SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

Mark Lowe Might Be In Trouble

Another day brings us more of the same:

Lowe: 1 IP, 3 H, 2 R
Aardsma: 1 IP, 2 K

On the spring, Aardsma's got 12 strikeouts and four walks in 11 innings, while Lowe comes in at two and four (with 21 hits) in 11.

Most of the time, I don't care very much about Spring Training numbers. The level of competition is all over the place, sample sizes are small, motivation is low, and many players are working on things that may sacrifice immediate success in an effort to improve long-term performance. Things like pitching to specific spots. For guys like, I dunno, Washburn or Beltre, whose jobs are secure, I couldn't give two hoots about their stats in March because they're likely just using the time to get warm and work out a few little kinks. Their numbers are meaningless.

But consider the closer competition. With a brand new coaching staff and a wide open battle, I can't imagine that the potential candidates have just been going through the motions. While I'm sure each has been working on a couple things, it's likely that they've all been trying to impress the new guys in charge in order to get greater consideration for the role, and it's with that in mind that I find Lowe's numbers alarming. Mark Lowe has presumably been trying pretty hard to succeed this month - I see no reason to believe otherwise - and he's sucked. Meanwhile, Aardsma's shined the brightest, missing bats and commanding the strike zone better than many anticipated. Lowe entered camp as the favorite to close, but if these last several weeks have been auditions, he's done nothing to earn the job.

This is not to say that Lowe is a bad pitcher, or that Aardsma is a great one. Lowe, I believe, has the most suitable closing stuff of anyone in the bullpen, with good velocity, a sharp slider, and a powerful changeup to use against lefties. But all the coaching staff has seen of him is what he's done in camp, and in camp he's been one of the worst pitchers on the roster. Barring a big turnaround on a few fronts over the last little while in Arizona, to hand Lowe the job would arguably be to concede that the role was never really open in the first place. And that doesn't seem like the kind of thing Wakamatsu would do. He's been pretty big on fostering competition ever since he got hired.

I dunno. I could be missing something. Maybe the numbers aren't indicative of the quality of stuff that Lowe and Aardsma (and others) have been throwing so far. Maybe the coaches don't care. But gun to my head, I'd say that this is a race that no longer has a clear favorite, because Mark Lowe has pitched himself out of the lead. And that's both good and bad, because on the one hand I like Aardsma and think he's done a lot to earn the job, but on the other I also want to see Lowe pitch up to his stuff. He may never have a better chance to get on the road to big money, and so far he's just thrown that opportunity away.

This is going to be awkward when Cordero gets better. I wonder if we'd get some kind of award for having four guys with ten saves.

0 recs  |  48 comments

Comments

Achievement Unlocked

Closer by committee, have four relievers each earn a minimum of 10 saves!

Lowe and Morrow have Diabetes

They have to adjust to the new grueling lifestyle of the regular season and will be fine in no time.

Aardsma should get the job for now. It’s his to lose. If not, I might understand why no one is around here for Spring Training.

Also, diabetes is an epidemic and likely caused by the food chain tampering of North American Society. Refined sugars and faking out the body with aspartame and splenda amongst other things causes provocations and serious discombulations. If Jesus were to come back, where would he start? I think he would start in Butte, Montana and judge everyone there. And cure diabetes.

Proceed.

Butte is so F'd....
Butte has the Lamplighter Grill, home of the best (kickass quality) food/$ ratio in the world by far
I don't know what to think of this.
I pondered it for a long time

and then decided to rec it, just in case it was brilliantly funny.

Chance of this being intentionally funny?

20? 30 per cent?

splenda amongst other things causes provocations and serious discombulations

this is pretty amazing.

And next hour on Coast to Coast AM

Richard Hoagland will stop by to talk about NASA’s alien coverup. Stay tuned.

This is one of the strangest comments I've ever seen
Just a vision brother, just a vision
I'm really not sure I get it

And at the same time I can imagine Jesus throwing a splitter in the hellhole that is Butte. Strange is the right word to describe that image.

Clearly he would wipe out the cornfields and create baseball diamonds in their place.
That Josh Fields signing keeps looking like a smarter move...
How good can we reasonably expect Cordero to be?
I don't think anyone can say yet

It’s never wise to expect a pitcher returning from surgery to dominate, but on the other hand, I have to appeal to the authority that is GMZ. I can’t wait to find out how Cordero pitches this summer.

