From Wikipedia:
15 and 16 form a Ruth-Aaron pair under the second definition in which repeated prime factors are counted as often as they occur.
Since it is possible to find sequences of 16 consecutive integers such that each inner member member shares a factor with either the first or the last member, 16 is an Erdős–Woods number. The smallest such range of 16 consecutive integers is from 2184 to 2200.
Which I suppose is all well and good, but why is 16 such a crazy number in our case? As it turns out, that's the number of swinging strikes Brandon Morrow generated in his start last night against the Padres. In 4 innings and less than 80 pitches (and walking the pitcher). For those of you keeping track at home, that means he'd have equaled Carlos Silva's season total sometime in the fifth had he continued. I know he was getting hit pretty hard, but today was Morrow's equivalent of Felix's start against Texas. To get that many swinging strikes you need to have something special going. So what was he throwing?
Mostly fastballs, to be honest. This is my first attempt at a pitch fx analysis, so hopefully I haven't bollocksed anything up here...

You can see two clear groups here. The one hanging around up top and a little left of centre is his fastball, and the other is the slider. Note that Morrow wasn't really very good at controlling the vertical break on his slider today - sometimes it was a Sean Green frisbee special and other times it went all slurvey on him (Jeff says that the 'slider' with a tonne of drop is actually Morrow's curve, and I'd be inclined to trust him). There's also a little 'grouping' of three pitches down and to the left of the fastballs, which gameday has classified as changeups, a definition which I have no dispute with. So we have a handful of changeups and a decent amount of sliders against a very fastbally backdrop. And where was he throwing these pitches?


Fastballs tend towards the catcher's left and are generally high in the zone or up. From this graph we can both see the run on Morrow's heat (the break is towards the right-handed batter's box, and is pretty pronounced even at higher velocities) and the reason he's a flyballer. It also looks like he loses fastball command in the natural direction of its movement, which... I dunno, it tells you something, I suppose. Were there any noticeable differences between Morrow's approach to left-handers vs. right-handers?
| vs. LHB | vs. RHB |
![]() |
![]() |
Morrow threw no changeups to righties and only a few to lefthanders, which makes sense because it's not a great pitch as it is and changeups are generally more effective to opposite handed batters. He also seemed to have some issues with commanding the slider against lefties, throwing the ball at their feet a few times - although that's likely attributable to small sample size. We also see Morrow trying to work outside when he's around the zone, but his command wasn't great (it's Morrow, after all) and he left a fair share of pitches straight down the middle. Let's take a look at the actual results now, breaking each pitch into one of four outcomes: Balls, contact strikes (fouls, balls in play), called strikes, and swinging strikes.

Umpire wasn't calling balls and strikes very well on the vertical edges of the zone: Morrow got a few extremely generous strike calls over Burke's left shoulder, which were probably made up for by numerous strikes on the black called balls over Burke's right. There are an absolute tonne of swinging strikes showing up in this graph. It's worth pointing out that Morrow was facing an extremely poor lineup here. The Padres have a couple of guys who can't make contact to save their lives (Kouzmanoff and Headley) to go along with a pitcher, and there's where most of the swinging strikes are derived - 4 for Kouzmanoff, 3 for Headley, and 4 for Geer. Still, you can only beat what's put in front of you, and Felix Hernandez got 5 less swinging strike in 5 more innings against the very same team two days prior. Let's see if there's a pattern in terms of batter-handedness with the swinging strike data.
| vs. LHB | vs. RHB |
![]() |
![]() |
Again, compare these charts to the pitch types shown above. You'll probably see that against righthanders, Morrow got 9(!) swinging strikes on his fastball compared to one from his slider, and against lefties he recorded four swinging strikes on offspeed pitches (mostly sliders) against one with his fastball. So, without wanting to draw conclusions from such a small sample, it appears that righthanders really have trouble making decent contact against Morrow's fastball while lefthanders hit it fine but have major problems with the slider. This is somewhat counter-intuitive to me, as I had suspected the opposite when I first saw the relative movements of those pitches. Sliders move towards the left-handed batter's box, fastballs to the right, and I assumed that pitches moving towards the hands makes it a little easier to make contact, which is without doubt a completely false assumption in Morrow's case (for this game, at least). You'll also probably notice that for whatever reason right-handed batters were swinging at absolutely everything in the zone. It's really unusual to only see three called strikes when hitters are swinging and missing so often.
