Changeups are pitches that rely mostly on deception. Ideally, when a pitcher throws a changeup, they exhibit the same arm motion as when they are throwing a fastball. The pitch itself will also come out of the pitcher's hand with roughly the same relative spin and movement as a fastball. From a pitcher's point of view, the purpose of the changeup is to scream fastball, get the hitter to commit to the coming fastball and then have the pitch come in markedly slower. It kills their timing, not only on that swing, but forces the hitter to react slower to the fastball when it does come because they have to spend a little extra time processing if it's a true fastball coming in or not.
Problems can arise though if that deception falters. Typically what causes that if the pitcher, in an effort to increase the speed gap between his fastball and changeup, slows down his arm. Major League hitters are incredibly adapt at picking up those subtle clues however and as a result are quickly able to discern that a changeup is coming. Without the deception, a changeup comes in more like a batting practice fastball with predictable results.
Keeping in mind that the main key to fooling the batter with a changeup is the speed gap between that pitch and the fastball, take a look at these yearly (2005 up to 2009) progressions for Felix Hernandez.
I am not worried about the dip in fastball speed, it's early in the season and it's prone to small sample size issues if Felix relied more on his two-seamer. I am worred however at the average gap from fastball to changeup over time: 11, 10, 9, 7, 5. Right now there's a 4.8 mph difference between Felix's average fastball and changeup. That's less than half what it used to be a few years ago.
This next part is going to be a bit simplified. I am not trying to put a pure scientific effort into this, that would take tons more effort, but instead am trying trying to illustrate a rough idea.
Based on reading around (it was surprisingly difficult to find good data on this), the average Major League swing takes about 67ms to go from parallel to 2nd base facing backward, to parallel to 2nd base facing forward. That is, the 180 degree arc during which you would assume a bat could make contact with a baseball.

In theory, because of the how swing mechanics work, the batter's ideal bat position at contact is between 90 degrees, (perfectly square) and 120 degrees or so (pulling the ball); that's the zone where his batspeed is often peaking, which is a key factor toward driving the ball further distances. The batter will attempt to time his swing so that his bat is in this zone when the pitch reaches home plate.
In practice though, batters facing a live fastball and a threat of a legitimate off speed pitch will sometimes concede the idea of pulling the fastball unless they get a good read on it. Instead, in those cases they will settle for being late on the fastball in order to increase their chances of making contact with the off speed pitch should they get fooled. This is why you can see David Aardsma pipe in 12 consecutive fastballs and the hitters are late on all of them.
The "fair zone", the angle the bat can be held and the ball kept fair, is roughly between 70 and 110 degrees on the diagram above. The reason it is not between 45 to 135 degrees (the angles of the foul lines) is due to two primary factors. First, the spin imparted on the ball in those cases will tend to cause the ball to tail or hook toward foul territory. Secondly, the ball will deflect off the bat at the same angle that it hits it (see pic to the right). Of course, this is still a crude outline of the whole process.
67 milliseconds to complete a 180-degree arc means that the bat will be traveling roughly 2.7 degrees every millisecond (it's not actually constant, but again, keeping it simple). In the 41ms of difference between a 94mph and an 85mph pitch, the average swing will cover 110 degrees, which is too big of a gap to make up unless the hitter adjusts and slows down his swing or delays the start of his upper body swing, sapping some bat speed. Instead though, Felix's changeup is only showing a 21ms difference, a period of time during which a bat will only cover 56 degrees.
That's still quite a bit, but as noted above, if the batter is conceding being late on the fastball and doesn't adjust his timing when the changeup comes, his bat is going to be near the position to yank-pull the change down the line. Felix could perfectly fool the batter in this case, getting the hitter to key on the fastball, but because the timing gap isn't large enough, the hitter could still possibly make good contact on the changeup. This is why people talk so much about fooling batters by changing speeds. As Jamie Moyer shows, it can be practically your only weapon, but it's one hell of a weapon.
