Per Rosenthal on Twitter and also on Fox Sports:
The Mariners are on the verge of signing free-agent infielder Chone Figgins to a four-year contract in the $36 million range, according to a major-league source.
The two sides are "very close" to a deal, the source said — a deal that would be a serious blow to Figgins' previous team, the Angels.
More in a bit.
0 recs | 282 comments
So.....guesses as to when the Angels sign Beltre?
I’m saying on Tuesday.
Goose - December 4, 2009
Goooo San Francisco
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
This would be acceptable.
Goose - December 4, 2009
If that's the deal, I like it a lot.
lailaihei - December 4, 2009
If it's 4/36, I am really like liking this deal
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
I'm wondering how Dave is going to respond.
That is, after USSM is back from the inevitable FA signing crash.
He said Figgins made a lot of sense at 4/40. At 4/36, boy howdy.
JY - December 4, 2009
He posted that he was happy with it at 4/36
ARock - December 4, 2009
In my defense, I had already starting writing the below comment before you posted this =)
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
This is how Dave
will respond.
Jed MC - December 4, 2009
Shall I work the fill-in-the-blank for Dave Cameron now?
“Chone Figgins signed with the Mariners today for a slightly below market value contract over four years. While this costs us our first round draft selection (#18 overall), the value of that pick is more than made up with the savings on Figgins. Figgins projects to be a 3-4 win player over the first two years of the deal, and likely is getting less than market value because a large part of his value comes on defense. Good work by GMZ to target and sign an undervalued asset at a fair, below-market price”
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
I would rec this if mobiLLe didn't suck.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
I got you covered.
Fear - December 4, 2009
Annnnnnd we're green.
seattlecougar - December 4, 2009
Heh, I got most of it right!
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Great, now I'm going to need to know how to say it!
Is it Sean or Ch-(as in cheesburger)-Own?
Coach Owens - December 4, 2009
Sean
ARock - December 4, 2009
I will never call him Shawn.
Goose - December 4, 2009
It always bugged me when we played the Angels that his name was spelled wrong.
Now it can bug the OTHER TEAMS!
ARock - December 4, 2009
Forget pronouncing it right
I like pronouncing names phonetically, regardless of how they’re actually supposed to be spelled, and Chone Figgins has always been a fun one for that. Jaquizz Rodgers from Oregon State is also great material.
seattlecougar - December 4, 2009
You mean it isn't pronounced Seen Bean?
msb - December 4, 2009
Or the author of Beowulf, Seemus Heaney.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
But Jacquizz Rodgers name is pronounced EXACTLY like it's spelled...
jah-quiz rod-jers
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Jack-quiz?
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
Eh, probably closer to that
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Whizz
Jack-whizz.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
You're more literal than I am
I like Jah-qui-zee-zee, Jack-weez, Jock-whizz, etc. There’s a lot of good material there for someone a few beers in and slightly bored.
seattlecougar - December 4, 2009
Here's a handy mnemonic device:
Cheech
Chone
lemonverbena - December 4, 2009
Does this mean we're re-signing Jeff Weaver?
seattlecougar - December 4, 2009
If it was supposed to be pronouced Sean/Shawn, Shaun, it would be spelled that way.
There’s plenty of acceptable ways to spell that name. Chone is not one of them. I refuse to pronounce it any way but Chone.
I Lick Squirrels - December 4, 2009
That's just downright enlightened.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
I will also now pronounce our right fielders' name as eye-cheer-OH!
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Ken Griffey Ger.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Ichiro is a Japanese name, and as such should be given the proper Japanese pronunciation.
Chone is American, and as such has no excuse for such a pronunciation.
I Lick Squirrels - December 4, 2009
I just don't understand the rationale - his parents named him and spelled his name differently
since a name is a large part of what makes us individual people, why is it wrong to have your name spelled differently than other people who pronounce in the same way? It shows individuality and creativity by the parents, and isn’t that something we should promote more of?
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Or it shows that they're totally illiterate
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
As someone whose name has been frequently mispronounced throughout my life
I still say call the fucker CHONE
lemonverbena - December 4, 2009
It shows retardation by the parents.
