SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

51-44, Chart

7_23_09_medium

Biggest Contribution: Jarrod Washburn, +46.2%
Biggest Suckfest: Russell Branyan, -11.8%
Most Important AB: Sweeney double, +10.0%
Most Important Pitch: Granderson triple, -16.2%
Total Contribution by Pitcher(s): +66.0%
Total Contribution by Lineup: -19.8%
Total Contribution by Opposition: +3.8%
(What is this chart?)

0 recs  |  325 comments

Comments

Please note that this is not a thread in which to discuss Mark Buehrle
HALMAN AND WASHBURN FOR BUEHRLE
DID YOU SEE THAT
Yes. This thread is strictly for out-by-out updates on the Angels game.
Sorry I missed that

Below.

That's odd. I didn't know Branyan knew how to suck.
We're the ones that usually do the sucking.
Lower than Halladay! YES!
Looks like I missed a good game. I'm on the Wash train!
23-13 in 1 run games now
Also, 21 outs, only 3 Ks for Washburn.

So he had 18 outs in the field against only 2 hits? Is that correct?

Sounds sustainable to me.

GB/FB/LD of 4-11-4 on the day

Wonderful!

In the new Yankee Stadium

That would be a 3 HR day…

Sell now!
This is not the first time.

Washburn doesn’t get run support, doesn’t strike out any batters, and still shows all the shiny stats that get him noticed.
What is the statistical probability that somebody with a 4.5ish tRA who gets one of the lowest run support figures in the league not only finishes with a winning record, but does so with a top-15 ERA?

Strange things can happen over just 30 starts.

I couldn't believe it when it flashed up that the DA has only conceded one HR all year.

It seems that every ball in play is a fly ball or pop out. Long may this continue, and then come the off-season, get him traded to a dumb organisation for some prospects.

Nope

Let’s not let him go like Putz.

Uhhhhhh
Yes I know that he sucks now

But the talent is still there.

Have you noticed that we actually traded him for other players?

Lots of them? Several of them very useful? One of them is the second most valuable CF in the AL?

Yes

It was a good deal, I’m just saying I don’t want to let DA go.

Even if he were to be traded for someone better?
Like whom?

Of course in that case. Find a stupid team and trade him if they give us value.

Which is what I was saying 10 comments ago!
Clearly, but I was just walking us back to that point.
Looping threads is only funny when it's ironic and intentional
It was intentional on one end.
July 14th is Bastille Day.
June 14 is Flag Day
More like Fag Day amirite
Hey it's almost like EM had this exact idea already!
get him traded to a dumb organisation for some prospects.
This is a joke right?

Thank God for that.

Right...

Although Putz sucking might have more to do with every single Met under-performing this year basically.

Or the fact that he has been bad for almost two years
I was about to say this

2007 tRA – 2.91 SwS% – 12.6
2008 tRA – 4.61 SwS% – 11.0
2009 tRA – 5.11 SwS% – 8.2

I’m still new to this but those numbers don’t look good to me.

It's almost like there's a downward trend there!
Also there's supposed to be a link to J.J.'s

Statcorner page in that post somewhere.

Can you guys imagine how amazing Wash would be pitching in the NL?

If he can do this in the AL, he has to be up there with Dan Haren for best pitcher in the league.

Jerk
His WHIP is just that good.
Or if I were feeling more like sb, "is the derivative of acceleration, yes."
It's the integral, not the derivative.
Wait I'm completely wrong.

I’m fired.

Fire yourself at a rapid velocity.
Hey if it was rapid enough he could theoretically see his mistake in time to not make it

Einstein for Dummies is a helluva book

That's a good point. Good luck finding a functional DeLorean, though.
Out of a cannon

into the sun.

11.9 km/s is going to hurt
It's the sudden acceleration, not the velocity, that will hurt.
That's the best part about escape velocity from a cannon.
I always thought it was the deceleration on impact that would hurt.
I think he would need a good outfield behind him, regardless of what league he is in.

