2009 Mariners SP tRA for April 2009. Source StatCorner.com
At the conclusion of April, the Mariner rotation had tallied 21 runs above average according to tRA, a figure that ranked second in baseball. Since there's just five members, I am going to break it down individually. Please note that grades expressed both herein and in the prior report express absolute grades. They are not curved based on expectations. Curved grades will be presented in the final installment.
ERIK BEDARD: He's healthy and he's back to looking like a pitcher worthy of the acclaim he got after 2007. He's missing fewer bats and getting less ground balls, but he is also making up for that with fewer walks as well. Bedard posted a 142 tRA+ in 2007. He's at 143 so far this year. I've been in love with Bedard's personality since we traded for him and now I get to be in love with his pitching too. I dearly hope he stays around because this is a lot of fun. GRADE: A
FELIX HERNANDEZ: He's been Felix, but a good version of Felix. Namely, the version that hasn't corrected anything we asked for him to correct, but instead has flashed command of his fastball. Which I am fine with. Our whole pleadings with Felix have been based under the premise that it was going to take a long time for him to gain the command of his fastball that he thought he had. Felix has never thrown more strikes and never missed more bats than he has so far this year. If/when he pulls the ground balls back up, it's the trifecta. GRADE: A
CHRIS JAKUBAUSKAS: Filling in for the injured Aussie southpaw, it's hard to have asked more from Jakubauskas. A converted outfielder, Jakubauskas seems to come with the self-awareness that he does not possess the best stuff in the world and so he compensates by throwing strikes and not centering them. Among starting pitchers with at least 50 expected outs, Jakubauskas ranks 15th in percentage of pitches thrown for a strike. He's got control and his fairly neutral, trending toward ground ball profile helps him stay away from home runs as well. It's not great, and it may prove to be short-lived, but this is where you love to find back end starters. GRADE: B
RYAN ROWLAND-SMITH: We only got to see one start out of Rowland-Smith before he hit the DL with some minor arm issues. It wasn't the most fantastic start ever, fraught with pitches out of the zone and some lucky pop ups. That said, he did get a good number of ground balls and avoided yielding a home run. He looks close to returning and hopefully he can get back on the road to being a useful member of the back of the rotation. GRADE: Incomplete
JARROD WASHBURN: Washburn rattled off three consecutive solid starts to open the season before getting lit up in his final April start. 18 strikeouts to seven walks is good to see though and three home runs allowed over 26.1 innings is good for a fly ball pitcher. Washburn stands to gain the most from our outfield defense this season and so far he has both done that and improved himself a little as well, which is a huge relief after three consecutive season in which he has gotten steadily worse. With his tRA+ going from 97 to 91 to 83 as a Mariner, it seemed like a low to mid-6 tRA was coming. So far though, he's holding on. GRADE: C+
A C+ being our worst grade? That's pretty good.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2009 Mariners RP tRA for April 2009. Source StatCorner.com
Coming into the start of May, the bullpen ranked 11th in baseball, at 1.6 runs above average. Many thought the pen was going to be as big of a liability as our offense. Suffice to say that they have managed to survive and even excel at times despite their tendency to raise our collective blood pressure.
Despite facing just under half as many hitters as the starters in April, the bullpen walked just one fewer batter. That's not terribly surprising and the reason they've garnered the nickname The Ministry. They rank 25th in free passes allowed per batter faced.
However, they also have had a slightly lower strikeout rate than the group of starters, which is both surprising and disappointing. In fact, they rank 25th in the league in strikeout rate. We knew to expect lots of walks from this collection of power ground ball arms with spotty control, but we hoped they would make up some of that with high strikeout totals.
Other totals include ranking 24th in line drive rate, 21st in ground ball rate and 3rd in home run rate. Big time uh ohs. That home run rate is the least stable of all of these indicators and coupled with the poor showings in the most pertinent categories makes me want to bury my head in the sand and pretend that I never earned a minor degree in Statistics or did all that baseball analytical research. I fear for our bullpen.
Still, it's not all bad news. Shawn Kelley has been solid coming up straight from Double-A. Mark Lowe looks the best he has since 2006. Even Miguel Batista has managed to be useful, soaking up innings and not being bad. There's going to continue being a lot of fluidity at the back of the pen as this is not a group of consistent and known products, but that weakness is mitigated by the tremendous, almost Egyptian-pyramid-building-slave-level amount of depth we have in relievers. As long as Wakamatsu and Zduriencik are proactive about shuffling guys in and out of roles as they thrive and struggle, we should be able to avoid the bullpen being a drain on our team's bottom line.
0 recs | 53 comments
I enjoy your grading system and suggest that you try it over at Fangraphs.
Teej - May 5, 2009
Jakubausk - A - s
Jeff Sullivan - May 5, 2009
buh?
Matthew - May 6, 2009
You've been spelling it Jakubausk - U - s
Jeff Sullivan - May 6, 2009
Oh.
Matthew - May 6, 2009
I think I can reasonably guess what Silva's grade would have been.
However a review of starting pitchers feels a little empty without summarizing just how much fun his pitching has provided.
oreotree - May 6, 2009
Why not put Silva on the list?
I mean if we’re truly evaluating things, RRS shouldn’t be on here and he should. It clearly skews the point you’re trying to make. If you’re going to do analysis you can’t omit what you’d rather not have in the data pool.
SethGrandpa - May 6, 2009
Might have something to do
With this.
ThundaPC - May 6, 2009
Well I don't even watch him pitch...
But I’m not doing player analysis.
SethGrandpa - May 6, 2009
It's amazing how we have managed to succeed with just a four pitcher rotation.
It has been slightly upsetting to experience one less game of baseball every 5 days compared to all other teams in the major leagues, but with all 4 pitchers scoring higher than a C+, that helps make up for it. Good pitching is always fun to watch.
