Remember this the next time someone tells you that baseball is unpredictable.
It is. Over individual games, baseball is absolutely, completely unpredictable. And there's nothing anybody can do about it. You might think you know something interesting. You might actually know something interesting. You might have uncovered some key that seems really significant. But you just don't know how much that key is going to end up mattering over a period of nine innings, if it matters at all. Nine innings isn't a lot of time. They go by quickly, even when it seems like they don't. Nine innings don't allow things to balance out and play to the averages.
Odds. So what about odds? Odds are interesting right up to the point at which a game is being played. The odds remain in play - forever in play - but baseball is a series of individual events with binary outcomes. A guy won't get 30% of a hit. He'll get a hit, or he won't get a hit.
And you can't be real certain about the odds you come up with anyway, because you don't know how a guy's going to feel. You know how he'll feel on average, but you don't know if this guy's wrist is a little sore. You don't know if this guy's dealing with a dry eye. You don't know if this guy doesn't have a good feel for his cutter. The very fact that people aren't static is a big part of what makes baseball so random over small samples.
Coming in, Cliff Lee was a lock. That was the consensus opinion. Lee had been pitching as well as any pitcher anyone had ever seen, and that was against AL opponents. In an NL ballpark, against an NL lineup, the sky was the limit. Why wouldn't Lee be able to control the game and spin eight strong innings?
Anyone, I think, would've been willing to acknowledge that Lee wasn't a guarantee before the game. Even the most confident of all Lee supporters would've admitted that, sure, we can't be certain that Lee's going to go and dominate. But pretty much everyone assumed it was going to happen. If the Giants were to win, it would be because Tim Lincecum threw a shutout, or because Lee made one or two mistakes, the way Roy Halladay did back in Game 1 of the NLCS.
No one considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, Lee would go and get his ass kicked.
And Lee got his ass kicked. He gave up seven runs in 4.2 innings, getting yanked before completing the fifth. He threw strikes, but he didn't look like himself, and the Giants pounced. It shouldn't seem so foreign - Lee did allow at least six runs in a game five times during the year - but here we are, fresh off a game in which arguably the best playoff starter of all time got destroyed, and no one's really sure how it happened. How was it the Giants - not the Yankees, but the Giants - who were able to bring Lee back to Earth?
Baseball. This happens. Nothing and nobody is a guarantee, and it's a testament to Lee's prior excellence that he was nearly considered one before. But no one's immune to the occasional stinker, just as everyone's capable of the occasional breakout. Cliff Lee got knocked around. Freddy Sanchez had four hits and three doubles. Baseball. Of all the World Series predictions floating around out there - the thousands, or tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands - none of them figured this was how the series was going to start.
Arguably the best pitching matchup of the month turned into the month's highest-scoring game, in an NL ballpark, with two NL lineups. So what if it probably wouldn't happen again? It's happened now. It's within the realm of potential outcomes. And it's an outcome that can never be written off.
There's just so much to take away from this game. So many lessons. But lessons that will be forgotten next week, if not tomorrow. People are still going to try to predict how games work out. And many of their methodologies will be sound. Pitching matchups are important. Splits are important. Defensive alignments and nagging injuries are important. On any given day, though, there's just no telling. And that's where all predictions fail.
Remember this game. Remember what Freddy Sanchez and the Giants did to Cliff Lee. Heed the lessons and you'll become a smarter fan for it.
Vladimir Guerrero is right-handed and awful defensively. David Murphy is left-handed and good defensively. You can see how Murphy is the better bet against Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain in an NL ballpark. And yet, Ron Washington insists on keeping his cleanup guy in the lineup, despite having a number of very good reasons not to.
It was pretty clear that despite Vlad's issues in right field in Game 1, Ron Washington is committed to playing him in Game 2.
4 recs | 41 comments
Willie Mays is pretty damn old.
If he doesn’t feel like being driven somewhere and having to go out in front of a big crowd for some ceremony when he’s not feeling well I say give him a break.
ignacio - October 28, 2010
Pretty sure that Jeff's tongue was firmly planted in his cheek on that one.
Just a guess
Idahofan - October 28, 2010
I didn't watch the game,
but Mark Lowe has a World Series ERA over 40.
Wooooooooo sell high!
doublemazaa - October 28, 2010
He barely pitched leading up to the post-season.
Seemed like an odd roster move to me.
Thingray - October 28, 2010
As if this was the first thing I said that made me look like an asshole,
but I think this is why I still view Sabrmetrics as a somewhat useful tool, but not the be-all-end-all indicator many subscribe to? How can you quantify a guy like Lee having one of his few bad days and justify some of the stats? Lee is merely an example. Also, I suck at mathematics.
kevin_ess - October 28, 2010
You just have to know how to use the numbers, and when they are applicable
The point of this post is that 900 innings are a lot more predictable than 9.
miracle_max - October 28, 2010
Yeah, part of understanding statistics is knowing the volatility of a sample as small as a single game.
And that anything can happen in that short of a time span.
Mariner John - October 28, 2010
There isn't a single intelligent sabermetrician who see stats as the be-all-end-all indicator.
Once people stop accusing them of that the discussion can become more amiable.
Sec 108 - October 28, 2010
Cliff Lee's amazing 2010 stats include those five starts where he gave up more than six runs. I think Jeff's point is that no matter how much we know, the randomness that can happen in one single game will always humble us.