For example, Raul might screw him over in Philly.

But, he's the third best in fielding!

For Left Fielders…

In the national league.

He's actually still got a positive UZR this season somehow

he’s going earn all $33M of that contract in one fell swoop

His UZR/150 though is -0.4 though according to Fangraphs

But yeah, you’re definitely right.

Though he is 37th in MLB in UZR/150, 31 in UZR, and 39 in RngR. So by a very basic, non-position adjusted measure, he should not be a starting OF in the majors (assuming 30 teams and 3 starting OF/team).

I hope the Phillies scout at the game was suitably impressed.
The Phillies OF defense is really good

it will help Washburn look a lot better

We make too many errors to really help Wash out.
As long as no one ever pulls the ball
Even with IbaƱez?
ESPECIALLY with Ibanez
I didn't realize that seattlebruin's comment was sarcasm.
(sarcasm)
Though with Werth and Victorino, they're actually not awful outside of Raul
I wonder if the Philly SBNation blog has caught on to his crappy defense yet.
I made a comment about once over there.

They called me a “bitter” M’s fan.

All two of the posters there?
Well that's redundant.
Like irritating Angels fan?
that was redundant.
So, how much of this improvement is defense

and how much of this is Washburn pitching better?

Probably like 80-20
Crap

Can’t wait until the Cardinals sell the farm for him.

Well this seems like the right person to make this comment to
Hey, I'm a cards fan too

Oh well, better than the rumored Wallace-for-Holliday deal; at least I’ll still get to root for them

*if they go to the Mariners
I would prefer Wallace + somethings good for Halladay

but Wallace for Holliday looks ok to because he has no position and you get draft picks.

How would that work if the A’s finish in the bottom half?

Supplemental and second rounder, right?
Sounds correctish
Plus I'm pretty sure the Cardinals are getting a sub .300 wOBA from LF
Yeah, at second base.
You have it backwards
The Skipster is better offensively than I thought he was. .338!
With slightly above average defense in left he'd be OK!
Let's see how he performs as a ROOGY!
He is a great hitter for a pitcher!
So would our current leftfielder
Washburn for a sexy shortstop, please.
Does Guti have a brother?
Booti
Fruti
No, that makes too much sense.
As I often never do.
Wash's OBA is down .70

To .275 from .345, that’s your difference right there.

It's luck!

and defense!

A lot of luck

The knack our pitchers have for getting out of jams this season is amazing.

Actually I don't find Ryan Langerhans that attractive
That sounds like it's your problem
He looks to me like he wears a black t-shirt of his favourite thrash metal band under his uniform
Maybe it's the cowboy hats in that wedding photo somebody posted

but I doubt it. I think he’s wearing a pop country t-shirt under the uniform.

He's got that too-tight facelift perpetual look of surprise thing going.
Wow you are picky.
Doesn't mean I think he's ugly!

Beauty is directly proportional to fielding, pitching, and batting skills far as I’m concerned.

You forgot throwing arm and baserunning.
Only 5 out in the AL West

And 4.5 in the Wild Card, yay!

Unbelievable
Losing the West but winning the WC would be something else.
Something else that isn't very bloody likely to happen.
Serious question

How do you think the media would react if Washburn were traded for something that helps us right now, and would that reaction change Zdurencik’s standing with the FO? I’m thinking that trading Washburn wouldn’t be worth it if it creates a shitstorm that could get Z fired if the team stumbles on field in the next year and a half.

I think the ownership is going to give Z more rope than that

The media would hate it, but I think Howard/Lincoln have realized they’re not that smart when it comes to baseball decisions.

One would pray that Howard/Lincoln and Chuck/Armstrong knew better, but it's hard to know.
I trust Jack/Zdurencik.
He hired Don/Wakamatsu, that makes him golden in my book
Whoops a doodle
I don't think trading one starter headed to free agency could possibly result in a shitstorm warranting Z's termination
I don't think there would be a problem apart from dumb fans.