Right now, Felix is losing that weapon when it comes to his changeup. It's still too early to tell if that's going to end up being a problem results-wise, but from a scouting perspective, it does not seem good. I am all for Felix varying his fastball speeds a la Jarrod Washburn, but that's assuming he can still keep hitters further off-balance with a mid-80s change in addition to his high-80s slider and low-80s curve. But if his slider, changeup and 2-seamer all start to run together on the radar gun, then Felix just has their differing movements to make batters miss. That's probably still enough for Felix to get by because he does have incredible movement, but if he can re-couple that movement with changing speeds, it's going to make everything more effective.
I'm not sure what might be causing Felix's changeup to get faster and faster, I have my concerns that even Felix might not know, but we do know that he is at least aware of it. That's an important part, that Felix recognizes it might be an issue. Now he, or the coaching staff, just needs to do the actual fixing.
7 recs | 64 comments
What effect might his still-tender ankle have on his delivery?
msb - April 27, 2009
I don't know near enough to even speculate on that
but I’m not sure it would apply in this case since his fastball speed is still fine.
Matthew - April 27, 2009
I've been wondering about the accelerating change.
The odd thing is how effective the change has remained against lefties, who normally feast on Felix’s fastballs (disclaimer – since Kalk’s Pf/x tool went down I don’t have a good way to get pitch type/result data so I’m going off memory). The season is still young, and Felix has not yet seen enough quality lefty bats to say anything conclusive, but it seems like he’d getting a lot of whiffs on it.
I thought at first that the algorithm is miscategorizing the pitch. His slider can come in at roughly the same speed, but it’s hard to imagine confusing the movement on it. The two seamer, on which Felix seems to be relying more and more, is right around the same speed at its slowest as well so it could be that. But that would suggest that Felix has abandoned the change almost entirely.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 27, 2009
http://www.brooksbaseball.net
Aaron Campeau - April 27, 2009
Huh, they don't have type/result data.
Whoops.
Aaron Campeau - April 27, 2009
I have done my own PITCHf/x pitch identification work to verify this and, yeah, it's not a mistake
Jeff Sullivan - April 27, 2009
So I'm assuming someone paid Kalk handsomely to take that down?
Teej - April 27, 2009
He has a baseball job now
Jeff Sullivan - April 27, 2009
So no
Jeff Sullivan - April 27, 2009
How do you separate an 89-90mph two seamer from a change?
The movement seems so similar.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 28, 2009
With care
but if I’m misidentifying those as changes instead of two-seamers, then as mentioned, that means he’s basically not throwing his change anymore, which isn’t the case.
I know for a fact that Felix is throwing his change harder, and that Felix is aware of it. That gives me confidence that I’ve been doing this right.
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Cool
I wasn’t questioning your methods, just wondering how you tell. In part the question has nothing to do with Felix, because I’ve been wondering all season how accurate Gameday’s pitch ID has been in general. It seems like it really struggles with guys who throw slow fastballs (like Washburn) and guys with very hard offspeed/breaking stuff (like Felix).
Bearskin Rugburn - April 28, 2009
Gameday is better now that it's taken into consideration each individual pitcher's known repertoire
but if you want better accuracy you pretty much have to do it yourself.
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Hey Jeff, what are the best resources for learning how to chart pitches?
I’m planning on driving out to Beloit, Wisconsin to watch the Mariners’ Clinton Lumberkings (A) play a game against the Beloit Snappers this June. Since I’ll be more or less behind home plate for that, I want to chart the pitches of whoever’s throwing for us (especially if Hensley, Pribanic, or Lorin are pitching). Do you simply find print off those printable pitch charts that are floating around online and do your best Gameday impression, or is there more to it than that? And what’s the best spot in the stands for to watch the pitches that you’re charting? While we’re at it, I’ll ask the same questions about charting hitters too.
Oh, and I just learned about MiLB.TV, too. Do you have that? It looks cool (only $30 for a year), but I don’t know how many games it actually covers.
Decatur - April 28, 2009
buhhhh
I haven’t charted pitches since high school, when I was given printouts and told what to do, so I don’t know what to tell you, other than it’s really easy to chart pitches from the dugout. You should try to do that.
