It's perfect, really. It's the perfect twist ending. It's the twist ending no one ever expected, and it's the twist ending that upsets both fans of a direct rival and fans of a less direct rival that most people hate way more. The only thing I thought wasn't perfect was the timing, as I was bothered that the Cliff Lee news broke right as I sat down to dinner, but then, I sat down to dinner around 9pm in Oregon, which meant it was 11pm in Dallas and midnight in New York. How many Rangers fans didn't know? How many Yankees fans didn't know? How many Yankees fans are going to wake up in the morning and spit out their breakfast?
At first, I was aggravated by the timing. But then I thought about it. And the more I thought about it, the more I concluded the timing, like everything else, was perfect. I feel bad lumping Rangers fans in with Yankees fans because the former aren't at all like the latter in terms of their collective sense of entitlement, but rivals are rivals, and if there's no news to make fans of the team you like happy, then you can always fall back on news that makes fans of teams you don't like sad. Them bitches are going to wake up and have their whole Tuesdays ruined, if they haven't been ruined already.
Nothing about this isn't delightful.
- I don't even hate the Yankees in the way that baseball fans are supposed to hate the Yankees. I used to, but then I got bored of it, because it wasn't interesting, and besides, greater enemies had emerged. But at the same time, I've never liked the Yankees, and it brings me great joy that now they'll have to scramble for a fallback plan. Zack Greinke and his anxiety problems aren't a fit. The Rays won't trade Matt Garza within the division. The Yankees won't want Carl Pavano back. Carl Crawford's already gone. Jayson Werth's already gone. Adrian Beltre's blocked. And so on, and so forth.
You know what the Yankees have done this offseason? They've re-signed 77 combined years of Derek Jeter and Mariano Rivera. They lost Javier Vazquez, which might be a plus, but they also might've lost Andy Pettitte. And the one guy they had their hearts set on - the one guy who was born to be a Yankee, the one guy with proven playoff experience, the one guy who'd never wilt under the bright lights of the big city - got away. He got away to go re-join the team the Yankees beat in the Series two years ago.
In most everyone's mind, Cliff Lee has been destined to be a Yankee for the past 12 months, and I have to imagine the Yankees felt the same way, just as the Angels did about Crawford. And the way it's always been written is that, when the Yankees want a guy, they get him. So this is an unfamiliar circumstance. Brian Cashman will, of course, say all the right things, and they're still going to return a team that was very very good in 2010, but there has to be some panic. The consolation after the Yankees lost to the Rangers was that at least they'd sign the guy who beat them.
They didn't.
I don't think the Yankees are lost. I do think the Yankees are somewhere they didn't think they'd be. It's cold out, and we don't have a fireplace in our apartment, but tonight I don't need one.
- It's only been a few hours since the news broke, but a popular storyline so far has been that Lee left a lot of money on the table to sign with a team for which he badly wanted to play. And that sounded great until the figures came out. Here are the details of the best contracts offered:
Phillies: Five years for $107.5m, with a $12.5m sixth-year buyout and a $27.5m sixth-year vesting option
Rangers: Six years for $138m, with a $23m seventh-year vesting option
Yankees: Six years for $132m, with a $16m seventh-year vesting option
All of those contracts promised Lee between $22-24m over the next several years, with vesting options at the end. Lee wound up taking the shortest, sacrificing one season, but in terms of average annual value lost, he didn't lose much. Assuming all options vest, he'll make a bit less than he would've with Texas, but well more than he would've with New York.
It's fine to say that Lee made a sacrifice by choosing Philadelphia, because that one season isn't negligible. But let's not make him out to be some kind of saint, and let's not make him out to be a guy who isn't interested in the money. He's going to make at least one hundred and twenty million dollars over the next five years. Lee's getting his money. It's been said that Lee followed his heart, but following one's heart is only an achievement when one's head raises an objection, and Philadelphia offered the best blend of money and odds of winning.