The media are bitches and Z has tremendous good will right now.

I have no idea his standing because I don't work the FO

I’m legitimately curious, and it should be considered

Did you see what they did to DePodesta in LA?

I think it’s definitely a concern. If the right deal comes up, you take it of course, but this has to be in Z’s mind.

I just wish we knew how much rope Armstrong/Lincoln are willing to give him. Probably plenty, but the trade-Washburn-then-suck scenario would use up quite a bit.

Which is why I hypothesize it would not be worth while
Yes, I read your comment up there!

It is thought provoking.

I think it depends on what you get. At this point, trading him to cut salary and/or get a B- prospect may not be worth it. More than that and I think he’d have enough cover even if everything blew up.

A lot of that had to do with the media in LA hating him.

The media in Seattle seems to like Zduriencik a lot.

Yeah but if he does something to royally piss them off they might hate him too
I don't disagree, but Baker and Stone are probably the most visible M's writers

and both of them seem to acknowledge that he knows what he is doing and have said that they are okay with moving Washburn/Bedard even if they aren’t exactly in favor of it.

The media in Seattle LOVES Jarrod Washburn.
To expand on that

Yes, it would take a confluence of several bad things for the media to just jump on GMZ – the move would have to backfire and the M’s would have to fall out of the race quickly, and probably some players would have to grumble about what the move did to morale. But all of that is possible…

At this point, you're almost better off holding on to him just because of this

unless someone really stupidly just blows you away with an offer

I think it is likely that someone will make such an offer.
Jimmy Rollins!
Well that'd be cool.
I think you'd need a name brand player in return, assuming this is the case
Maybe in order to not piss off the idiots, but that shouldn't be a concern.
I'm saying to escape overly harsh criticism
I understand what you mean but I have faith in Zduriencik to manage risk and make informed decisions.
I still would rather trade Bedard before he blows up
Bedard may have value beyond this season.

Washburn does not.

And Bedard's value is not even near it's peak

while Washburn’s is higher than any peak we could have ever imagined.

It's irrelevant if it's at his peak

His peak has likely passed

He has been healthy before.

It’s not out of the question he could put up another 2007 if we sign him to a one year deal.

You can always resign him(?)
The odds of that happening seem exceptionally low if he is moved.
Hopefully they get over it

If the player is good (which he should be, if we’re trading Wash away), then they’ll soon forget. Kind of like with Putz.

This is what it would take to trade Washburn

there is no reason to unless we’re getting an awesome return.

It is possible, but I don't think it is likely and it shouldn't prevent the team from making a move.
I don't blame them

he’s very candid and honest with them and seems to make their jobs a lot easier. It helps that he’s gotten good results all season, too

Exactly. I actually love his interviews these days.

He’s refreshingly candid and aware of his own shortcomings (more so than many sportswriters/fans).

More like Plaschke hating him
Wasn't some of the storm over DePo caused by his poor relationship with the media?
I would just look to 2006-2008 to prove that his success isn't sustainable.
All depends on the return

I think even the FO was planning a rebuilding year under Z. And I think they’re still committed to letting him see how he could rebuild the team given free reign. If he nets something of value going forward, I don’t think they’ll be upset, especially after things like the Putz deal.

Second Serious Question

Which helps more

 Bedard regularly giving us 4+ inning starts?

or bedard working out of the bullpen?

I have to assume A
I would lean that way too, but I am unsure
As am I, I'm simply assuming that more innings of a good pitcher is better than fewer, higher leverage innings
JJ was pretty popular right?
Yup, and plenty of people hated the trade.
I didn't really like the trade either

then I saw Franklin Gutierrez play center field and all was instantly forgiven

I think the (major) media would handle it fine

However, it is very obviously not a move that Z could afford to make if he weren’t getting much in return. Unless the M’s drop out of this, selling Washburn would almost certainly have to be accompanied by another move that adds to the roster.

Thank you.

You’re a super gal.