If they wanted to name him Sean or one of its variants, spell it that way. His name is Chone.
I Lick Squirrels - December 4, 2009
Can't wait until there is a DaChone or LeChone.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
You have your wish, sir
Desmond DeChone Figgins
nathaniel dawson - December 4, 2009
My fuck.
I didn’t realize this.
Why wouldn’t he go with the totally badass name Desmond?
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
Chone is a variant
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
So you get a perfect score in the
White-off challenge?
Jed MC - December 4, 2009
He didn't pick his name.
Aaron Campeau - December 4, 2009
Woah, I'm tired.
First comma should be another /
I Lick Squirrels - December 4, 2009
DO IT!!!!!
Wooooooooooo!
ARock - December 4, 2009
I like it a lot
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Hopefully we can sign Harden too.
Two aces, two Ichiros.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Chone Figgins lead the league in walks last year!
Almost 5 times as many as Betancourt!
ARock - December 4, 2009
This is something that just boggles the mind
how can a guy with a <.100 ISO post such a walk rate? Insane. Even if it comes down to career norms, its still a bit hard to believe.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
Reggie Willits.
redwolf75 - December 4, 2009
Aybar and Izturis for me.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
Whoops, this was supposed to be in response to "most annoying Angel."
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
Why Izturis?
redwolf75 - December 4, 2009
Angels baseball.
And he walks too much for a slap hitter.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
YOU WILL FEEL MY WRATH FOR BESMIRCHING EYEBROWS.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Figgins was in my opinion the most annoying Angel.
That’ll make him by definition one of my favorite Mariners if we sign him.
redwolf75 - December 4, 2009
Hell yes!
royalcurve - December 4, 2009
So we have ~$15 million to play with on a starter and one or two 1B/DH types?
Woohoo!
lailaihei - December 4, 2009
It depends on how the contract is structured
For example if they pay out 7, 9, 9, 11 they we have a bit more flexibility this year. That’s the nice thing about backloading contracts.
mebpenguin - December 4, 2009
But hurts us in terms of flexibility in the future
yeah, it could be a cross-that-bridge-when-we-get-there thing, but I’d rather have a defined situation now and flexibility in the future than flexibility now and a potential albatross down the road
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Depends on what their budget is this year
nathaniel dawson - December 4, 2009
I really, really like this
Always been a fan of Figgin’s skills, but only recently have I been able to identify their actual value. I don’t think we’ll see a 6 win season, but I think 3-4 wins will be a safe bet for at least the first 2 years. Now that he has settled in at third, he is establishing himself as quite the defender, might not quite be Beltre status, but a Figgins/Wilson left side is a black hole.
edddgar - December 4, 2009
Even if he's + 5 < x < 15, that's still really outstanding
I can’t possibly hope he’ll throw up another couple +18-20 seasons with .380 wOBAs, but I would be perfectly content with a .355 wOBA and +5 defense – that’s like a 4-4.5 WAR player right there
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Potentially fills a leadoff hitter need for when/if Ichiro declines as well
To the bullpen!
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Ichiro won't decline
Duh. When our favorite android begins to need spare parts, the Romulans will take him back for a refub in the still of a warm June night.
Rachmaninoff - December 4, 2009
Well, this is going to take some getting used to
Corco - December 4, 2009
I'm with you.
InSpokane - December 4, 2009
For sure
Although I am pretty sure that most of my dislike of him was simply because of the uniform he was wearing
tootthekazoo - December 4, 2009
I hate his face.
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
I'll feel alot better about this if we trade Lopez for something that makes up for the loss of our first round draft pick.
Goose - December 4, 2009
I'll feel a lot better about this when a killer whale eats your nuts
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Yeah me too, I think.
royalcurve - December 4, 2009
I am starting to hope a killer whale eats the nuts off of the killer whale eats your nuts meme.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
I am using this meme as long as the trade Jose Lopez trade bandwagon exists
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
But thank you for implying that my meme is at least male in some way =/
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
It isn't a bandwagon though. It makes good sense.
Sec 108 - December 4, 2009
I'm only on that bandwagon if Zduriencik finds better value.