What are you looking to keep track of? Just pitch type, or more than that?
I do not have MiLB.tv.
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Pitch type, radar gun reading,
maybe strike-zone location if I could get a good enough view (along with GB-FB, Ks, swinging strikes, etc.) – basically, anything I can think of that’s reasonably accurate and useful. This is more of a whim than anything else, but I figured I might try to make myself useful if I got the chance to see the game, since most LL readers will never see these guys until Tacoma at the earliest. I guess reading Dave Cameron and Matthew’s work charting Felix gave me the idea.
Decatur - April 28, 2009
At the Major League level we get the benefit of computers and cameras doing the charting for us
Unless you have a skilled eye, the best you’ll probably be able to do is identify fastballs and offspeed pitches. Even differentiating breaking balls and changeups can be difficult from the stands. So what I’d probably do is go with that sort of simple charting and then jot down pitch results (StC, StS, GB, etc). I wouldn’t worry about location. Too much work for too little payoff.
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Cool. Thanks Jeff.
I’ll also keep an eye on Mario Martinez and Denny Almonte if I get up there.
Decatur - April 28, 2009
If you could get a fix on Denny Almonte's plate approach for me that'd be nifty
Graham MacAree - April 28, 2009
What sorts of things could cause this sort of thing?
I know it would be pure speculation and not worth anything in regards to Felix’s specific condition, but what sorts of things have happened to other pitchers that cause their changeup speed to approach their fastball speed (as opposed to older pitchers losing mph off their fastballs)? Injury? Maturation?
I also think this might be part of Felix’s plan to throw nothing but fastballs, forever.
Gihyou - April 27, 2009
This is good stuff.
Thanks for breaking it down for n00bz like myself.
JBell523 - April 28, 2009
Has the movement on it gotten better or worse?
Fett42 - April 28, 2009
Pretty similar
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
If it has the same movement at a higher speed does that not make it harder to hit?
Fett42 - April 28, 2009
In a vacuum, sure.
As Matthew mentioned, however:
If he wanted more moving fastballs, he’d just throw a 2 seamer.
abender20 - April 28, 2009
Do they move the same way though?
Fett42 - April 28, 2009
The changeup has a little more drop
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Due to the lower velocity and not the spin, correct?
Looking through pitchFX, sinkers actually do deviate vertically (in the downward direction), while changeups act like fastballs and rise due to the mostly straight backspin. They rotate much less ferociously than fastballs, and therefore do not hang up nearly as much. The perceived drop in the changeup is therefore due to both the lessened “rising” effect of backspin as well as the prolonged effects of gravity due to a longer flight duration.
abender20 - April 28, 2009
When does
a players arm strength stop increasing, generally? Or, by what age is a pitcher generally throwing as hard as he ever will?
CKremer - April 28, 2009
I'm pretty sure fastball velocities peak at around 23-25
but I can’t remember where I read this. This is actually something i think we all wish Felix could grasp – that if fastball velo was all there was to pitching then pitcher career arcs would match hitters’ career arcs much more closely.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 28, 2009
Generally, it's earlier than that, more in the early 20s that speed peaks.
Matthew - April 28, 2009
I'd assume they've looked at consistency with his grip, as the change is so dependant on grip
could it be a physical change in his right hand? Fatter/slimmer fingers, calluses, etc.?
waldo rojas - April 28, 2009
It almost has to be the grip, right?
If both fastballs and changes have the same arm speed, all that’s really left is the grip.
abender20 - April 28, 2009
Allowed to ask how you know?
Nice work, Matthew
seattlebruin - April 28, 2009
I asked
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Asked Felix?!
EnglishMariner - April 28, 2009
Yes
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
I call bullshit
JI - April 28, 2009
I don't know what to believe anymore.
royalcurve - April 28, 2009
At this point I think anyone will believe anything Jeff says just because he's Jeff.
JI - April 28, 2009
I love the ShamWow
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
I liked ShamWow before it was cool.
