SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

Some Quick Thoughts On Game 4 Of The ALCS

I understand the Giants and the Phillies played a game of their own this afternoon, but the Yankees and Rangers just played for four hours and five minutes, and I don't remember anything that happened earlier. I think there were sandwiches. Some things were red, and some things were yellow. My mother speaks glowingly of the Before-Time. I wonder what things I have done, and what places I have been.

  • What's most incredible to me isn't that the Rangers have won three of four games against the Yankees. The Rangers are a good team. They're well-built for the playoffs. Winning three of four was a distinct possibility. No, what's most incredible to me is the way in which the Rangers have won three of four games against the Yankees.

    The Yankees won Game 1 by a run, needing to stage a late rally from a 5-0 deficit. Game 1 was very close, and the Yankees eked it out.

    The Rangers won Game 2 by five runs. The Rangers won Game 3 by eight runs. The Rangers won Game 4 by seven runs.

    Over the last three games, the Rangers have outscored the Yankees 25-5. Granted, Monday's game was close until the ninth, and Tuesday's game was close until the seventh. But Monday, Cliff Lee took the Yankees right out of the game, and Tuesday, the air came out of the sails when Bengie Molina went deep. The Rangers have gotten in control, and once in control, they've been able to pile on such that the Yankees' last at bat is little but a formality.

    The Rangers have played two straight games in Yankee Stadium - the first road ALCS games in franchise history - and there have maybe been 10,000 combined people on hand to witness the final out in each. The Rangers have just choked the life out of that place, and the team that plays in it.

    Obviously, it isn't over. What's 3-1? The Yankees just need to win three games in a row. It happens all the time. The Rangers just did it.

    What's nuts is that it feels like it's over. The Rangers have been that good, and the Yankees have looked that bad.

    The Rangers are a rival of ours, but one can't help but be impressed by what they've put together.

  • In the bottom of the second, Robinson Cano hit a controversial solo home run to right field. As Nelson Cruz went up to attempt a leaping catch, some fans reached over and appeared to make contact with his glove, and the ball came down behind the wall. Cruz and Ron Washington argued, but the dinger was upheld. Me, I agree with the decision. Though Cruz's glove was touched, I think the ball was uncatchable. Regardless, no matter what you think about the call or non-call, the one point everybody can agree on is that the fan who wound up with the ball will have a miserable life, with miserable kids and a miserable wife. His only escape will be rapping that line, right there, that I just wrote for him.

  • Earlier in the series, the TBS announcers went on and on about how the Rangers couldn't afford to be stranding baserunners against a team like the Yankees. It's only fitting that, tonight, it was the Yankees who couldn't afford to be stranding baserunners against the Rangers. I know Texas won by seven. But consider the following situations:

    Bottom 4: Bases loaded, one out
    Bottom 5: 1st and 2nd, none out
    Bottom 8: Bases loaded, one out

    Out of those situations - which took place when the game was still winnable - the Yankees squeezed all of one run. One run, against the Ranger bullpen, with that lineup, in that stadium. The Yankees wound up on the business end of a blowout, but they had their opportunities.

  • Of course, there were two factors that contributed to their inability to score more than one run out of those chances:

    (1) With the bases loaded in the fourth, Brett Gardner grounded a ball several feet to Elvis Andrus' right. Andrus ranged over, made a diving stop, found his footing, and threw to third for a force out. At first, that didn't look like a grounder any shortstop could reach. Then, it didn't look like Andrus would be able to do anything more than keep it in the infield. He reached the ball, and he got an out. So few shortstops can make the play, and it's appropriate that, in the very next inning, Andrus slapped an identical groundball right past Derek Jeter. It wasn't a webgem, but Andrus' effort made a monumental difference, and I don't know that the Rangers would've won without it.

    (2) With the bases loaded in the eighth, Nick Swisher stepped in against Darren Oliver, and on a 0-1 count, Oliver threw a low inside breaking ball that barely clipped Swisher's right pant leg. That hit batsman should've driven in the Yankees' fourth run. However, the umpire didn't rule it a hit batter, and Swisher, for whatever reason, didn't argue. Swisher would pop out to shallow center later in the at bat. I know it's kind of lame that a batter can be given a base when a pitched ball makes slight contact with the fabric of his uniform, but that's the rule, and Swisher should've walked to first base. The win expectancy impact of keeping Swisher in the box was about 10%.

    It'd been a little while since we saw an umpire make an important mistake.

  • From the bottom of the fifth through the end of the game, the Yankees got outscored 8-0, they got outhomered 4-0, and they lost Mark Teixeira for the rest of the playoffs to a hamstring injury. 

  • The top of the sixth was interesting for a bunch of reasons. Nelson Cruz took second base on a fly out to center. Set up by Cruz's advance, David Murphy drew an intentional walk to bring Bengie Molina to the plate with two outs. A.J. Burnett remained in the game at 97 pitches. And Molina tucked a first-pitch fastball inside the left field foul pole for a three-run homer that turned a 3-2 deficit into a 5-3 lead.