But I do want to see Lopez moved down in the lineup. He shouldn’t be batting 3rd.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
This I can objectively agree with
he’s a pretty prototypical #6 guy – not great OBP, but some pop and handle the bat decently well.
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
If by "handle" the bat, you mean swinging and fouling off pitches four feet out of the strike zone
then yes, yes he can!
Coach Owens - December 4, 2009
Hopefully that means it will only last for another week or so.
Robert - December 4, 2009
I was hoping for a concentration camp analogy meme to come from that
Like moving Lopez would be the Treblinka of terrible trades.
But, it was not to be :(
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
.
lemonverbena - December 4, 2009
I may be in the minority here but...
I’m not at all excited about this! The first time he doesn’t make the bare handed play on the slow roller, I’m going to let him have it!
RED29 - December 4, 2009
Maybe he'll play second!
Maybe =(
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Oh Red, you wouldn't be happy about anyone who would replace Beltre! Not even Evan Longoria!
Coach Owens - December 4, 2009
He would with Eva!
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
If you love it, set it free
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
And if it's meant to be, he won't sign with the Angels.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
You can love them both!
It’s possible!
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Maybe we can teach him to appeal to first
lemonverbena - December 4, 2009
I think I would puke.
InSpokane - December 4, 2009
I agree.
Fuck Chone. There’s no way he could ever stay in a game with a torn testicle.
I Lick Squirrels - December 4, 2009
Well, it's a good thing he won't be asked to.
royalcurve - December 4, 2009
This move would have been a lot more fun if this was Z's first move last offseason.
Robert - December 4, 2009
Figgins is one of my favorite non mariners.
Kirk - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Excpet he's a Mariner now.
Kirk - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Figgins is also a type A free agent
“Waves goodbye to #17 pick as it floats to the Angels”
Scrupio - December 4, 2009
18th.
Coach Owens - December 4, 2009
Still a downer giving up such a high pick to a division rival
Scrupio - December 4, 2009
That pick is nothing special...
Last time we picked that high, we wound up with Josh Fields. Woo-friggin-hoo! Plus assuming Beltre rejects arb, we still get a supplemental rounder, which is only a few slots below anyway.
basebliman - December 4, 2009
I wouldn't take that to mean the #18 pick sucks.
waldo rojas - December 4, 2009
While I agree that the pick isn't all that much to get worked out about,
you can’t justify losing the pick by getting the pick for Beltre. We’d have Beltre’s pick either way.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Replacing the #18 pick with Figgins is a pretty good swap, I'd say.
basebliman - December 4, 2009
Unless we had signed Beltre
And if we didn’t we probably wouldn’t have found production equal to either of them elsewhere.
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Just because we did something stupid with a mid-first rounder last time doesn't mean that an entirely different group of people will do something stupid with it this time
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
It was Zduriencik
that signed Fields, you know.
nathaniel dawson - December 5, 2009
"That pick is nothing special... Last time we picked that high, we wound up with Josh Fields."
it was Bavasi and Fontaine who picked Fields, you know
seattlebruin - December 6, 2009
Figgins is worth it
Zduriencik has made a career off of intelligent draft picks, but he definitely sold his case that picking up a known commodity as opposed to what we get at 18, who has a good chance of falling flat on their face.
I think the quantity of our early picks last season made this pick even more expendable. The chances of picking up the quality that Figgins will produce during the 4 year contract with the 18th pick are extremely slim. That’s not to mean there won’t be quality players available at 18, but Figgins is worth forfeiting the chance to reap those benefits.
edddgar - December 4, 2009
Ugh, and Gregg Zaun is a Brewer
from an irrational fan perspective, today has been a horrible day for me
Corco - December 4, 2009
But we are getting better in the "slightly askew cap" department!
Coach Owens - December 4, 2009
That's not a consolation
Corco - December 4, 2009
Isn't it?
Coach Owens - December 4, 2009
It is indeed a sad day for xenophobes.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
So... WOOOHOOO CHONE FIGGINS BABY
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Not so fast says Rotoworld
Goose - December 4, 2009
32 for 4? Even better.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
He's going to be paying the M's to play at this rate.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
If he can stay around that rate, wow.
