terms of improvement. In terms of Not Silva, wooooooo!
Add them up and here's the facts. Lee, Figgins and Bradley are in the vicinity of 11 wins over generic replacement players and about 8-9 wins over the in-house options that they replaced. For that, their increased cost on the 2010 payroll totals $21 million*. Over the Mariner replacements, that means BlackJack Z spent about $2.5 million per win, roughly 60% of the market rate. If you want to stick to the traditional measure and compute it over league replacement, then the marginal cost drops to $1.9 million per win.
*If you want to consider Milton Bradley a $15 million increase then you also have to consider the saved roster spot from Carlos Silva going away since he departs from the Major League roster.
Jack Zduriencik arrived at the offseason, took a stroll around and cased the joint. And then he went home, booted up Photoshop, printed off some fake Half Off! stickers and robbed the place blind.
3 recs | 28 comments
It seems like adding Jeff as an author to relieve your writing load has failed
Fett42 - December 22, 2009
It's not like Jeff does front page posts anyway.
Kirk - December 22, 2009 via mobile
Nicely done.
melenious - December 22, 2009
So Mr. Zduriencik, you admit you had a plan. What do you have to say in your defence?
Mr. Zduriencik, your silence will only incriminate you further.
No Mr. Zduriencik, don’t take your anger out of me. Get back! Get back! Mr. Zduriencik noooo!
Janic - December 22, 2009
Why does he look like Dr. Bunson Honeydew?
Adam B - December 22, 2009
If we can get Blengino to make the Beeker noise at the event in January, I might squee.
Two Rs and Two Ls - December 22, 2009
As opposed to Bavasi, picking up -5 WAR through free agency and giving away our farm system.
This is just a guess, but I am sure all the suck added up was well under replacement level.
Fin - December 22, 2009
Though he did know how to build a bullpen on the super cheap...
SethGrandpa - December 22, 2009
But GMZ knows how to do that too, as well as how to steal Cliff Lee from the Phillies
and somehow dump Carlos Silva for a potentially good player
seattlebruin - December 22, 2009
Thanks for this post!
kentroyals5 - December 22, 2009
Your post makes me want to re-watch Ocean's 11.
mark sobba - December 22, 2009
So far, I have read posts that compared Jack Zduriencik to a thief,
a trader, a Jedi Master, a poker player, a magician, a con artist and a ninja. My feeling is that he is all of the above, but what is beyond question is that he is fucking brilliant at his job.
Great post.
Bart's Evil Twin - December 22, 2009
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
And like that, poof. He’s gone.
The Typical Idiot Fan - December 23, 2009
I mean like Orca fat
Fett42 - December 23, 2009
Good post Matthew. I especially love "monster beast".
TrustBaseball - December 22, 2009
Definitely my favorite part.
I wish I had the ability to make that into a photoshop reality.
Craig Powers - December 22, 2009
The Morrow trade was just a move to ward off suspicion that Jack Z is a robot programmed to destroy all other MLB team.
Craig Powers - December 22, 2009
*teams.
Craig Powers - December 22, 2009
I suspect you're right. He has to make these moves sometimes
or no one will deal with him, even though they get what they want. They just know he’s generally smarter than they are so they shouldn’t want what they want, but it’s oh so hard to resist not getting what you want.
TrustBaseball - December 22, 2009
Doesn't Jack Wilson fit in with to this too?
He is about 1.5-2 wins above replacement at $5 million this year +$1 million bonus (not sure if that should count because they were going to pay it anyway). That’s $2.5-3.3 million per win, which fits right in with the rest of the moves.
Jed MC - December 23, 2009
I think you could make a case
that he should be considered a 1-1.5 WAR player. Still good but he has some downside because he can’t hit, is getting old with with injury concerns and probably is more like a 5-10 run defender and not 15 run like last year. I just see a wide variety of outcomes next year between 0-3 WAR. I think some of that risk is built into the contract so I wouldn’t say its a steal.
Edgar for Pres - December 23, 2009
In terms of roster value, your right.
But didn’t the prospects represent any value?
langer11 - December 23, 2009
Of course they did, but he did address that in his post.
Sec 108 - December 23, 2009
Thank you!
Matthew - December 23, 2009
How come Cliff Lee's press conference isn't on teh internet?
Frederick0220 - December 23, 2009
Was there a press conference?
I thought it was just a conference call because he was on vacation.
Teej - December 23, 2009
There was no press conference, but there's some audio from the phone call somewhere in the MLB.com archives.
gregrabble - December 24, 2009
Okay, that makes sense, then, Teej and Greg.
Frederick0220 - December 24, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.