Of course, any time you get 16 swinging strikes in 4 innings of work is going to produce some unusual results. I'm still on the 'send Morrow to Tacoma' bandwagon - mostly so he generates some semblence of command, but this was about as good as we could have hoped for from him today, despite the two runs allowed in the first and walking the pitcher again. Of course, Tacoma's opposition probably have better hitters than the Padres...
3 recs | 67 comments
So if he had faced Ruth and Aaron, he'd have generated fewer than 15-16 swinging strikes?
Nice writeup. I’ll be curious to see if the somewhat backwards results continue with respect to who missed what pitches. Perhaps it has something to do with just how dreadful most of the Padres right-handed hitters are? Where is swinging strike data located? If it’s Blanco and Rodriguez missing most of those fastballs, I wouldn’t think quite as much of the totals.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
I mean Kouzmanoff, not Rodriguez. It's Kouzmanoff who's also running a sub-75% contact rate.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
Swinging strikes
vs. RHB
4 to Kouzmanoff, 4 to Geer, 2 to Blanco
vs. LHB
3 to Headley, 1 to Gwynn, 1 to Giles, 1 to Rodriguez
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
Headley is also a sub-75% contact rate hitter. That's a pretty sad list of hitters.
Just another friendly reminder how atrocious the Padre offense is.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
Yeah, they're awful
I’ll take a look at his Colorado start this weekend and see what happens when he actually has to deal with real hitters. But at the same time, you can only beat what’s in front of you.
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
Ain't that the truth.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
To put things in perspective Felix Hernandez had 11 swinging strikes in 9 innings on Tuesday
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
He apparently didn't figure out that he could have just thrown as hard as possible high in the zone.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
Oh goodness.
Wilder. - June 19, 2009
Those four against Geer give me pause and make me think that Morrow was a little worse than the numbers show
but then take away Geer’s PAs and Morrow still missed 12 bats on 61 pitches. So, yeah. It’s a shame about that whole annoying-ass first inning, because Morrow wasn’t terrible.
Jeff Sullivan - June 19, 2009
The fact that he managed to walk Geer and nobody else just confuses me
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
He did fall behind nine of the first 12 batters he faced
I’m pretty sure that’s why his start looked so much less impressive from the stands than it does in the numbers.
Jeff Sullivan - June 19, 2009
Yeah, I wasn't very impressed at all even following on gameday
I wanted to play around with pitch fx yesterday and then noticed the obscene amount of swinging strikes (that’s something like 0.89 swinging strikes per batters faced)
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
That, and he was getting a lot of help from some of the Padres "hitters".
JLProck - June 19, 2009
You know what might help him avoid annoying-ass first innings?
Going to Tacoma and learning how to pitch as a starter.
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
Having a left fielder also would have helped.
Rollo Tomasi - June 19, 2009
But... but...
There’s such a compelling argument as to why he should stay!
JLProck - June 19, 2009
WHEN WILL YOU PEOPLE LEARN IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CATCHER?
pdb - June 19, 2009
I totally missed this, and now understand I picked the absolute worst time to post MY fanpost.
Shit.
marc w - June 19, 2009
But see, your fanpost was cogent, coherent, and contained facts
pdb - June 19, 2009
Yahoo!'s recap of yesterday's game has a picture of Alfonso Soriano in it
Jeff Sullivan - June 19, 2009
Was it accompanied by the caption "Here's a hitter whose contact ability and wOBA would fit right in on the Padres."?
abender20 - June 19, 2009
Yahoo! comments are adorable.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
We're not even .500 against the NL West this year
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
Jewed!
I haven’t heard that term used non-ironically since middle school.
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
A few of my friends use it because they know I find a little anti-semitism hilarious, but other than that...
abender20 - June 19, 2009
The only people I know that say it at all are Jewish
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
That's OUR word
abender20 - June 19, 2009
Jewed=family feud=The Mariners got familied today.
