SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

Joel Pineiro Seems Fine

The Angels' pitching staff has a number of question marks. Scott Kazmir isn't what he once was. Ervin Santana appears to be as distant from 2008 as the Mariners. Joe Saunders is thoroughly hittable. The depth isn't real good. But while the team can't be real thrilled with how its arms have looked to date, early returns on the Joel Pineiro gamble are nothing but positive.

Things were looking good in Mach, when Pineiro induced 42 groundouts while recording just 13 outs in the air. But that's spring training. The real test comes during the regular season, and, well, what has Pineiro done in the regular season?

Through two games, against real solid New York and Minnesota lineups, Pineiro has allowed 40 balls in play. 27 of them have been grounders. For good measure, he's also struck out nine of 52 batters and generated a bunch of swinging strikes. And I should mention that he's done this against a million lefties. A year ago, lefties made up 49% of Pineiro's plate appearances. Through two games in 2010, lefties have made up 73% of Pineiro's plate appearances (38/52).

Joel Pineiro has looked good. Real good. And lest you wonder about his actual sinker, as opposed to the results his sinker has generated over a small number of games, the PITCHfx info has his sinker moving every bit as much as it did in St. Louis. The uniform is different, but the repertoire, it appears, is the same.

I wouldn't count on Pineiro continuing to miss bats. His strikeout rate a year ago was among the lowest in baseball, against inferior competition. That's probably a fluke, much like Doug Fister's early rate last summer. But the balls in play? No reason to think that's an anomaly. Pineiro is continuing what made him successful in 2009, and that's good news for a rival, and bad news for us.

0 recs  |  33 comments

Comments

Plus Jo-el will be like all motivated and shit when he pitches against us
At least their bullpen looks crappy
I was going to post something intelligent.

Instead, all I have is:
The steroid steroids they have in Southern steriodfornia must steroid better than the what Steroid was able to get at his old steriod.
Ok. I’m a little bitter.

God dammit I wanted him so bad.
He would have sucked if we signed him.
Yeah that start in the Bronx was amazing

I’m officially worried about him.

I'm not gonna let Joel Pineiro trick me again

I stood up for him in 2006 and thought he was gonna turn it around but instead he sucked like he had never sucked before. If I start thinking he is good, he’s just gonna start being shitty again to stick it to me. Why couldn’t you be good in 2005 or 2006.

So, could you please start to think he is good again?
Maybe when we play him.
The reinvention appears to be a success.

From what little I’ve seen from him last year, plus today’s start, I’ve gotten the impression that he’s not too fancy but he gets the job done. Good for Pineiro.

WHY DON'T THEYEVER LISTEN TO ME
None of these taken out of context!
Trade Idea
Jose Lopez for Anthony Reyes

Link

Felix is a bad influence
trade him for Francisco Liriano.

Link

We might as well trade Jones for Kei Igawa now.

Link

Bedarad is the only player available
that I’d consider trading Jones for.

Link

Well I guess they listened to you on that last one.

Those all seem to be comments by me
If Bedard comes back and is good,

I nominate Bedarad as the new nickname

Yes, just what the doctor ordered to beat the home run hitting Yankees.

An effective extreme groundball inducing pitcher and it worked. Pineiro kept them off balance all day. Watching the Mariners game last night, it appears Mr. Fister is fine as well.

Fister isn't nearly as good as Pineiro 2.0 or whatever update version he is right now, but he's a nice "little" 4 or 5 starter. He just doesn't get as many groundballs and is much more vulnerable to the HR.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.