I'm gonna assume GMZ was thinking "cheap with possible upside" with the signing

Rather than the M’s doing some brilliant scouting that concluded Cordero is gonna dominate. More likely they have no expectations and if he becomes solid again it’ll help the M’s and if he doesn’t it really shouldn’t hurt the M’s.

Definitely

It’s absolutely a low-risk/high-reward deal. It’s very likely that Cordero won’t be be strong enough to return to an MLB roster this year. But he if strong enough to come back, I suspect that he will also be strong enough to put in an above-average line.

I think his max upside is Julio Mateo when he was still getting Ks

but I’m biased against closers

... when I first read this, I thought it said "I'm biased against coloreds"

which in reference to Mark Lowe and in general would have been wrong on so many levels

Based on the reaction from when he signed here I would assume he would be almost allstar level
I'm still rooting for a Corcloser
It sounds like Lowe's inability to balance his blood sugars was leading to him using the pump, like Morrow-- I'm sure that all factors into their final decision as spring ends
Ugh...

The two pitchers I was most watching this spring, hoping they’d show some pretty significant leaps forward are both not doing so hot. In addition to Lowe, I’m really really concerned about Hyphen. Neither of these guys are quite right….

Totally agree on Hyphen - I'm surprised we haven't heard more about his struggles

The guy can’t even hit 90 MPH right now. The fact that he hasn’t been diagnosed with any major arm troubles this Spring shocks me.

RRS was never going to be a 90MPH guy as a starter

Last year, his ave. FB velocity was 88.7, and that’s including his 35 relief appearances (compared to 12 starts).
He threw 90 out of the pen, he doesn’t throw 90 as a starter. I don’t yet see enough that makes me think he’s torn something or frayed something else.

Lowe Down

Prospect Insider has been saying his stuff looks bad this year, and that his time frame for showing he can come back from surgery is coming close to an end. Scouts don’t think much of his stuff anymore, so I’m not sure we should keep saying that he has the best stuff for a closer. Aardsma also became good last year after adding a splitter. Does anyone remember how bad Putz was before he learned to throw a splitter?

Putz splitter wouldn't be very special if he couldn't spot his fastball
"Does anyone remember how bad Putz was before he learned to throw a splitter?"

Average?

Mark Lowe's BABIP last year was .353.

He generated a nearly 12% swinging strike rate. Mark Lowe’s stuff is fine. It’s his control that sucks. That’s not difficult to spot and I am surprised anyone would question Mark Lowe’s stuff, that would make me wary of any other judgments made by that person.

It's may well be that he's not getting good movement on his pitches

but this is also true for every pitcher in Arizona.

Isn't this were the scouts come in?

The numbers are too small and kind of crappy for any stats guy to make an inform choice. So really the scouts need to make the call of which is better at this time and who will be better going forward.

After going to Spring Training four times now, I see the games for what they are: hard practice. I am sure the teams make their final choice on a whole list of reasons. The morning practices, the off the field stuff and the afternoon practices/games all are weighted in the decisions.

Luckily for the us Jake Z is a good scout and he will have the final word.

4 guys with 10 saves should make some good trade value
maybe..

but only if you trade them while they are the closer. Four guys who were 10 for 15 in save opps and couldn’t hold the job are 4 so-so set-up men.

May we see an early call-up of Aumont this season?

I think our bullpen will take shape as the season progresses, but how frustrating might it be to have the bullpen blow several games in April and May that proves costly come September.

Highly unlikely.
Just how bad do you think this bullpen is?
I honestly don't know.

I don’t know how good it is, either. That’s why I think we may see some early season struggles, but as the season progresses everything will be fine.

It’s the first two months that have me worried.

There's no reason to waste his service time and probably end up wasting option years

If the bullpen sucks, this team probably won’t be in contention.

He doesn’t have to be added to the 40 man until the end of the ‘10 season, so there’s no reason to call him up before September 2010 unless he’s absolutely ready

Why can't you be like this more often

and less like you normally are?

It's amazing what age does to a kid...

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.