JY - December 4, 2009
Those are wildly different offers
Not exactly “hanging around” when you’re offering a year less
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Haha I was thinking the same exact thing.
Zwakamatsu - December 4, 2009
Same price per years, though.
They could easily extend their offer out another season.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
That's not really that easy of a thing to do
Another year and another 8mil is a lot to add to an offer.
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Fuck yeah
if were in the lead with a 4/32 offer then great. I mean, its not like we’re getting Chipper Jones or anything but he’d fill a big need for a few years and can move when someone else comes along. Sweet.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
The positional flexibility is one of the things that sells me on it.
There’s no guarantee that a number of our aspiring infielders and outfielders will pan out, but the idea of having a guy who could move quite easily in the event they do and still provide solid production is rather exciting.
JY - December 4, 2009
If Bill Hall can get any of his swing back Wakamatsu is going to have a ball next year filling out lineup cards.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
Pick from a hat!
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Random lineup generator.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
COMPUTER SAYS:
ROB JOHNSON : CENTER FIELD
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Griffey for short
abender20 - December 4, 2009
I hope it plays a MIDI price is right loser song too when it does that
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Heyman now saying it's very close
Rudy4three - December 4, 2009
Well that makes me think it's far
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Was about to say
Who’s the idiot: Heyman for being an idiot, or me for consistently reading the idiot’s work?
cwel87 - December 4, 2009
Haha, yeah, but when all these guys are saying it's close, you have to feel pretty good
Rudy4three - December 4, 2009
I'm embarrassed
that Heyman and I share the same alma mater.
Dave Clapper - December 4, 2009
Its still not totally clear to me why we'd rather have a 4 yr deal with FIggins compared to a shorter term deal
with Beltre.
Edgar for Pres - December 4, 2009
Beltre would be more expensive
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
And Beltre isn't going to sign a short-term deal.
If he is willing, he would accept arbitration and try to negotiate out two or three years before the hearing.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
Couldn't have said it any better
even if we get him, it would be three years of Beltre for the price of four years of Figgins, who is a better fit for the team anyway
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Beltre probably doesn't want to stay and he wants at least 3 years too
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
They are about equally valuable
but the way Chone gets his value fits better into the team Zduriencik is trying to build, or so it seems.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
For 4/36, I'm feeling somewhat decent about this
I’d like some home runs on our roster, though. Stat.
cwel87 - December 4, 2009
Runs is runs
abender20 - December 4, 2009
But it's a little easier to score when you can hit the ball over the fence
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Sure, but it's not like Zimmerman is on the market
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Not to mention, a little diversity helps.
InSpokane - December 4, 2009
Chone adds diversity
abender20 - December 4, 2009
HA!
InSpokane - December 4, 2009
Without fireworks, home runs have lost their appeal over the years.
(increased understanding of advanced metrics have helped, too)
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
But.. but...
Funk blasts?
xero3k - December 4, 2009
Duh, clearly the answer is to bring back Ritchie Sexson
Rachmaninoff - December 4, 2009
Richie.
Sorry, that one always drives me crazy.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
mea culpa
But at least he’s not on the team :)
Rachmaninoff - December 4, 2009
Yeah, I'm not even sure how that mistake is made so often
royalcurve - December 4, 2009
Ritchie Sexon.
Mariner John - December 4, 2009
Ugh.
royalcurve - December 4, 2009
I always preferred to see it as "Ritchie Sexton"
tootthekazoo - December 4, 2009
Hearing it pronounced as Sexton was also annoying.
Mariner John - December 4, 2009
.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
[helmetthrowing.gif]
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
.
ralphie81 - December 4, 2009
I'm not speaking of home runs directly
Merely the threat of them will do at this point.
cwel87 - December 4, 2009
Yay!
Even though Figgins is everything I hate about the Angels rolled into one player. I hope he stays the annoying little pest that he’s always been.
MFAN - December 4, 2009
He walks, though.
That’s not really a stereotypical Angels thing.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Is it because he's short?
how the hell does he walk that much? I don’t get it.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
Magic!
