Blog: Lone Star Ball
Players listed are based on my best efforts to gather information and are not guaranteed to be correct
Position Players
C: Jarrod Saltalamacchia
1B: Chris Davis
2B: Ian Kinsler
SS: Elvis Andrus
3B: Michael Young
LF: Josh Hamilton
CF: Julio Borbon
RF: Nelson Cruz
DH: Vladimir Guerrero
Bench-C: Taylor Teagarden
Bench-IF: Andres Blanco
Bench-1B/DH: Ryan Garko
Bench-OF: David Murphy
Depth:
C: Matt Treanor, Max Ramirez
1B: Justin Smoak, Max Ramirez
2B: Gregorio Petit
SS: Gregorio Petit
3B: Gregorio Petit, Matt Brown
OF: Brandon Boggs, Craig Gentry, Endy Chavez
Going straight off the name value, it's easy to look at this lineup and think "just another slugging batting order in Texas." Vlad, Hamilton, Cruz, Davis, Kinsler, and Young? This lineup's never going to relent!
Name value, though, is a dangerous means of estimation, as it may very often steer you wrong. Offensively speaking, this is a good lineup, but not a great one, and while there's obvious upside, it's more about volatility - this order has a wide range of potential outcomes.
Vladimir Guerrero is 35 and had the worst season of his career in 2009. The Rangers are counting on a bounceback, and it's the perfect environment for him (as it's the perfect environment for anyone), but how much better can they realistically expect him to be? His peak is almost certainly gone. Josh Hamilton is arguably the most physically talented player in the division, but he's also deathly fragile and struggled to produce between injuries. Chris Davis, for all of his power and success in the minors, was impossibly bad over 400 PAs. Young's due to regress. Saltalamacchia hasn't shown he can produce. On and on.
I'm not going to do a player-by-player analysis, because that would take too long, and I'm not a Rangers fan. The point is that, for all of its talent, this is a lineup littered with question marks. On top of everything else, Ian Kinsler's going to begin the year on the DL with a high ankle sprain, and while that's not a major injury, it's the sort that fans of other sports know can linger. It's not a...comfortable lineup. I'd be comfortable with the talent, but I wouldn't be comfortable with the probability that enough players can show off their talent at once.
Working in Texas' benefit is that they do have some reasonable depth. Murphy's a league-average bat ready to step in if Hamilton gets hurt, the dropoff from Saltalamacchia to Teagarden isn't huge, and between Garko, Smoak, and Ramirez, they should be able to find at least one sufficiently potent bat at 1B/DH. It's the infield that's the problem, because Blanco and Petit are terrible. At least at the plate. This team really needs Kinsler and Andrus to stay as healthy as possible, because the guys behind them spell trouble.
Julio Borbon's going to be annoying, by the way. Makes a lot of contact, puts the ball on the ground, runs like he's wearing afterburner roller skates. If I didn't know better, I'd think he played for us.
As for the defense? The big plus, obviously, is Andrus. Cruz has always scored well, even if he doesn't look like it. I'm guessing Borbon is pretty good. Nobody else is particularly special - although Blanco has earned rave reviews - so overall, this unit should probably be a little above average. Andrus makes the rest of the infield look like a bunch of damn retards, but Young could be a little better after a year of adjusting to third.
Starters
SP: Rich Harden
SP: C.J. Wilson
SP: Scott Feldman
SP: Colby Lewis
SP: Matt Harrison
Depth:
Tommy Hunter
Brandon McCarthy
Derek Holland
Martin Perez?
The Rangers might have too much pitching. I know, it weirds me out too. You could make an argument that every single one of those guys is at least about average, and they have enough depth in the system to absorb some degree of injury or underperformance.
Everybody knows what Harden brings to the table - punchout stuff, walks, injury concerns, short starts. He's not a traditional ace, but he's the most talented starter the Rangers have had in a good long time, so there's a lot riding on his shoulders. Behind him, there is quality and a handful of question marks. Feldman and Harrison are known entities, although Harrison comes with some upside as he claims he can throw a little harder after surgery. Wilson and Lewis will be keys. Wilson hasn't started since 2005, but he dominates lefties and added a cutter towards the end of 2009 to help him against righties. And while former top prospect Lewis got throttled in the bigs, he spent the last two years in Japan, piling up 369 strikeouts and 46 walks in 354.1 innings. If any part of that is in any way representative of a new, improved Colby Lewis, he could be the find of the winter.
Behind those five guys are another few quality arms. Hunter was supposed to begin the year in the rotation before straining his oblique, and when he's healthy, he's carried by his disproportionate success against righties. McCarthy has a new two-seamer, cutter, and delivery which have shown promise, and he took a step up in 2009. Holland has strikeout stuff, fanning 94 in 117 innings as a starter, and he could easily emerge as the team's second-best starter by July. And Martin Perez is only one of the top pitching prospects in baseball.
This is a good group of starters. There are concerns, of course, and it isn't impossible to imagine a scenario in which Harden gets hurt, Lewis struggles, and Wilson can't cut it, but even then, you can replace those three guys with the next three in line and not really suffer a whole lot. This rotation is deep, and anyone who thinks it all rests on Harden's health is incorrect.