    There is so much to talk about in there. Aggressive baserunning. How things wouldn't have happened as they did had Cruz not taken second base. Joe Girardi leaving his starter in there even though he'd already done more than anybody expected. But Bengie Molina - statistically, that's the biggest hit in Rangers playoff history. And emotionally, I have to figure it's not even close. That was a lead-changer and a complete momentum-changer, and it happened with two outs, in that stadium, in that game. I don't know if the final score will diminish Molina's blast in any way, but that was the kind of home run that people remember for decades. That was a home run that put 'World Series' in everyone's mind.

0 recs  |  61 comments

Comments

And now... images.

This guy...

This... thing.

Obi-Wan can sense it...

And it was true...

And Nolan? Nolan just laughed.

Meanwhile, A-Rod's soul was crushed in the cosmic singularity that is Bengie Molina.

Recced for Nolan Ryan's nightmarish countenance.

That would make for an awesome Halloween mask. You could just follow around children yelling at them to ring doorbells until their arms fall off because Nolan Ryan don’t believe in no damn ring counts.

I reposted this ...

over at CC. Hope that’s cool with you. It’s just too brilliant.

None of these are mine.

The internet is just a repost of a repost of a post reposted.

Since I was in the game thread freaking out about the Cano homer

I want to say that the homer was indeed legit, but I think going to replay for that was appropriate.

Nelson Cruz was not going to catch that ball, but I can think of maybe a dozen outfielders who may have had a decent chance at it because of their wall-climbing ability.

I have to disagree.

You can debate all day whether the ball was catchable or not (I think the ball was clearly within range of being caught….. and I think it’s arguable that Cruz’ leap could have gone the needed extra six inches without the guy pressing down on his glove).

But two things are indisputable:

  1. The play should have been reviewed.
  2. There was intentional fan interference. By rule, at the moment Cruz’ glove is touched (which nobody disputes), the ball is dead, which means Cano, at the very least, is stopped on the basepaths (probably around 2nd base). That’s the rule.
    3.16
    When there is spectator interference with any thrown or batted ball, the ball shall be dead at the moment of interference and the umpire shall impose such penalties as in his opinion will nullify the act of interference.
    APPROVED RULING: If spectator interference clearly prevents a fielder from catching a fly ball, the umpire shall declare the batter out.
    Rule 3.16 Comment: There is a difference between a ball which has been thrown or batted into the stands, touching a spectator thereby being out of play even though it rebounds onto the field and a spectator going onto the field or reaching over, under or through a barrier and touching a ball in play or touching or otherwise interfering with a player. In the latter case it is clearly intentional and shall be dealt with as intentional interference as in Rule 3.15.

    3.15
    ….. If the interference is intentional, the ball shall be dead at the moment of the interference and the umpire shall impose such penalties as in his opinion will nullify the act of interference.
It clearly should have been reviewed

but I’m not so sure on the interference part. You could argue that Cruz’s glove was out of the field of play when contact was made.

You could argue that Cruz’s glove was out of the field of play when contact was made.

You could argue that, but you’d be wrong. From ESPN:

Man, that should definitely have been first and goal from the warning track after that play.
Close

Regardless, I do not think the ball was catchable.

Catchable or not it is interference.

That they got away with it in Yankee Stadium should surprise exactly no one.

I'm having trouble with the "clearly prevents a fielder from catching a fly ball" clause

But then I’m not good with rules. Even if that is rulebook interference, I don’t think it would’ve been ‘fair’ to take the homer away.

That's where this particular ruling has merit

I think it’s clear he could possibly have caught it, since the ball bounced on the top “counter” portion just over the outfield wall. But did the fans clearly prevent the fielder from catching it? I don’t think so. They gave the benefit of the doubt to the ball being hit over the wall, which I think is fair. It’s a 100 miles from the Jeffrey Maier play.

But if we were in the ALCS and the fielder was Ichiro, we would be burning down the world
I openly admit my stance is based on my own fan experience over the years.

The problem is I have seen fans in Safeco get called for interference on balls they touched on the seating side of the wall that a player had zero chance of catching. So why not be consistent?

If nothing else these fans needed to be removed from the game.

but look at the rule above

there’s nothing in the part i cited about “ball must be catchable”.

There is one basic point with no “cathcable ball” part connected to it:

a spectator going onto the field or reaching over, under or through a barrier and touching a ball in play or touching or otherwise interfering with a player

This clearly happened. According TO THE RULE, it is automatically intentional interference and should be a dead ball.

As I said before, we can argue as the day is long if the ball was catchable (and it’s close enough that there would be an argument on either side), but that’s not relevant to the rule above.

Good point and I agree

I didn’t read the rule carefully enough. “If spectator interference clearly prevents a fielder from catching a fly ball, the umpire shall declare the batter out.” But it only needs to be a fan touching or otherwise interfering for it to be declared a dead ball. It’s pretty clear from these photos that interference occurred. They don’t even have to touch his glove. The fans reached out over the playing field and over the fielder’s glove.