I know that Lee has openly discussed how much he enjoyed his three months in Philadelphia. I know there are reports out there that he's the one who initiated the talks that led to this agreement. I do not think an agreement would have been reached if the Phillies didn't offer what they did, and if they weren't as good as they are.
- I don't know if the 2011 Philadelphia Phillies will feature the best starting rotation of all time, but I do know that the Nationals are going to contact Carl Pavano's agent to tell him "forget it".
- I also know that the 2011 Philadelphia Phillies are in line to be the overwhelming favorite to represent the National League in the World Series. With that in mind, I will be the hundredth person to point out the following two things:
-the Phillies have gained Lee but lost Jayson Werth and, presumably, Joe Blanton
-the Giants went 5-2 against Lee, Halladay, Hamels, and Oswalt in the playoffs last year
The Phillies will deserve to be favorites, because they have put together an unbelievable rotation that forms much of the core of a really good team, but as we repeat every October, amazing shit can happen in a short series, and nothing is guaranteed. The Giants still have those same four arms.
- In Spring Training, Charlie Manuel's going to talk about the importance of the competition for the last spot in the bullpen, and everyone's going to laugh.
- After going over their schedule - if the Phillies wanted to, and if they skipped their fifth starter whenever an offday allowed, they could give 135 starts to their top four starters.
- There is, of course, a very strong argument to be made that the Rangers lucked out here. Lee is, after all, a 32 year old who depends on pinpoint command and whose game has little margin of error. Giving that guy six or seven years could end in disappointment for all parties involved, much like a night with your mother, and now the Rangers don't have to take such a risk.
On the other hand, the Rangers also don't have Cliff Lee. They probably won't have Adrian Beltre, either, unless they find someone dumb enough to take Michael Young, and while they're players for Greinke or Garza, those guys will take quality prospects to fetch.
It's always hard to properly weight the short-term and the long-term consequences of a big contract simultaneously. The risk inherent in the last few years of a long deal tends to be downplayed, as so much of the future is unpredictable. So we tend to focus on what's nearer, and the impression we're all left with today is that, hey, the Rangers don't have Cliff Lee anymore, all right. And that is good news for us. Just bear in mind that it could end up being good news for them, too.
- Assistant: Hey Ruben, so I've been crunching the numbers, and I think I have a few ideas.
Amaro: Mm hmm?
Assistant: Obviously, given the payroll situation, there's only limited flexibility, but there are a few avenues. The bench, for example, could stand to be upgraded, and there are guys out there like Jorge Cantu and Jerry Hairston Jr. and Bill Hall - guys who could play a lot of parts.
Assistant: Additionally some payroll space could be cleared, and while I know there's been trouble finding a taker for Joe Blanton, you have to figure that Ryan Madson would get some bites, and he's due four and a half million before he goes to the market.
Assistant: Deal Madson and you get a little more wiggle room. A little more space, either to go second-tier or spread around. Plus you also get what Madson brings back, which would probably be of value given his terrific numbers. Maybe that money can be held into the year for a midseason upgrade, since you never know when you'll have to find a spare part.
Amaro: I think I'm going to sign Cliff Lee.
Assistant: That doesn't really - no, no, that can't be done.
Amaro: Yeah, but I think I want to, so I'm gonna.
- The only thing that could make this deal more awesome is if the Rangers or Yankees trade for Joe Blanton and help the Phillies clear space.
Your dialogues are always so hilariously real sounding.
JamMasterJesus - December 14, 2010
I wonder if that's how he speaks to people.
I’m sure he does at times when bored.
LeftArrow2 - December 14, 2010
I wish I was a Phillies fan, that team is going to be [even more] fun to watch next year.
EnglishMariner - December 14, 2010
I agree. But it's also fun to be a Mariners fans
We got Ichiro, Felix and … Yeah it’s going to be exciting
Jose Lopez's swing - December 14, 2010
We lost Jose Lopez's swing tho
Seasons over.