Relievers
RP: Frank Francisco
RP: Darren Oliver
RP: Neftali Feliz
RP: Chris Ray
RP: Darren O'Day
RP: Dustin Nippert
RP: Doug Mathis
Depth:
Warner Madrigal
Guillermo Moscoso
Kasey Kiker
Eric Hurley
The most important part of a bullpen is the top, and the Rangers aren't looking too bad - Francisco's a strikeout machine, Feliz as a reliever has otherworldly stuff, and the ageless Oliver is better than you think he is. O'Day's a useful pitcher, too, curiously platoon-free and flyball-neutral for a sidearming sinkerballer, and while I don't know a whole lot about the rest of the group, the back of the bullpen is of lesser significance, and tends to change makeup throughout the season anyway. All of those depth names have demonstrated some pretty good strikeout ability, although Hurley is currently rehabbing from a couple surgeries and Madrigal is dealing with unexplained forearm tightness.
It's a bullpen. It's talented. Bullpens are hard to predict. The biggest questions are in middle relief, but the biggest questions are almost always in middle relief.
Overall
There's talent almost everywhere, and it's easy to see why so many people think this team is on the verge of really arriving. I don't know that the Rangers are necessarily better than the Angels or Mariners in terms of WAR projections, but they clearly have the most upside, meaning I think this is the team most likely to run away with the division. Along with that upside, though, comes the downward volatility, so we shouldn't get too far ahead of ourselves in proclaiming Texas the favorites. Still, while they will need their luck and their health, this team is inarguably positioned well to make a run at the playoffs.
Why You Should Root For Them If The Mariners Drop Out
Talent. It's hard to root against talent. Obvious, in-your-face talent. The Rangers, as an organization, are run really well, and they're loaded with capable players. If the Angels win the division, it'll be annoying. If the A's win the division, it'll be annoying. If the Rangers win the division, it'll make sense. Guys like Andrus and Feliz and Harden are just treats to watch, and I'd be happy to watch this team bring down one of the beasts from the East.
Why You Should Root Against Them If The Mariners Drop Out
I dunno. Jealousy? General displeasure that comes with having a rival whoop your ass? They've never won a playoff series, and that'd be a funny thing to keep alive, I guess. Wouldn't look forward to all the mass media love going in Michael Young's direction.
1 recs | 45 comments
Lenny Ignelzi is all over the place!
Teej - April 2, 2010
Roto depth
Michael Kirkman is ahead of Perez. Bullpen depth: Watch out for Alexi Ogando, Tanner Scheppers and Omar Beltre in the bullpen . Especially Ogando, he has Feliz like stuff. Mitch Moreland is probably ahead of Ramirez at 1B/DH and ahead of Boggs if Cruz does down.
Kinslerhomer - April 2, 2010
Cool, thanks
Jeff Sullivan - April 2, 2010
If the Rangers have to go down to their 9th SP
then it will be a long season in Arlington. No need bringing up Perez for nothing.
RangerMad - April 2, 2010
On the other hand, when your rotation has Harden, two converted relievers, a guy from Japan and a youngster who's never thrown more than 166 innings
then maybe the depth is relevant. It’s pretty easy to imagine a scenario where Lewis sucks, Wilson or Harrison can’t handle the work load, and Harden is on the 15-day with a sore something. Suddenly, those guys count. But don’t take this as a knock on your rotation, it’s deep and the backups are very talented. They are mostly young and unpolished, but the upside’s pretty great.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 2, 2010
*youngster who's never thrown more that 116 innings
shit.
Bearskin Rugburn - April 2, 2010
I suck
Bearskin Rugburn - April 2, 2010
Andrus has a very calm Turning-Two Face
lemonverbena - April 2, 2010
C.J. Wilson has this face
Teej - April 2, 2010
No way
This can’t be something that is real, it just can’t.
OlSalty - April 2, 2010
I believe this is what is known as a "grimace".
I want him to be a Mariner now.
Johnny Slick - April 2, 2010
No, No. This is a grimace
InSpokane - April 2, 2010
CJ is twitterific.
msb - April 2, 2010
I still think he has all the makings of a pirate from the old black and white pirate films of the30's, 40's and 50's
laxtonto - April 2, 2010
Never won a playoff series?
I did not know that. Being a Rangers fan must be a tough gig.
sanford_and_son - April 2, 2010
Yup.
Fortunately, there hasn’t been a whole lot of atrocious years, but that kind of means we don’t even get the notoriety that comes from being laughing stocks. It’s pretty much like we’ve never existed.
philkid3 - April 2, 2010
and the fact that the Marlins and Diamondbacks have won titles makes it sting a little more.
yet again, they beat the Yankees both times, so it’s not so bad.
chrisR - April 3, 2010
and the Rays and Rockies have both made it to the World Series
NothinG - April 4, 2010
I really wish Andrus played in another division, because I love watching him play.
Sadly now I have to root for him to turn into Yuniesky.