I’m going with it.
Kirsten Schlewitz - June 19, 2009
Well now you're just off your John.
I like the thought process, but it doesn’t quite have that catchy ring to it. Also, it needs some LL relation. Jewed → Craft brewed → The Mariners got crafted today.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
I'm going with screwed
but then I’m a traditionalist.
pdb - June 19, 2009
And yet you're obsessed with London.
I think ‘crafted’ isn’t half bad, especially considering it still leads back to ‘jewed,’ which, as abender pointed out, is one of his team’s words, not one of my team’s.
marc w - June 19, 2009
By all means, use it. Just use it ironically in the right company.
You wouldn’t shout the N word while walking through Inglewood, and you shouldn’t drop any hard Js while rolling through Mercer Island.
abender20 - June 19, 2009
obsessed is a strong word, but I do love London
but talking like a Cockney when I’ve spent approximately 1/40th of my life in London is pretty silly.
pdb - June 19, 2009
Not cockney, Jockney
Kirsten Schlewitz - June 19, 2009
I don't want to rain on anyone's parade (and from what I understand, this is fantastic analysis)
But aren’t there 17 integers between 2,184 and 2,200?
calim - June 19, 2009
The explanation he quoted was substandard
From the Erdős–Woods number link:
Jeff Sullivan - June 19, 2009
I like that SBN turned the umlaut into a tilde. How do you pronounce a tilde'd O?
Ohhhhoohhh
abender20 - June 19, 2009
I believe the tilde is actually correct.
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
Everyone else seems to think it's an umlaut.
How would you pronounced an o con tilde?
abender20 - June 19, 2009
If you look at it closer I think it's an umlaut on SBN
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
Yes, but it's a tilde in Hungarian.
It’s apparently called a Hungarumlaut, which is just a fucking awesome word. It’s a double acute accent.
Seems like both umlaut and tilde can be used, but I don’t know.
Fascinating.
marc w - June 19, 2009
It's for making the o con umlaut longer. So it's actually a distinct sound from the umlauted O.
marc w - June 19, 2009
Holy shit I can finally start a power metal band
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
It had better involved synchronized windmilling a la Amon Amarth
tootthekazoo - June 20, 2009
This is one of the best words I've ever heard in my life.
Kirsten Schlewitz - June 19, 2009
I see
Guess I should have clicked the link.
calim - June 19, 2009
Math is hard.
JLProck - June 19, 2009
2+2 = sweater
pdb - June 19, 2009
That's unpossible
serotonein - June 19, 2009
Yeah, I checked my work
it turns out that 2+2 = spork. I feel foolish.
pdb - June 19, 2009
I don't think so
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
well played (or danced, whatever)
pdb - June 19, 2009
Also:
Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president. Brandon Morrow was born in Santa Rosa, which was incorporated two years AFTER Lincoln was allegedly assassinated.
WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
waldo rojas - June 19, 2009
Don't you mean
Sleeple
Graham MacAree - June 19, 2009
I like this comment way more than I should.
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
16 gets even crazier
Sixteen is four squared.
I played four square until I was sixteen.
CBF - June 19, 2009
Did you seriously create this account to tell everyone you played 4 square til you were 16?
I mean, I loved 4 square and all.. but that shit’s gotta stop at grade school.
d0nkey - June 19, 2009
Four-square was where all the shitty wall-ball players went to play during recess.
kentroyals5 - June 19, 2009
Four square is so much fucking cooler than wall ball it's not even funny.
Aaron Campeau - June 19, 2009
And all the shitty 4square players went and played 6circle.
Goose - June 19, 2009
6circle? At my school it was 6-square, which was a big improvement on 4-square.
Lanky - June 19, 2009
Or three flies up
Jeff Sullivan - June 19, 2009
No typewriters, no cherry bombs.
waldo rojas - June 19, 2009
Ha, and I really wondered about this today
Schuxu - June 19, 2009
Stupid links
http://xkcd.com/599/
Schuxu - June 19, 2009
Speaking of Carlos Silva
I’m going to see him play tonight.
speedomike - June 19, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.