LeftArrow2 - December 14, 2010
Yeah it's a pity
Jose Lopez's swing - December 14, 2010
Will you be trolling the Rockies blogs this year?
n8tron3030 - December 14, 2010
The Rangers also got a 1st-round pick
Given that and the argument that a big deal for Lee might have hamstrung them, the Yankees are the ones who really got screwed here. Yay!
Milendriel - December 14, 2010
Not a good 1st round pick though
Matthew - December 14, 2010
The Yankees got screwed at least twice.
The trade deadline and now.
JY - December 14, 2010
In discussing the options for the Yankees now, Erik Boland of New York Newsday says that Felix Hernandez is "not thought to be available".
That should count as screwed for the third time. He’s ours and you cannot have him.
Droid Rage - December 14, 2010
I heard that "rumor" on sports radio this morning.
If they traded Felix at this point, I would go take a giant dump off of the Safeco Field roof, then use my jersey to clean up before I burned it.
Thingray - December 14, 2010
I would want everything the Yankees have.
Plus Justin Upton.
MT Olson - December 14, 2010
You know we'd just get boned
It would look like a great trade initially and there would be much excitement, hype, and hoopla, then it would turn out we’d get a bunch of busts and the Yankees would laugh until they pissed their pants.
I heard some jackass on the radio saying we could get Phil Hughes, and Robinson Cano. Really? Cano would be so pissed he’d suddenly become Jose Lopez to force us to get rid of him. Nobody wants to play here man. And sure the Yankees would give us Hughes. And then we can give him the 1000 runs per game support he got last year. Oh wait…..
cjhenry41 - December 14, 2010
I don't think entitlement-derived delusions not coming true counts as getting screwed.
JY - December 14, 2010
Then what are entitlement-derived delusions good for then?
If you are not screwed if they do not come true, then they seem like plain old garden variety delusions with no special consequences.
Droid Rage - December 14, 2010
They're still going to probably get something of value.
It just won’t be the thing that was on top of their wishlist. That’s how I’d look at it.
JY - December 14, 2010
I love that Yankee writers can think "Since the Yankees lost out on [Joe Superstar], now they'll just go get [Jim Superstar] because they're the Yankees and of course they'll get him."
Just like they were so certain they’d get Lee, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear a lot of NY based writers continually suggest that the Yankees push to get Felix, or Greinke, or whoever. It doesn’t have to be realistic—as a Yankees writer, you can get away with saying anything! Wheeeee!
BrettJMiller - December 14, 2010
Well... it does seem to be how the Yankees operate. They hate to be outdone.
Kenneth Arthur - December 14, 2010
If Trading Felix can off-load couple bad contracts the M's currently have, plus getting back some good prospects, like Montero
and Gardner, why not? For example, Felix is only making 10M this year. His salary + Milton’s salary this year adds up to what the Yankees have budgeted for Lee. Then next year, when Felix gets up to the 18 – 20 M salary range, Milton is gone, and Felix’s salary would be less than what they budgeted for Lee, and you still have 3,4 M extra to sign some good players. This makes totally sense for the Yankees. This also makes sense for the Mariners, because Felix is a lot more useful to the Yankees than to the Mariners, as the M’s are rebuilding, and the Yankees are reloading. So if the Yankees offer a sweet deal, the M’s should take it.
brian_sun - December 14, 2010
Dumping bad contracts is not needed for the Mariners since they are rebuilding.
Milton’s salary is gone after 2011 regardless. Trading Felix to help clear up salary room in 2010 would be preposterously stupid.
Matthew - December 14, 2010
*salary room for 2011
Matthew - December 14, 2010
Considering I see the Phillies play 10-15 times in a typical summer...
this is definitely a positive conclusion to the Lee situation.
flashbeak - December 14, 2010
Some twitterific thoughts from C.J. Wilson
Holy crap how big is the phillies’ payroll going to be? glad if we didn’t get him he at least switched leagues
Carlos ruiz is now the luckiest catcher in baseball- for at least 4 out of 5 days he won’t have to think hard for 7-9 innings
Ironically- we play philly this year in interleague play…not sure which guy I’d rather bat against but it will be an awesome series
msb - December 14, 2010
My guess is that David Montgomery is embezzling money from the University of Pennslyvannia
If I were Cliff Lee I would get that contract insured just in case the Phillies default in future a la Tom Hicks. I also wouldn’t be sending any of my children to U Penn.