Aaron Campeau - April 28, 2009
I am taking a stand against the shamwow as to not look like a LoLemming
JI - April 28, 2009
I've never actually used a ShamWow
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Why did you let BrianL steal your username and password?
seattlebruin - April 28, 2009
Boy it would be swell if Felix could get left handers out.
JI - April 28, 2009
Seems to have been more lucky than anything so far this season
Not getting as many Ks this year as last, I think.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 28, 2009
24.5 K% against last year's 20.42
Unless you just mean against lefties
Graham MacAree - April 28, 2009
I think he meant against lefties
in which case he’s down from 22% to 18%, but over a very limited sample.
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Crap you're right
This is what I get for eyeballing the splits from B-R at 1:30AM. In that case the .630 OPS against by lefties might be legit.
Unfortunately they don’t have BIP data in with the splits, and neither does Fangraphs. I’d love to see what his batted ball profile is so far this season, and if the faster change is getting different results than in years past. Fangraphs does show that Felix is so far completely owning righties this season, to the tune of 12K/9.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 28, 2009
No, you're right, he's not getting as many K's against lefties
Jeff Sullivan - April 28, 2009
Meh, a four percent drop in 56PA is pretty insignificant
I just went through his play log and checked out his BIP profile in the most painful way possible. He’s gotten 18 grounders against 7 fly balls against lefties (or 18/16 if you lump all flies and liners together). Getting over 50% GB against left handers is a recipe for dominance, considering he’s striking out 12 righties/27 outs, and I think it may explain the faster changeup he throws them.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 28, 2009
interesting...
I wonder what the average fastball/changeup speed difference is across major league pitchers?
kenshin1 - April 28, 2009
About 7-8 mph
Matthew - April 28, 2009
Actually make it more like 9mph, after looking at 2008 data which is a little cleaner.
Matthew - April 28, 2009
Out of curiosity
did this change in velocity start manifesting after he tweaked his elbow in 2007? I could have sworn I read something about him changing the way he threw his curveball after that injury. Perhaps he started doing something different with his changeup at that point as well?
BrianL - April 28, 2009
This was the best explanation of why pitch speed matters I've read
What exactly is it that causes the change to go so much more slowly then, if everything is the same? Is it (as mentioned above) the grip? I never pitched when I played, and never got high enough to where they taught this stuff, so I’ve never been quite sure.
Also, what kind of a change does Felix throw? Is it a circle or a straight?
And finally, should it be worrisome that according to Fangraphs the Slider has lost 3 mph to it? Does the speed of this pitch carry the same impact as the speed of the change?
Sorry for all the questions, but I’m doing my damnedest to get into the PitchFX stuff.
Robert Lintott - April 28, 2009
We're working with pretty small sample sizes
and velocity actually varies a lot from outing to outing. Take a look at the pitch f/x graphs at fan graphs and you will see that average FB velocity changes quite a lot. Same with sliders and all the rest. So the slow slider isn’t an issue. A high change velocity is a little weird though, which is the point of this article. I’m not too worried about any of this as long as Felix keeps his K/9 over 9, but I think it’s a little odd.
philosofool - April 28, 2009
It's the grip.
A fastball is held by just two fingers (plus thumb) and held near the tips of the fingers. Changeups are held by all four fingers and held back toward the palm.
Matthew - April 29, 2009
Love it, great walk-through.
One quibble, as this isn’t quite right:
I’m sure spin matters, but I’m not sure how to quantify it. But the problem is that even without spin a pitch thrown directly from the rubber to home plate (a simplification) that hits the bat will come off of it at the same angle it hits it. So a 45 degree bat doesn’t put the ball down the left field line (lefty hitter), it’s puts it straight out the 90 degree marker. And a bat at 135 degrees will put the ball out at 270 degrees.
So, without spin, the approximate range of angle that will keep the ball in play is from 77.5 degrees to 112.5 degrees, which is 90 degree plus/minus half of 45 degrees.
Sky Kalkman - April 29, 2009
You're right.
Updated to reflect.
Matthew - April 29, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.