I can't believe they'd fire him after one 'mistake' (their invevitable words, not mine)

While letting Bavasi go on and on like he did.

Besides, if the return for Wash works out well then they’ll forget about him soon enough and maybe realise that RRS is doing pretty the same thing.

The problem may be that Armstrong/Lincoln

took no end of shit for giving Bavasi as long as they gave him. They may not be willing to do that again.

But Z has already made many more good moves

and has turned the team around in less than a year. They’re not going to ignore that because of Bavasi’s failures.

The problem is that we don't know that.
They ignored it in LA

But DePo was hated to begin with

Have you ever heard sports talk radio?

He got the team into contention and then he pulled the plug because he doesn’t care about winning. He thinks this is all about looking smart and not about winning championships! He just wants HIS guys out there, and doesn’t care about chemistry or what’s good for the organization!

Some people are going to think that, sure.

The only sports talk radio I listen to is Brock and Salk, but I’d say an equal number of their callers on the issue have said they would be okay with moving Washburn or Bedard because they feel like Zduriencik knows what he is doing.

People are fickle!

I think the odds of a trade like this really hurting his standing are like 1/10 or 1/20, but, y’know, they’re not 1/1000000.

If you can make the team better you have to take those odds.

And I should point out that I am not in favor of moving Washburn because you can.

Here, here!

If nothing else he gives us depth a (gasp) morale

And to bring up another point

let’s say Zduriencik decides not to move Wasburn, he regresses and the M’s fall out of it. The biggest gripe you hear from casual fans is that the Mariners have a history of being indecisive at the trade deadline. If they are close to where they are in the race a week from now and the above scenario occurs, those same revisionist morons are likely to pile on him for continuing what they see as a trend of fence-sitting.

When things don’t work out as well as they think they should, uninformed fans bitch and they usually blame the people at the top. I’d say the odds are just as good that keeping Washburn backfires as trading him, so the best thing to do is weigh the risks and proceed as though what the fan base thinks is irrelevant in this particular situation.

A great point, ac

I just think casual fans believe in Washburn and would deflect blame for the collapse away from him. Whereas if they collapsed just after a trade, people would point to the trade as the causal factor. That’s crap, of course, but I think we underestimate how popular Washburn’s become.

I know he is popular, but like I said, you've got to take risk into account and roll the dice sometimes.

I’m not saying that I will be disappointed if he isn’t moved, I just trust Zduriencik to make the correct decision re: public perception.

Salk just asked how do you go into the clubhouse and say "we're selling"?
Sports talk radio is the lowest form of fandom

Regardless of how little the FO knows, I think they’ll take their cue from the media and the fans. And most of them have faith in Z at the point. It could evaporate a bit if Wash is traded and we tank, but it’s not going to be the tipping point or anything. And I have faith that if he’s trading Wash, he’s at least trying to make us better in the future.

There is a touching belief in all the callers today that the M's are destined for post-season play this year.
You don't trade pitching in the middle of a pennet race, you need a big bat , and to send a message to the rest of the division, you need Matt Holliday"
Roy would be a much bigger get
Oh, a caller already proposed that.

it was later referenced by a caller who thought while it would be good to have three Cy Young candidates in the rotation ….

We tried that...
The Mariners don't have the players necessary to get Roy Halladay.

And even if he is the best pitcher on the planet, I’m grateful for it. We can’t mortgage the farm on another “ace” for a year and a half before he signs a $150 million dollar contract with the Red Sox.

They actually might have the players

but I don’t think we’d enjoy the cost

They could probably get him for Aumont, Morrow, Clement, Halman, and Saunders.

Of course if that happened, I would probably fly into a violent rage and burn down Safeco.

