Note: If this isn't particularly coherent or intelligent, please lay your blame squarely on Jeff's shoulders for stealing my brilliant idea for tonight's post.
A little over a year ago, David Aardsma was acquired from the Boston Red Sox for middling minor league starter Fabian Williamson. Nothing earth-shaking in a mediocre reliever being traded for roster filler, but you all know the story: Brandon Morrow's command imploded and Aardsma ended up being our closer for most of the season, doing a pretty good job (I am spoiled after J.J.), especially considering both his cost and the low expectations laid on him. Now he's expected to anchor our bullpen again. What might we expect from him?
David Aardsma ran a tRA+ of 120 last season, so it's not like much of his 175 ERA+ wasn't helped by the defence. However, it was a genuine improvement over his career results: the bulk of his work prior to 2009 had him as a slightly-below-average relief pitcher. What changed? Is it sustainable, or did Aardsma fluke his way into a good season last year to set us up for some hilarious Morrowing in the future?
We see an uptick in strikeouts and a slight decrease in walks, which along with a raised swinging strike percentage shows that he did genuinely pitch better in 2009. However, the most notable difference in his component stats between last year and the previous ones is his HR/FB rate, which dropped to 40% of his career rate. Check it out:

Figure 1: David Aardsma HR/FB rate, 2005-2009.
Since preventing home runs on balls hit in the air doesn't turn out to have much to do with pitcher skill, it would be pretty understandable to be skeptical of Aardsma's ability to continue being a good closer in 2010. If that HR/FB rate want back up to his career norms, he goes back to being an adequate reliever rather than a guy you want on the mound in high leverage situations. However, I suspect it will not - and furthermore, I suspect the Mariners knew that his HR/FB would fall beyond what one might normally expect from the effect of Safeco Field.
Here's why:
As you all know, Safeco represses right-handed power significantly while giving left-handed bats a bit of a boost. Normally, this effect serves to benefit the Jarrod Washburns of the world, who can get lefties out just fine but are mauled by righthanders. One wouldn't expect a rightie closer to be particularly helped out here, especially since higher-leverage relievers see more elite opposite handed batters than usual. But there's a pretty important twist here.
Aardsma is only an extreme fly-ball pitcher against right-handed batters. For his career, he's running a GB rate of 40.2% against lefties vs. 31.2%(!) for right handers. Furthermore, his HR/FB rate has been much higher over his career against right-handed hitters. With this in mind, it shouldn't come as any surprise that his rate of giving up home runs plummeted upon arrival in Seattle - and I have to imagine that the Mariners knew this when they acquired him. If you wanted to doubt him based on his fluky-looking numbers last year, I'd give those numbers a little bit of a closer look. It's unlikely that he limits home runs to quite the extent that he managed in 2009, but expecting him to regress to his career numbers or to league average seems like it'd be more than a little unfair.
2 recs | 37 comments
Does this mean
The soiler of pants gets the chance to rack up saves if worst comes to worst?
Opisgod - February 12, 2010
League should be first in line for the closer role, yes
But I don’t see how this post ‘means’ that.
Graham MacAree - February 12, 2010
No, it doesn't 'mean' that...
but I think it helps explain the Morrow trade that so many people disliked. League is the closer in waiting…and for one, I’m very glad he’s here.
diderot - February 13, 2010
I still can't quite believe Aardsma's 2009 happened.
I’m glad our front office is much smarter than me.
(By the way, I think you’re missing a qualifier here: ‘Aardsma is only an extremely pitcher against right-handed batters.’
‘Fly ball’ I’d guess’.)
marc w - February 12, 2010
This is what happens when you decide edit sentences then do something else in the middle of it!
Graham MacAree - February 12, 2010
"Since preventing home runs on balls hit in the air doesn't turn out to have much to do with pitcher skill"
I think this statement holds fairly well for SP but I’m not sure I believe it for really good RP.
The above mentioned JJ Putz (who is a right hander) gave up 7, 9, and 8% HR/FB when he was the amazing Mariners pitcher we will never forget.
I think there is something we are missing when we try to evaluate RP because I don’t think we really know how to project RP home runs. I’m not sure what/why it is but I think there is something that really good relief pitchers do that limit home runs. That makes it hard for me to conclude whether Aardsma got lucky or became a better relief pitcher who could control his home run rate.
Edgar for Pres - February 12, 2010
The league average rate of HR/FB is known to be lower for relievers than starters
They still don’t seem to show much ability to control it, or at least they didn’t when I checked yty correlation on HR/FB rate back int he day.
Graham MacAree - February 12, 2010
I don't know about that
Franciso Cordero, Jonathan Papelbon and Mariano Rivera have limited HR/FB rates pretty definitively over their careers. I don’t think its a widespread ability but it really does look to me that there appear to be a handful of RP that can limit their home run rates.
Edgar for Pres - February 12, 2010
Mo Rivera is a freak of nature never to be repeated.
hcoguy - February 13, 2010
Do you remember the r or r-squared values of your yty correlation?
baetown415 - February 12, 2010
Yeah after looking at it more, the range of HR allowed by RP was 0 to 13
It will definitely be difficult to tell if some pitchers have control over a noisy variable because the yearly sample size is so small. I’m basically arguing that a RP can reduce his total # of HR by one or two a year which might happen but at such a small level like this, we will probably never be able to prove for sure. I still feel like some RP might be able to limit HR/FB but i’m getting the feeling that small samples have also been tricking me so I probably won’t push this too much more.
