SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

Haha Angels

The American League results of the winter's biggest punchline are out, and the good news is that both Ichiro and Franklin Gutierrez managed to pick up Gold Gloves. The awesome news is that Torii Hunter did not. Hunter and Ichiro each came into the year riding a streak of nine consecutive awards, but only Ichiro has made it into double digits. As much as these things don't matter, at least they're actively not mattering in our favor.

Voting on these honors is done by AL managers and coaches, and, as has long been apparent, this is an imperfect system. We don't even need to bring UZR or +/- into this - you just can't expect much accuracy from a pool of voters who are basing their decisions on a handful of plays they observed over the course of the year. Sometimes people joke that a player only won because he made a highlight-reel play back in June, but then those are, after all, the plays that stand out in one's memory. So, who knows?

There's no sense in pointing out all that's wrong with the Gold Glove process. Not again, not anymore. Everybody knows it's screwed up. We're all the preachers, and we're all the choir. The only reason these awards matter at all is that the players like receiving them, so rather than complain about how unfair and subjective it all is, I'm just going to be happy that, in a season so terrible, two Mariners were recognized, and one for the first time. The first Gold Glove is the hardest to win, so kudos to Gutierrez for locking it up despite a mediocre year at the plate. He earned this, whether he earned it in 2010 or in 2009.

And, of course, Ichiro's totally amazing. There should probably be an annual Ichiro Award, that's always given to Ichiro, until he retires, at which point the award is no longer handed out.

Derek Jeter. Hilarious. But Ichiro and Gutierrez? Whatever. We can bitch, or we can be happy. I choose to be happy. In 2010, we've all bitched enough.

15 recs  |  49 comments

Comments

There should probably be an annual Ichiro Award, that’s always given to Ichiro, until he retires, at which point the award is no longer handed out.

Couldn’t agree more.

Okay, I have to ask the (currently) four people that rec'd this comment,

why?

There are no recs on the post itself and this comment consists of nothing more than agreeing with a specific sentence of the post. So you agree with eyebleaf agreeing with Jeff?

I don’t get it.

I thought it was because people liked seeing a fan of another team praising Ichiro.
But I agree that it's odd.
That's my exact reason for reccing this comment.
I even recced Prof. Hubert J. Farnsworth for being on the money

although I was late to the thread and didn’t get a chance to rec the eyebleaf’s comment.

Question

What’s the point of rec’ing posts on the front page?

Practically, there is no point
It's a sign of appreciation.

Conversely I would ask what the point of not reccing is, just because it’s practically meaningless. It makes people feel good about their contributions, so I find it odd that there are people that don’t do it as though they are taking a stand.

But Matthew’s question is important and I would also like to know the answer.

There you go, buddy.

Nice work. Keep it up.

If eyebleaf has singled out a highlight of the post that everyone particularly appreciates, I think it makes a lot of sense.
I assumed people would give the recognition to the person who wrote the quoted passage.

That is why it makes no sense to me

reading is hard and reading more than two lines might as well be Ulysses
tl;dr

“Too Long; Didn’t Rec”

I don't think it's a question of recognition.

As you pointed out in your initial question, eyebleaf didn’t really add anything, he just called attention to a specific line. In this usage, I think the rec is serving as a “seconded”. They saw a line repeated that they liked, and recced the comment as a way of saying “I agree, that was a good line”. I don’t think these people are particularly concerned about who “gets the credit” (my phrase, obviously, not yours). Jeff’s feelings didn’t weigh into the decision of where they stated their approval.

You're right. They should have just posted, "This" underneath the comment to show their agreement.
I thought the recs were hipster-ironic recs

Seeing as the comment in question has no subject line and a long signature. So it’s either ironic-hipster recs, pity recs, pile-on recs or confused-sheep recs. Or rec inflation.

I rec'd it because people were whining about it being rec'd.
No, no, no.

The Ichiro Award should still be handed out after Ichiro retires (in a few decades) to anyone who meets the high standards of the award. Which will likely be no one.

Byrnes should get a Mauve Glove
That's Gold Glove winner Franklin Gutierrez to you.

This feels like a “Oops sorry about last year Franklin”. Heres hoping this is the start to a long run.

I agree with this statement.
Gutierrez does not deserve the gold glove award with other names such as Gardner

But what the heck. As a Mariners fan, i’m happy for him

I think the whole "not getting an error the entire season" thing helped him out a bit.
Well deserved Ichiro, congrats!

The man never fails to amaze me.

Der-rek Jet-ter Der-rek Jet-ter

[clap clap clap]

So how many years in a row is that now in which a Mariner has won a gold glove?

Gotta be at least 20 years

Quoting my Facebook update....

“This is the 24th season the Mariners have won a Gold Glove, the longest current streak in the majors.”

This Facebook thing seems quite popular.
Passing fad

Count on it.

Mariners' Facebook page tells me 24.
Since Mark Langston in 1987.
Langston, also the first Mariner to earn one.

Excuse me, “earn.”

I figured Elvis Andrus had enough attention to win this year.

Doesn’t he have more “ESPN Web Gems” than Jeter? I thought that was the voting criterion.

I guess they figured Jeter should get one in his last year as a Yankee.
He will probably get it next year. You almost always get your first award a year after you first "earn" it.

It may be like the Hall of Fame voters who will not vote for someone in the first year of eligibility even though they know they will vote for the person in subsequent years even though the person has obviously done nothing in the ensuing year to enhance his HOF career. At least with the Gold Glove the person does have some degree of control by doing something positive in the waiting period.

Just watching Alexei Ramirez

During the couple series we played the White Sox made me think he deserved it, he was unbelievable against us.

Irritating martian twat.
When the Mariners sign Jeets there's gonna be a lot of pie in a lot of faces
We will win the world series!
Now all we need is a gold glove in left field. Will the Condor show up?

Is there any reason Casey Kotchman wouldn’t have won a gold glove had he played twenty more games? Although it’s not like he held a record for errorless innings or anything… oh wait….

"Is there any reason Casey Kotchman wouldn’t have won a gold glove had he played twenty more games?"

Not a good enough bat.

Playing for the Yankees would help too, apparently.
He wasn't that good this year in general and errors are not only a meaningless stat for those that like stats

It is also a profoundly meaningless stat for first baseman, since they barely make any errors anyway. I think even managers recognize that.

Just past a diving Jeter!

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.