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Fouls off about 80 strikes per at bat.
Crystal for DH - December 4, 2009
This needs to hurry up and become official already.
Goose - December 4, 2009
GOD I KNOW
I’m not getting anything done at work. This is the first interesting baseball thing to happen this winter.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
You werent excited for the Scutaro signing?
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
Ugh, watching Twitter for #mariners news...
is almost as painful as reading the comments at the Seattle Times.
mebpenguin - December 4, 2009
heyman says the M's are very close to signing him
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/mariners-on-verge-of-signing-chone-figgins.html#comments
very smart move by the M’s if this thing gets done
RaysOfHope - December 4, 2009
And now Heyman is reporting 4/$35.
BrianL - December 4, 2009
Yes yes yes. keep dropping!
Goose - December 4, 2009
4/35 according to Heyman
Says Figgins moved closer towards our 32 number
Brian Floyd - December 4, 2009
so its a done deal?
RaysOfHope - December 4, 2009
Sounds like he confirmed it without confirming it
Close but not final, I guess
Brian Floyd - December 4, 2009
.
lemonverbena - December 4, 2009
phillies are stupid
for an extra 3M a season they couldve had a much better player in Figgins
RaysOfHope - December 4, 2009
Two million!!!
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
2 million reasons why the M's are smarter than the Phillies
RaysOfHope - December 4, 2009
Two fewer years.
Aaron Campeau - December 4, 2009
Anybody got a list of Twitter feeds to follow for more updates?
I have the local beat reporters that I follow, but I don’t have many of the national guys
tootthekazoo - December 4, 2009
Yes
SI_JonHeyman, Ken_Rosenthal
Brian Floyd - December 4, 2009
Is it just me or does anyone else have mixed feelings about a 4 year deal?
Being a fan of a team who has been burned so many times by long term contracts I am somewhat gunshy of this, rational or not.
Scrupio - December 4, 2009
At 9 a year, he should cover the value of his contract pretty easily barring injury.
Good free agents wont sign short term deals, so be happy that the price is reasonable (favorable, even)
abender20 - December 4, 2009
I'm still hoping the last year is a PA based vesting option
which justifies going nearly 1M a year more than the Angels.
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
Why do we need to justify it?
abender20 - December 4, 2009
It's a good contract
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Basically what Aron said
think of it as a three-year deal in terms of value added, with a decent shot at simply freerolling the fourth year if he adds eight-nine wins in the first three
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
The final year or two he may not live up to the contract, but he won't be a Silva like
non-factor. Maybe he’ll only be 6 million dollar player in 2012 or 2013, but it’s not like this deal with hurt the franchise from being successful down the road
Rudy4three - December 4, 2009
Well, it might be a pain if he gets hurt or whatever
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
Usually, salary inflation for free agents somewhat balances out declining play
When DeChone Figgins is in the 4th year of his deal, free agents will likely be getting more, maybe $5 to 5.5 MM per win. That has the effect of making him more affordable in the future.
nathaniel dawson - December 4, 2009
The last time we signed someone to this contract it was Jarrod Washburn
Chone Figgins is much better than Jarrod Washburn
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
Since I didn't know what the fuck I was talking about when we signed Jarrod Washburn
what kind of player did he project as? 2 WAR? Less?
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
He projected as a winner with World Series experience, a ring, and some serious veteran determination.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Yes, Washburn was predictibly a 2 WAR player
So we gave 10 mil per year to a league average player. This time we’re giving 10 mil per year to a better than leage average player, potentially significantly better.
mebpenguin - December 4, 2009
I thought he was around average at the time
If I had the tools then that I did now I would have revised that down a win
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
So you would have guessed we were paying $10M/win when it was closer to $3.9M/win on the market at the time
oh Bill Bavasi, I don’t miss you
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Maybe that should have been 1.5 WAR
That was his average over the three years before he signed with us
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
Any which way it was a sucktastic deal
This one would not be.
mebpenguin - December 4, 2009
So, Beltre goes to the Angels, hangs around the magical Bobby Abreu, in that ball park, and strats hitting again?
msb - December 4, 2009
So crabby I can't type.
msb - December 4, 2009
Or Beltre goes to the Giants and Glaus or someone goes to the Angels
Please.