They could probably get him straight up for one player on the ML team
I would imagine so, yes.
You forgot Triunfel.
If your message is "we're retards" then sure
From Rany on the Royals
The highlight of my weekend – hell, it might be the highlight of my career – came on Friday night, when unbeknownst to the Royals (or me), the participant in the between-innings "Match Game" promotion was a devoted reader of this blog. After winning the promotion, our good reader was given the microphone and asked to say a few words. He said only two: "Rany Rules!" The microphone was snatched away by the announcer at that point, but judging from the audience’s reaction, the damage was already done.
Jesus, I feel so sorry for Royals fans.
Goddammit

keep front page posts on topic or you will be castrated

Trade trade trade.
Is this 710 caller on speed or something?
Because we were all listening to 710 at that exact moment and therefore know exactly what you are talking about.
Anyone who heard it will know what I'm talking about, I would think

He was on for a good 5 minutes

Really wow I shall go back in time in order to try and figure out who you mean
I highly doubt you have the ability to travel through time
Everyone has the ability to travel through time
And here I've been moving forward through time like a lazy bastard all these years
I clearly meant backwards
And I clearly meant that I do indeed possess astonishing superpowers
I thought you were just being sarcastic
And here I was thinking you were too dense to understand me rather than being too juvenile to figure out why you got this response
Neither

I understand why I got the response, but was it that ridiculous to think that there would be other people listening to 710 at the time I posted it? I didn’t know any better ways to describe the guy, so I was just make an observation.

Making*
Continuing this exchange enriches the site

and is highly likely to end well for you

Am I just supposed to not respond? If so just tell me and I'll note it, but that seemed like something I needed to at least respond to
Yes, it would be best to let it go.
In the future, if something happens on the radio that relates to the topic at hand, recount the story.

Otherwise, it’s akin to walking into a meeting at work and saying “I just saw a person in the elevator.” then walking out.

Try the offtopic next time.

Also try to tell us what the meth head said that might have been strange.

He was stuttering a lot, and talking extremely fast
So he sounded like Dave Cameron?
I don't know, I've never heard Dave Cameron talk
It's a joke. Dave talks fast, but does not stutter.
So he sounded like Jeff Sullivan?
It wouldn't be an issue if you were to give a brief explanation.
In other words please don't post comments like that because they are of extremely limited value
is what someone with a heart of gold would say.
A heart of gold, while valuable to others,

would seem to not be a very good quality to strive for personally. I mean, I know gold is one of the more pliable elements, but I do not think it would make a good compression simply from electrical shocks.

It's hypoallergenic, so there's that.
Gee, it sure seems like a silly thing to say then doesn't it?
Washburn on the trade rumors
“If I’m traded, it means something bad happened in the next 10 days. That’s the last thing I want to happen. I love winning, and we’re winning here. We have maybe the best group of guys I’ve ever been a part of, and that’s saying a lot. That ‘02 team in Anaheim (that won the World Series), we were a great team. Everybody loved each other. We had fun. We did whatever it took to win. That’s the exact same feel I have with this ballclub. I’m very happy to be a part of it, and yeah, I want to continue to be a part of it.”

Larry Stone

The Wash interviews, I half expected him to say something like:

“I’ve been overachieving and the team has good pitching depth. If they can trade me for a useful replacement, that would be lovely.”

The way Wash interviews
Shutup Jarrod. Just shutup. I'm starting to actually respect and like you.

I hope something happens the next 10 days or whatever. Either gettting us within 2-3 games of first or dropping us 7-8 back. This 4-5 game stuff is making it difficult to decide what to do with guys like Washburn.

I still say deal him if the prospect or prospects are right, but I like this group of guys we got in the clubhouse right now, and I have to admit, I’d feel bad if this group starts getting broken up, although it’s probably best in the long term

His interviews have been quite honest recently

I enjoyed the part where he calls bullshit on players who say they don’t pay attention to trade rumors.

Has he said

“I’m much happier now throwing to Rob Johnson with an incredible outfield defense to bail me out instead of throwing to Kenji and having Raul watch fly balls drop for doubles?”