Edgar for Pres - February 13, 2010
Would that suggest that HR/FB increases as total pitches in a game increases?
Or is the difference just not that large?
Two Rs and Two Ls - February 13, 2010
Neato
Poochie - February 12, 2010
Besides the higher GB rate vs. LHH,
Aardsma keeps lefties in the yard because lefties have a helluva time pulling the ball against him. By my tallies, Aardsma only allowed 6 fly balls to the right fielder all season against lefties. Of all his air outs against lefties, only about 16% made it to the right fielder. The only home run he gave up to a lefty was to Jack Cust, and that went out to left field. (I could have missed a few which would throw the numbers off a bit, but point remains.)
JonBBT - February 12, 2010
I'm gonna be honest...I'm consistently terrifed when DA is closing.
Too many of those FBs are well hit for my liking.
SethGrandpa - February 12, 2010
I believe that HR/FB supression on flyballs to the outfield is not a skill
But you can suppress the rate if you induce a lot of popouts. Jered Weaver, Bronson Arroyo and Johan Santana all have a ton of infield flies each year and they consistently have lower HR rates.
the League average IFFB% is about 9%, and Aardsma was at 8.3% last year, so it doesn’t look sustainable.
Opisgod - February 12, 2010
So you think that flyballs that would have been going for home runs instead become popups?
Edgar for Pres - February 12, 2010
Except you're totally ignoring park effects which was rather the point of the post
Graham MacAree - February 13, 2010
Popups are basically automatic outs
And have no chance of becoming home runs, but they are also counted with the FB% and HR/FB stats. If there is little a pitcher can do about flyballs heading to the outfield, then having a high IFFB% would give the ‘illusion’ that they can suppress home runs. That’s what I should have said.
Opisgod - February 12, 2010
Yeah you might be right.
Edgar for Pres - February 12, 2010
I looked at last year's data
Neither RP or SP show any sort of relationship between IFFB% and HR/FB. R^2 ~ 0.01 I’ll try to put more up about this.
Edgar for Pres - February 13, 2010
Everything else gives basically an R^2 ~ 0
so everything is also equally as bad probably
Edgar for Pres - February 13, 2010
Naturally
Because these things take more than a year to normalize, but pitchers who consistently induce a lot of popups over multiple seasons will have lower HR/FB rates on an average of 2-3% better than the regressed norm. Aardsma definitely has the approach to control a small part of his suppression, by always pitching in the away part of the zone he takes away a good part of most left-hander’s power abilities, but even these will start to get pulled eventually.
Opisgod - February 13, 2010
Do you have evidence of this? I didn't see any.
Edgar for Pres - February 13, 2010
Career leaders:
Lowest IFFB%, and HR/FB%
1. Brandon Webb: 6.6%, 13.2%
2. Derek Lowe: 7.4%, 12.7%
3. Greg Maddux: 7.7%, 12%
4. Jason Marquis: 7.7%, 11.8%
5. Aaron Cook: 7.7%, 10.2%
Highest IFFB%, and HR/FB%
1. Tim Wakefield: 15.1%, 9.4%
2. Bronson Arroyo: 13.8%, 9.7%
3. Randy Wolf: 13.7%, 10.6%
4. Barry Zito: 13.6%, 8.6%
5. Ted Lilly: 13.5%, 10.9%
Johan Santana: 13.3%, 9.5%
Opisgod - February 14, 2010
If you look at the rest of the population I bet you basically don't see any trend
And even the trend shown is super tiny. Basically the top five have HR/FB ~ 12% and the bottom five have HR/FB ~ 10%. That is the maximum difference seen and we don’t even know if IFFB% is the relevant variable. The top five pitchers have higher GB rates (was not relevant in correlation tests so probably doesn’t matter too much) and are basically completely different types of pitchers.
Edgar for Pres - February 14, 2010
This might be the best picture I have of Aardsma and I find it very fitting.
mark sobba - February 12, 2010
A lot of Mike Schooler's saves used to look like that too.
I always wondered how Schooler/Aardsma never got whiplash.
MarioMangler - February 13, 2010
Appreciate you not including Rob Johnson's face on the graph
Griffin Cooper - February 13, 2010
Catcher ERA
thehemogoblin - February 13, 2010
I actually quite enjoyed cutting off his head
Graham MacAree - February 13, 2010
If that's the case...
I can suggest a few Photoshop filters and adjustments that would be very entertaining.
Sidi - February 14, 2010
If that improves his ability to catch the ball, then he'd likely be in your debt.
Kermit. - February 14, 2010
This site is ridiculous
so much great analysis and relevant information… easily the deepest SBN blog I’ve peeked at!
SoundPound - February 14, 2010
It is pretty beastly, isn't it?
nathaniel dawson - February 14, 2010
And the season hasn't even started yet.
ThundaPC - February 14, 2010
Unfortunately, Aardsma can't be sure of only pitching at Safeco
He gets about half his games there (assuming home games reach the 9th in a “save” state at roughly the same rate as away games, though obviously that’s affected by the difference in which team bats last) and a bunch in McAfee which is almost as favorable for his purposes. And most of the fields that are as favorable to RH hitters as Safeco is unfavorable are in the NL, fortunately. But maybe Wak should find Aardsma “unavailable” and go with League when facing a save opportunity in Camden, Tropicana, or US Cellular.
Also, there’s a lot of “expectation” in the last line of the intro para.
wandergeist - February 18, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.