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Sure!
msb - December 4, 2009
Spiezio comeback tour
Bearskin Rugburn - December 4, 2009
The player who should not be named
Player A
Scrupio - December 4, 2009
.
eponymous_coward - December 4, 2009
I kinda want him to go to the Angels
Poochie - December 4, 2009
I kinda want you to get surprised sexed by King Kong
Aaron Campeau - December 5, 2009
I'm still holding out hope that Beltre stays and they put Figgins at Second.
InSpokane - December 4, 2009
Beltre on the 1 year arb deal would be too expensive.
I am hoping Chone plays 3 and we trade Lopez for value and get another 2nd baseman.
ARock - December 4, 2009
I get that, but it makes me sad.
InSpokane - December 4, 2009
So I guess Tui is fucked, then?
I Lick Squirrels - December 4, 2009
He's just being part of the family tradition
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
Promising amatuer careers followed by hilarious professional failures?
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Also, he needs to play for the A's.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Tui can go get fucked for not following in his brother's legacy while being one of the major reasons why the UW program went down the shitter.
Robert - December 4, 2009
Yeah, screw him for following his dreams
abender20 - December 4, 2009
I think one of the major reasons UW football went down the shitter is because they sucked at a lot of other positions too.
BrettJMiller - December 4, 2009
Like Head Coach
fuck
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Is it a hilarious professional failure if you never actually get more than about 4 starts?
msb - December 4, 2009
If you were taken in the second round of the draft as the QB of the future, yes
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Wouldnt that be a fail on the Raiders
msb - December 4, 2009
Not if Tui sucked and gave them no choice
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Even my massive boner for him didn't think he would go before the late 3rd round.
Robert - December 4, 2009
Well, the Raiders also picked Darrius Heyward-Bey 7th
Sebastian Janikowsi 16th overall, and caused me for the first time ever in the first two round of the NFL draft to honestly say “I have never heard of this player before right now”
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Jamarcus Russell 1st overall.
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
I forgot that they picked a kicker in the 1st round.
Thatw as much worse than Russell or Heyward-Bey.
redwolf75 - December 4, 2009
Janikowski was a once and a lifetime kicker!
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
Meh, trade him.
ARock - December 4, 2009
Not necessarily
If we move Lopez I imagine that Tui will be our 2B next year.
mebpenguin - December 4, 2009
Are we really that high on Tui's ability to make the transition to second in just one year?
in the catastrophic event that Lopez is moved, I like the idea of getting a stop-gap FA 2B more than Tui, I think.
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
My guess
Would be Tui plays 3rd, while Chone Figgins plays 2nd.
zeke5123 - December 4, 2009
It doesn't make much sense to move a guy who has learned to be a very good 3b off of third,
especially in favor of someone who hasn’t proven to be great either way.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Hannhan/Hall
Plus you see who this year’s Adam Kennedy is.
eponymous_coward - December 4, 2009
Oh yeah, forgot about Hannahan
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
But kind of like having him around as utility/insurance guy
but I guess we have Bill Hall for that too
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Well, if this leaves us with ~15 million...
You’re in pretty good shape, since what you’d need at that point is C depth, the #1 and a couple of hitters for 1B/DH. If you’re lucky, you find this year’s Branyan (since Branyan won’t be the deal he was last year).
I have a somewhat irrational desire to sign Mike Cameron, though. Because I think an OF defense with 3 CFs (Saunders as the 4th backing up) would be pretty neat. You’d probably have to play “wheel of DH”, though (rotate position players through the DH position to give them days off), and that’s not going to work with Griffey!!! on the roster.
eponymous_coward - December 4, 2009
Better then Lopez.
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
Figgins would be the #2 hitter, no?
JBell523 - December 4, 2009
Ichiro, Figgins, Guti
1, 2, 3 punch!
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
An average of all projection systems has Felix giving up 7.1 less bullshit hits this year
Fett42 - December 4, 2009
...Plus there's Figgins' defense too!