Trenchtown - December 14, 2010
Something that would be even more entertaining ...
Zack Greinke getting traded to the Mets and flourishing in NY
msb - December 14, 2010
It's kind of sad that this has been the most exciting day of the offseason for me as a M's fan.
waldo rojas - December 14, 2010
Looking at the terms of the contract for the first time this morning and seeing that Lee took one less year makes me think...
It’s a gamble, but like any gamble, there’s a real chance that it could pay off for Lee and he could make more money in the long term. He seems like the type of pitcher that could effectively pitch until the big 4-0.
Kenneth Arthur - December 14, 2010
If Joe Blanton were on the Rangers
he and Tommy Hunter would have some great hot dog eating contests. Unless Tommy Hunter is a vegetarian, which would totally fit with his ‘300 pound world karate prodigy pitch-to-contact’ character that he is
tsunamijesus - December 14, 2010
Because they are both fat fatties!
abender20 - December 14, 2010
The Phillies added a C to their H2O rotation
That’s sweet!
!
gregorykohler - December 14, 2010
Talk about building team chemistry.
thehemogoblin - December 14, 2010
The only thing that would have been better would be Lee coming back here
And that obviously was never possible. Lee going to the Yankees would have sucked, Lee going back to the Rangers would have been devastating. Going back to the NL is just perfect, though, it really is. Much like Jeff, I’ve largely gotten over “hate-‘em-cuz-they’re-the-Yankees” (I definitely preferred them in last year’s ALCS) but bad news for fans of either and both of these teams fills me with schadenfreude :)
Aly Edge - December 14, 2010
It's cool to see an awesome rotation like that when its in the National League - so yeah, I'll be looking forward to the Phillies 2011 season.
Kenneth Arthur - December 14, 2010
I love that they get to eat some crow
During the first two rounds of the playoffs, a guy I follow on twitter was constantly talking about how Lee was a foregone conclusion. At one point he said “Cliff Lee is going to look great in Yankee pinstripes next year”
His response last night: “If this bullshit is true, we’re going to spit all the fuck over his wife next time. She ain’t seen nothing yet.”
Payback’s a bitch.
surfmonkey89 - December 14, 2010
The Phillies rock.
The plan must have always been to go back to Philly, after he helped them by taking a leave of absence so the Phillies could get Halladay.
That’s a great organization and Gillick left a great legacy.
May I ask what exactly is wrong with Micheal Young? He kills us. Is it because he only scored 99 and not 100 runs? Or the fact he only had 186 hits, 91 rbi, and 21 homers? I am missing why someone has to be dumb to have him on their team. I am perplexed. He’s a lifetime 300 hitter. I’m not trying to be a dick (although I play one on TV), but this simply must be discussed.
cjhenry41 - December 14, 2010
What's wrong with Micheal Young is that he's just an averageish hitter, is declining, is a terrible defender, and is signed to a hilariously bad contract.
Goose - December 14, 2010
Because RBIs and runs don't matter, batting average isn't tell-all stat, his home ballpark is the moon, and he is a terrible defensive player with a bad contract?
these all sound like they combine to make a bad player
seattlebruin - December 15, 2010
Wait, he plays on the moon?
Kirk - December 15, 2010
It doesn't inflate stats that much.
After all, you have to crab circle around the bases.
JY - December 15, 2010
It's so easy to crab circle when you hit the ball with escape velocity
seattlebruin - December 16, 2010
Rangers Ballpark in Orbit
ThundaPC - December 15, 2010
No no no he plays IN the moon
seattlebruin - December 16, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.