Sec 108 - April 2, 2010
You get more chances to watch him play because he's in our division!
lailaihei - April 2, 2010
IF depth
Do they still have Arias and German? They’re clearly better hitters than Petit/Blanco – guess they’re worried that Arias/German can’t play SS. That’s still a half-decent foursome for back-up 2b/SS guys. I’d rather have German than Woodward/Wilson any day.
marc w - April 2, 2010
Arias is out of options
Blanco, too, so when Kinsler comes back, one of them is gone. German’s on a minor league contract, but it seems like he didn’t impress anyone in camp, hence Blanco.
Jeff Sullivan - April 2, 2010
I shouldn't say "gone"
They could easily slip through waivers. So, yes, Arias and German are both currently still in the organization.
Jeff Sullivan - April 2, 2010
I don't think Arias is a clearly better hitter than Blanco.
philkid3 - April 2, 2010
That's fair. More German than Arias.
I’m also forgetting that Blanco’s getting better, because hoo boy, the man put up some Bocockian years in the low-minors.
marc w - April 2, 2010
German has looked pretty horrible in ST.
-He’s decent at the plate, but good for about an error per game at SS.
-Blanco is very good defensively and has an adequate bat for a UIF.
-Arias has looked slightly better than German defensively (still not good) and worse than Blanco hitting.
Blanco almost wins the job on defense alone because the other two have been so bad.
e2drummer - April 2, 2010
good assessment Jeff
The weakness in the Rangers org is their infield depth. Any extended DL trips by Andrus or Kinsler would hurt. However, they do have the currency to go out and get someone if needed.
RangerMad - April 2, 2010
Awesome piece Jeff
I always love to come here and read some of your write-ups. Best of luck to the Mariners in 2010. Here’s to dethroning the Angels and making Rev cry!
jdh90 - April 2, 2010
Is there any truth to the rumor that Josh Hamilton's toothache was a consequence of meth mouth?
abender20 - April 2, 2010
Here we go!
royalcurve - April 2, 2010
Area man wonders if there is any truth to the rumor that Josh Hamilton's toothache was a
consequence of meth mouth.
Twitter confirms.
Sec 108 - April 2, 2010
If we drop out there is no way I'll root for the Rangers
Misery loves company.
OceanBird - April 2, 2010
I'm willing to root for the Rangers
But the ALCS is about as far as I can go.
ThundaPC - April 2, 2010
That was the Angels in '02 for me, so I know where y'all are coming from.
I didn’t hate the Angels yet then, I just wanted them to beat the Yankees. After that, I just couldn’t stand the thought of a non-A’s team from the West finally winning a title if the Rangers couldn’t.
philkid3 - April 2, 2010
Hell, the Rangers couldn't even win a postseason GAME back in the day.
Two Rs and Two Ls - April 2, 2010
One. Single. Win.
When the Rays beat the White Sox a second time in 2008, we were officially the least-winning active post-season franchise.
philkid3 - April 2, 2010
Eh
we weren’t the only squad to get bulldozed by those great Yankee teams.
FirebatM3 - April 2, 2010
That's what tends to happen when your best teams are in the late 90's
facing off the Yankees in the ALDS.
craig3410 - April 2, 2010
Good stuff.
I find myself oddly liking the Rangers.
I don’t like liking a division rival. But like you say, they have a lot of fun players.
I really can’t wait to see Holland back in the big leagues
JonBBT - April 2, 2010
Nice job Jeff
LSJ - April 2, 2010
A very fair assessment of the Rangers.
I’m not completely sold on the bats either, but there’s definite potential.
e2drummer - April 2, 2010
Seems oddly optimistic
Given all of the (accurately) listed potential problems, seems weird that you would conclude good things. Question specifically for Jeff – you think the Rangers have a better shot at the AL West title than the Mariners?
ab03 - April 3, 2010
Yes, slightly
Jeff Sullivan - April 3, 2010
Visiting from LSB
I think this is a good assessment, overall, but you could be underrating the defense.
The catchers are passable but nothing great. They are by far the worst defenders the Rangers have. Well, unless you don’t think Mike Young is getting better at 3rd. I think he seems to be.
At first base, Chris Davis is amazing. At second, Kinsler is a little error prone but has good range and is athletic. I guess you know about Andrus. The OF is very good overall. Hamilton in left field should be way above average, I think. Well as long as he stays healthy. Cruz is indeed better than many think. Borbon is the weak link out there, actually, but it is said that he’s improved a great deal. Still doesn’t have much of an arm. In any case if he’s improved his routes at all then he’s going to be above average simply because of his speed.
So even though you have Mike Young out there and a substandard duo of catchers, none of them are butchers. I can’t say there’s a glaring weakness in the field.
I agree with your assessment about the starting pitching and bullpen. There’s enough talent in the organization to cover just about any contingency. I’m not as sold on Holland being good at this point in his career, though, and even though you’re not alone I wonder what makes people think that he can be the Rangers’ best or second-best SP in 2010.
Anyway, lots of upside. The problem will be scoring runs, just as it was last year.
Black Francis - April 3, 2010
Very good assessment, Jeff
chrisR - April 3, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.