Fett42 - December 4, 2009
Bad news, guys.
Maybe this wasn’t such a great pick-up after all. Jason Churchill is saying on his blog that Figgins isn’t even worth 4/$30M. Sorry.
katal - December 4, 2009
DAMNIT. WHY GMZ WHYYYYYYYYY
abender20 - December 4, 2009
Well gosh, that settles it....
Rachmaninoff - December 4, 2009
Next thing you know, Pedro Calderon is going to be telling us that Chone Figgins OBP and defense are overrated and he's just the black WFB
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Oh, he already has.
msb - December 4, 2009
Here you go
linky
msb - December 4, 2009
Uh
this one is truly special… why does Pedro think that Chone is coming in to play second base?
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Because Lopez is as good as gone!
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
Because nobody will want to sign Beltre so he'll accept arbitration and come back from $12M
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
Everyone knows that.
msb - December 4, 2009
Oh Jason.
You came so far at one point. ESPN has retarded your learning.
Wilder. - December 4, 2009
ABORT ABORT
Brian Floyd - December 4, 2009
Churchill hasn't liked a lot of what Zduriencik has done.
JY - December 4, 2009
Which I don't get.
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
Wait what....
I just checked the thread.
JY - December 4, 2009
I think its just important for everybody to remember
that there aren’t many 35 yr old players who are worth paying $9 million a year. There are even less that have never shown any power throughout their career.
Edgar for Pres - December 4, 2009
There aren't many league average 35 year olds?
Graham MacAree - December 4, 2009
So I checked
and last year there were only 19 hitters born in 1975 or earlier who had a WAR of 2 or higher. There were only 11 that were born in 1974 or earlier. I don’t think that is very many.
Out of those 19 hitters, only 6 of them have ISO under .150 and none of them have ISO under .100.
I just think a lot of things for Chone have to keep going right for him to stay a league average player as he ages. I’m not saying its a horrible deal because it isn’t that large of a deal and he does have a lot of flexibility to fit in and fill any holes our team might have in the future. I’d probably say its a fair deal and is giving the M’s good but definitely not great value for their money.
Edgar for Pres - December 4, 2009
God that Ichiro sucks
if we were paying him $3M/year, it would be worth it though
seattlebruin - December 4, 2009
Jason's initial response to most deals is that he hates it, the player involved in overrated, the money
and terms isn’t right. Then after a couple days, he posts something like he did above. Where it’s like “Yeah, the deal isn’t so bad afterall”
Rudy4three - December 4, 2009
And in fairness, his whole deal seems to be that the M's aren't contenders in 2010, therefore
they should be doing 1 year deals and avoid paying out significant money until they are truly positioned to win
Rudy4three - December 4, 2009
That's because he is an idiot
Poochie - December 4, 2009
Well it sounds like Churchill doesn't know what the fuck that he is talking about and is making shit up as he goes along.
Robert - December 4, 2009
Where's that surprised face
OlSalty - December 4, 2009
Who the hell is Jason Churchill?
That’s not a question.
cwel87 - December 4, 2009
www.prospectinsider.com
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
It sure looks like question, what with that strange bit of punctuation at the end.
abender20 - December 4, 2009
I re-read and now I'm confused.
Scruffy Lefty - December 4, 2009
Exclamation-point yoga
tootthekazoo - December 4, 2009
Judging by his comments about Figgins
He’s an incredibly angry little man.
Jeff Nye - December 4, 2009
From @shannondrayer
“Figgins deal all but done-most likely will not be announced today however.”
Ok everyone, back to work.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
Fuck work more baseball
JY - December 4, 2009
No.
I had to come home to wait for the glazier (90 minutes late) so I have nothing better to do.
msb - December 4, 2009
So if the M's signed Lackey then we are only a Mike Scioscia away from getting a free Rally Monkey?
mark sobba - December 4, 2009
You don't have to wait.
Eyebrows - December 4, 2009 via mobile
There is no such thing as a free rally monkey.
msb - December 4, 2009
You certainly pay for it later.
JY - December 4, 2009
Like a monkey's paw?
Only there is 2 of them?
mark sobba - December 4, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.