He's admitted sometimes that he's been lucky.
It's easy to admit you are lucky when you have $40,000,000 in the bank.
Seems amazingly difficult for most athletes to admit.
He's always been honest and upfront.
So if Washburn keeps up his current pace for 75 or so more innings this year

He will have accumulated enough WAR during the past 4 years to actually earn his contract. Who would have thought.

Idiots probably
Where's the process/results pic?
Although I'm pretty sure fangraphs uses FIP for pitcher value stuff

which is quite a bit kinder to Washburn than tRA.

Actually, I don't know if this is true or not.

Looks like Fangraphs uses an RA version of FIP. Also, I don’t know which metric makes him look better over the years, but this year his FIP is well above average and he’s just below average in tRA.

Why would the Phillies want Washburn?

Come on, have some common sense. Why would the Phillies want an extreme flyball pitcher like Washburn pitching in their little bandbox? 9 flyouts to start the game? His ERA would double to Jamie Moyer level if he pitches in Phillies.

This page might answer your question.

Here

The Phillies aren't the smartest organization in baseball and Washburn is a veteran with playoff experience and a shiny ERA.

Plus he probably would be an upgrade for them.

Happ is pitching great, we know about Cole Hamels, and he's awesome,

They just signed Pedro, and Moyer is going to stay in the rotation because of his contract and local ties. I am sorry, but Washburn isn’t a upgrade to the Phillies.

Only 2 or 3 of the Phillies starters are league average or better. Pedro is too much of a wild card right now he can be great or suck.
I don't think anyone here is saying Washburn is going to Philadelphia.

Nobody cares where Washburn goes, as long as he returns something of interest. Philly just so happens to be doing their homework on Washburn, hence the talk around here.

You just cited Pedro Martinez and Jamie Moyer as reason they don't need Moyer? How do you expect to be taken

seriously?

*need Washburn
Phillies might not be the smartest organization in baseball,

but the are the defending WS champ and have one of the best farm systems in baseball. I would love the Mariners to be in their shoes.

The Phillies would want Washburn because we are smarter than they are
Is Jarrod Washburn's 1.06 WHIP sustainable?

He’s leading the whole AL in WHIP now. How the heck is that possible? He’s only given up 31 extra base hits in 126 IP. That’s pretty awesome for a flyball pitcher.

This is how.

WHIP is a stat the relies on defense. It’s not a very good way to analyze a pitcher. Plus a flyball pitcher will have a lower WHIP in general.

Oh shit guys image size sorry.

Rookie mistake, I’ll go get my coffee now.

I like this picture though.
I think I speak for many when I say we will forgive you this time.

What a face.

Another tool that helps WHIP.

So damn sexy.
i'd do him.

i would.

I have not read a single commment.

Nor have I watched the game. I am probably LLLJing a bit, but I just got drunk with my dad and hoped to see 51-44 upon my refresh of LL. I am happy and satisfied. Go M’s! :)

We won and I had a great day. Hooray for the M’s! :D

DOLPHIN DOLPHIN
I think all of his strikes should be called Ke ke ke ke's now because that's the sound dolphins make
Zerg rush?
Rec'd for the reference. I'm actually kind of surprised there aren't at least a few more starcraft references around here.
He actually registered a swinging strike on it today!

Maybe more than one…haven’t checked.

By Miguel Cabrera no less!
We should send Washburn some Captain Morgan

He’s our captain and we’re all on his ship. Sorry Felix, you’re too young to be a Captain!

I am pleased by the fact that we are 7 games over .500!
Wahsburn should be annointed a knight in Felix's court and granted an exension on his super fucking-I'll-fuck-you-and-make-it-hurt-powers.
He throws balls full of semen and hate.

He might have eaten toxic spillage from the Sound that has made him angry. You won’t like him when he’s angry.

What does he turn into when he's angry?

A dolphin, or a GREEN dolphin?