CapSea - May 6, 2009
Wait, isn't Carlos Silva in the rotation?
How did he not make the grade card?
Scott McKinney - May 6, 2009
Who?
ignacio - May 6, 2009
I do not know of that player.
Woodinville_12thMan - May 6, 2009
Carlos Silva...
is a 21-year-old outfielder in the Pirates’ organization. I have no idea why you thought he was in the Mariners’ starting rotation.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
This reeks of regression going foward.
octoberty - May 6, 2009
This is why when people told us having the blogs talk to one another more was a good thing I started laughing
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
This reeks of someone using a buzzword to try and sound like he knows what he's talking about
Jeff Sullivan - May 6, 2009
Don't empower the trolls
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
Little does he know, our bullpen has been synergizing backward overflow at an unheralded rate.
abender20 - May 6, 2009
That somehow sounds suggestive.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
eh, the bullpen should be fine once Morrow returns
But Washburn, Jakub, and Bedard will each be on a downward slope from here on out. Some steeper than the other.
It’s gonna be tough getting swept by the Royals having not faced Greinke or Meche.
octoberty - May 6, 2009
A guy with a 50% LOB will be on a downward slope?
Do tell
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
I'll grant him Washburn and Jakubauskas
Bedard could easily stay ~this good as long as he’s healthy, though.
Jeff Sullivan - May 6, 2009
In terms of Jakubauskas talent, yes
In terms of Jakubauskas results, no.
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
It's all regression!
Jeff Sullivan - May 6, 2009
Regression will hit us especially hard
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
That's the recession
JI - May 6, 2009
Yeah, but will he stay healthy?
When did he have sugery? It’s pretty amazing that he looks this good this early.
Is Branyan for real?
octoberty - May 6, 2009
What the hell does Bedard staying healthy have to do with regression?
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
Nothing, I'm agreeing with him.
octoberty - May 6, 2009
If you mean .446-wOBA for real, then no
if you mean legitimate abuser and nightmare for righties, then yes.
Jeff Sullivan - May 6, 2009
Bedard? Really?
He only has a history of being a top flight pitcher when healthy. I’ll tell you who will be on a downward slope. This guy.
Sec 108 - May 6, 2009
I'm sick of this guy.
He’s not putting any effort or creativity into his trolling, and any interesting digs at him go *whoosh * over his head.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
He's not a troll in the sense that I honestly don't think he's trying to be one.
Aaron Campeau - May 6, 2009
Maybe you've seen him around before,
but from where I see it, stuff like
is textbook trolling. He’s not giving analysis, he’s not talking about probabilities or projections, he’s not even really arguing – he’s just nakedly declaring “we will lose” and that this will somehow redeem him and serve as an accomplishment of his. It’s one thing to pick an analytical fight, and you have something to brag about if you win that, but not if your opponant’s team loses. That’s bush league.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
And plus losing to Meche is way worse than losing to Brian Bannister
God dammit Gil
Graham MacAree - May 6, 2009
Considering the source it's not really unexpected.
You can be a jerk without being a troll.
Aaron Campeau - May 6, 2009
He's a Rangers fan.
waldo rojas - May 6, 2009
I take it back, it was bait
But I do think these next 11 games will be a good test for the Mariners. Because looking at your schedule, I see all of your series wins have come against teams that have struggled a bit to this point.
octoberty - May 6, 2009
Yes, but nearly every team's true talent level around .500, often better.
As Matthew linked to here and here.
And hot and cold streaks have no predictive value and don’t affect a team’s true talent level (although the Angels were probably knocked from an 85 win TT to an 80 win TT by injuries, which do).
We played:
Minnesota: mid-to-high 70s wins
Oakland: high-70s to low 80s
LAA: mid 80s minus injuries
Detroit: mid 80s wins
Tampa Bay: high 80s wins TT
LAA angels again
White Sox (ok, they suck)
Texas: mid 70s
so at worst, we’ve had an average difficulty schedule, at beast an above average difficulty schedule. So we’re a legit .500 team, which is more than either LL’s authors or USSM’s authors projected at the beginning of the year.
But yes, the next 11 games will be a good test. It’s 1/15th of the season, so how could it not be?
I appreciate that you took the Royals comment back, but dread more softly when your visiting rivals’ blogs.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
*tread more softly, not dread more softly.
You should always be filled with dread of the wrath of the Sexy People.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
If you could link me to this post.. It seems a lot more interesting to me.
octoberty - May 6, 2009
I'm not sure where it is. If you do some keyword searches he might find it, but your guess is as good as mine until I can look into it further.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
*keyword searches on USSM, YOU might find it.
Yeesh. Bad typing day.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
Could you tell me, or guess, what the Angels projected wins would be if...
……Santana or Lackey didn’t pitch an inning this year??
octoberty - May 6, 2009
Mid- to high-70s
Jeff Sullivan - May 6, 2009
Going off of devil_fingers' work
I’d say about 6 or 7 wins, since they were each projected to be about a 4 WAR pitcher. That’s just a guess, though.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
*their projected would get docked six or seven games, so year, mid to high 70s, as Jeff said.
Decatur - May 6, 2009
I think you forgot Silva.
JI - May 6, 2009
I think you mean Thompson
.Taylor - May 6, 2009
that meme's so dead it's been fertilizing plants for years now
pdb - May 6, 2009
Why was Washburn given a C+
He’s pitching at 2002 season level – he’s been a legitimately excellent #3 so far, and his tRA is 3.91. Are you basing the C+ off his *tRA and expecting him to suck going forward?
Decatur - May 6, 2009
Hernandez has established himself as a great pitcher
He’s rising to All-Star starter level status.
Colts Homer - May 6, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.