My problem is simply them not using replay at all.

It makes me worried that if they ever implement more replay in baseball, it’ll be pointless because the egotistical fucksticks in blue will never want to use it. That same asshole (Jim Reynolds) who didn’t call fan interference was the one who called Berkman’s foul “fair” initially. Basically he fucked up twice and only once did they review it.

Disappointed that there's no Giants/Phillies recap or talk in this post.
You've surely been a baseball fan long enough to know every game is a Yankee game

As much as I don’t want the Rangers to win the WS, it’s sure fun watching them put a beating on the Yankees right now.

Maybe I'm a bad fan but, out of the four remaining teams, I'm rooting for the Rangers to win the WS.

Smartly-run organization, least douchebulb-y fanbase of the remaining clubs, Cliff Lee!, and it may up the competitive pressure in the division in an AL East kind of way…

Are Giants fans really all that bad?

I mean, that “Don’t Stop Believing” video is probably sufficient to give non-fans douchechills, but I’d say it’s about on par with the claw thing.

Some of the McCoven are all right but, on almost every other site/message board they're an insufferable lot.
Giants fans "Dont Stop Believing?"

I know that they do that at Dodger stadium… they don’t really do that at San Fran too do they?

Typical NorCal

always stealing genuine ideas from SoCal and making them douchey.

So that was a pretty appropriate response.
I wasn't serious
Doesn't make you a bad fan, you can root for whoever you want

I just don’t want the list of teams who have never made it to or won the World Series to shrink unless Seattle shrinks it. Looks like the “made” list is going to shrink, so I have to root for the NL.

It's cool. Next year we can have a Nats/M's World Series and that will be that.
I don't get why it even matters. The Rangers or the Giants winning the WS isn't going to make a World Series come to Seattle any sooner/later than if the Phillies did.
It matters because I'm a bitter, small hearted man who doesn't want a division rival to succeed
I know you!

This could be pdb's avatar!
All the things I probably wanted to talk about I completely forgot by the fifth inning of TEX/NYY
Cody Ross is getting some big hits lately
I hate orange
Even in Orange October?
OK, I do like Halloween/Dia de los Muertos orange
That's no excuse!

You have to recap events that you have no obligation to! It’s expected! People spend a lot of free time here! You owe them!

With Bengie Molina coming to the forefront of this series, its made me realize that he could potentially face a team in the world series that he was traded from this season.

I wonder if that’s ever happened before.

Are Mariner fans as conflicted about this series as Angel fans?

Lose/Lose situation :(

I had to admit I am

on the one hand I enjoy how epically New York is getting beat.

On the other its the Rangers :(

Objectively I hate the idea of the Rangers winning

but when I sit and watch, it’s all that I want. Maybe that means I’m short-sighted. But Bengie Molina’s home run was awesome.

I'm loving watching the Yankees get utterly throttled at home by a team like Texas.

If the Rangers were winning all these games close, I’d be more neutral.

I’m still rooting the Rangers to get swept in the Series

I have no problem "rooting" for the Yankees

even while stating that I like the Rangers, by and large. I just don’t like, as a M’s fan, what their winning represents. If the Mariners futility drags on…and on…we’re going to start being referred to as the Cubs of the American League. Except less lovable, more loser. I liked that Texas could share in that particular misery with us.

I remember when this group of never made the series was six deep, wasn’t that long ago. Then Astros, Rockies, Rays…seemingly in quick order.

Now we’re going to be left sitting with the Nationals…and there will be no denying our place in the historical pecking order.

When you become a Yankee, you automatically become a person I want nothing good to ever happen to.

So it’s the lesser of two evils, but I don’t even think the Rangers are evil. They’re just not a team I would like to win the World Series, which is fine because the Giants are going to win it all.

I try not to confuse "Yankees" with the George Steinbrenner and the insufferable fanbase.

They’re the ones I want to feel pain. The players? I don’t really care about the players. At least not like the old days. Paul O’Neil could go fuck a couch, and Jeter gets more attention than he deserves, but overall the players don’t bug me as much as the deceased owner and the fucking “27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS 27 CHAMPIONSHIPS” assholes fleeing the stadium in droves when their team is losing a playoff game. In the 7th inning.

It's almost a shame that I feel conflicted.

It’s a really nice story for the Rangers who’ve cultivated enough talent to put a winning product on the field. They’ve had to deal with the bankruptcy. They went all-in trading for Cliff Lee to make a big playoff push and it’s paying off. Even their supporting moves are making big contributions. Not to mention the Rangers have been essentially curb stomping the Yankees. Watching the Rangers gun for their first World Series would be better than watching the Yankees gun for their 28th.

I don’t even mind that it will help the Rangers financially going forward. I just hate that the Mariners have been scrambling to put on a competitive team since 2004 and the field of “never has” is rapidly getting smaller. That pool is looking really small to the point where people will enjoy throwing that fact in our faces more than ever. Even worse considering the franchise record for wins in a season is 116….

More so, because the Angels have actually won something

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.