Decatur - October 28, 2010
Thanks for the post Jeff
Why does playoff baseball always coincide with me being incredibly busy? Well at least the only thing between me and a good Halloween party is 12 more hours of writing a miserable paper. So long as an embolism doesn’t pop in my brain and I die mid-keystro…
Trenchtown - October 28, 2010
Did anyone notice
what it said at the bottom of the screen when Elvis Andrus came to the plate for the first at bat of the Series?
dlukas - October 28, 2010
Hint:
It said “first player in World Series history named Elvis.”
There are some things you can just keep to yourself, stats guy.
dlukas - October 28, 2010
And then there was the McCarver comparison
paraphrasing: “One’s middle name was Aron, one’s middle name is Augusto”. He went on to list other facts about the Elvii that were supposed to be interesting but were really OH MY GOD MAN SHUT UP BEFORE I REACH THROUGH THE TV AND PUNCH YOUR THROAT.
pdb - October 28, 2010
Thank god for a noisy bar where you can't hear the play by play.
msb - October 28, 2010
I'd go with 'Elvese'
Along the same lines as ‘hypothesis’.
Torjazz - October 28, 2010
The plural of hypothesis is hypotheses
The plural of Elvis would then be Elveses, which just looks like something out of a Santa Claus nightmare.
pdb - October 28, 2010
First and Ten happened to be on TV this morning when I was getting ready for work...
Nelly was a guest on the show and they were debating Cliff Lee’s bad start. Skip Bayless wanted to make a big deal about it, “What’s wrong with Cliff Lee, how could he lose under the pressure, what happened” looking for some explanation. Nelly said “It’s a fluke. He’s the best command pitcher in the game and he didn’t have his command this night, it’s a fluke.”
Yes, there can be explanations and excuses and reasonable reasons as to why a pitcher like Cliff Lee had one of his worst starts of the year in game 1 of the World Series. But it’s not a reflection on him as a pitcher, these things happen and we should expect them to happen every once in awhile.
The moral of the story is that Nelly was the smartest sports mind on that particular ESPN show.
Kenneth Arthur - October 28, 2010
I have a 16 year old cat who shows no interest in sports that would be the smartest sports mind on any ESPN show
pdb - October 28, 2010
ESPN is scary because it shows you just how low
The lowest common denominator is that the station panders to. My guess is most of these people are Boise State fans
Trenchtown - October 28, 2010
Blue!
msb - October 28, 2010
Well sure, but that cat is 16.
Talk to me when kitties can start hosting Around the Horn.
Kenneth Arthur - October 28, 2010
Pretty sure he'd also be able to host that better than whoever does it now
pdb - October 28, 2010
Sports Meowing!
Kenneth Arthur - October 28, 2010
?
msb - October 28, 2010
I'm giving the Blue Collar Kitty 12 points for looking into the camera.
Thingray - October 28, 2010
Joe Morgan remembered that Freddy Sanchez was a batting champ
he also said a whole bunch of ridiculously inane things that I thankfully forgot.
bluemax - October 28, 2010
He also gave Michael Young a pass on making an error while playing third because he was amazing as a shortstop and looks uncomfortable now playing third.
Decatur - October 28, 2010
Even though he nobly volunteered to make the move
[snerk]
msb - October 28, 2010
I was thoroughly confused by the McCarver 2 out diatribe.
I think he even confused himself and it seemed to trail off at the end.
hcoguy - October 28, 2010
Cliff Lee's performance
How did he look? I didn’t see the game.
His fundamental line doesn’t look too bad: 24 batters faced, 7 Ks, 1 BB, 4 groundballs, 5 flyballs, no homerun. That’s pretty much a usual line for him, isn’t it? 8 hits on 16 balls in play is a rather ridiculous BAPIB, but that is probably not his fault. It seems to me that this outcome is even more random than Jeff’s post suggest.
vj - October 28, 2010
He just never got in his groove
Even when he wasn’t allowing runs (in the first few innings), he was giving up some good hits.
Whereas Lincecum settled down after a poor start, Lee never really did. I mean it was a walk of all things that led to the biggest part of the Giant’s outburst in the 5th.
skywaker9 - October 28, 2010
overlooked the HBP
so that’s 8 hits on 15 balls in play…
vj - October 28, 2010
His D didn't help
But he still didn’t get the job done.
skywaker9 - October 28, 2010
This is a clue
http://www.baseballanalytics.org/baseball-analytics-blog/2010/10/28/no-separation.html
Jeff Sullivan - October 28, 2010
Clint Barmes made $335,000 in 2006
Being Clint barmes in 2006 beats being HititHere in 2006, when I was living in a studio apartment in Federal Way and eating dry ramen with peanut butter.
HititHere - October 28, 2010
Any year in the big leagues tops any year I've ever had.
Thingray - October 28, 2010
Well you know what they say
Good hitting beats good pitching.
nathaniel dawson - October 28, 2010
Or lucky hitting.
Thingray - October 28, 2010
Guess he changed his mind: Guerrero taken out of Rangers lineup for Game 2
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/baseball/mlb/10/28/guerrero.game2.ap/
Eyebrows - October 28, 2010 via mobile
Human Target is awesome.
Worth watching, it;s a surprisingly clever show.
ambrosia2112 - October 28, 2010
They've pestered me so much about it,
I wouldn’t enjoy it even if it was good. Plus, not my kind of show anyway.
Thingray - October 28, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.