An angry HUGE dolphin.
Green is pretty redundant for thewaters he's in.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST GUYS THESE ARE NOT OPEN THREADS
FUCKING LISTEN TO ME FOR ONCE IN YOUR FUCKING LIVES
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2009/7/22/958774/a-friendly-notice

DID I FUCKING STUTTER

GOD
There there

There there there there there

He makes a good point, but sadly I learned a long time ago that people do not read directions.
Reading gets in the way of me saying whatever I goddamn well want to whenever I goddamn well feel like it!
I know you're upset, and I'm not trying to start anything, but I'm curious.

I’ve always kind of wondered how is the result of an Angels game, and hence our standing in the division, not “on-topic” when discussing our game result of the day? Is it just discussing specific plays that irks you? Because if, say, Nathan had gotten the final out and I’d simply posted “Sweet Angels lose. Only 4.5 back!” that would’ve surely been on-topic.

Posting about a result is fine

Posting about something happening during the game is not because it encourages further game thread-style conversation.

Also I’M FUCKING MAD

Can we post them in the game thread? Since it's....a game thread?
Yeah all this stuff belongs in the game threads

That’s why they’re there.

Well in that case, the Angels just fucking won
AGAINST JOE FUCKING NATHAN!
If Joe Nathan cannot complete a fucking 2 run save against them, I don't see how the fuck they're ever going to fucking lose

Fuck

They've won back-to-back with 5% or less chance to win the game.

But it feels like about 15 in a row.

Let's stop now.
FUCKEDY FUCK FUCK.
I understand not wanting constant updates, after yesterday

I think simply stating the outcome and maybe a brief summary of frustrations about how the Angels never lose would be more appropriate? Or maybe it should just all go in the game threads. Up to Jeff.

Danger! High Voltage by Electric Six would be a great song for David Aardsma to come out to
Only 4.5 out of the wildcard!!!!

Optimism

I don't even understand how we are closer to that
Boston got swept by the Texas Rangers.
Wait the Rangers swept the Sox?!
Yes that was a thing that happened.
I know the Angels are flawed and getting incredibly lucky...

But I’m really starting to think we have a better shot at the wild card. I mean Boston is clearly not great (unless they swing something for Halladay) and the Rangers are due to fade. The Rays scare me, but I think we might just have a shot.

Boston is very, very, very good
Ha ha...yeah...I'm just in denial because we worked the Rangers and they worked Boston.

I’m dumb like that.

The Red Sox are bound to make moves

and they’re fucking good as is. Our top of the rotation and our defense is the only thing that comes close to them.

I know I'm contradicting almost all evidence I always use to seperate smart fans from dumb fans, but...

I dunno. I just don’t get a feeling with Boston that they’re as good as all indicators say they should be. I thought the entire year (ok…excluding games 3-5 of the series with the Yanks) that Boston would win it the last two times they did, but I don’t get the same vibe.

In my gut I feel better about beating Boston than the Angels

but that’s just because recently Boston has been sliding and the Angels have been…whatever.

Their offense is only above-average and their defense is bad

but the pitching staff is phenomenal from top to bottom. Our only WC hope is that the AL East beats up on itself.

You hear that, Rays?

Go make a trade. Just keep Scott Kazmir away from the Angels.

Also simple math

We are chasing two teams in the division. We are chasing three teams in the WC. There are no teams realistically chasing us in the division. There are a couple Central teams in the WC.

That's the spirit.
Was Nick Adenhart sacrified to provide the Angels 7 more years of good luck?
I'm beginning to think it's an Angels in the Outfield scenario

Fucking Christopher Lloyd.

Worst mainstream propaganda film of all-time.

I’m working on a piece that proves such.

Propaganda for what?

The mainstream?

Pro-Angels.

Who clearly are a team that has made a pact with Satan. When I said mainstream was meaning that it was maliciously marketed as a family movie, when it was really more “Triumph of the Will” than “Lion King.”

Plus it teaches kids that God likes to help you cheat.
I say go back and watch the original, which featured the Pirates

No pact there.

Grr...

I liked this movie as a kid.
Angels=performance enhancers.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.