Greg Fiume - Getty Images
This image captures the entire spectrum of feelings O's fans have for their team right now.
Some games are important to win because they improve your team's chances of winning a championship. Some games are important to win because they set or approach some kind of record or involve a notable personal achievement. And some games are important to win because you're tired of hearing about somebody's nap.
The sooner the team starts playing good baseball, the sooner we can put this whole story and its completely disproportionate reaction behind us. There's plenty of actual significance to talk about. Let's talk about it.
I hate a weak chin. Josh Wilson has a weak chin. Ewww
0 recs | 158 comments
Texas lost as well.
Always nice to gain some ground.
ChaseB - May 11, 2010
And the Angels are losing 6-0 to the Rays in the seventh.
Huzzah.
JY - May 11, 2010
Well they were playing the A's, so we were gonna make up ground on someone either say.
Anyway, the Angels should lose, so even more ground! I like ground.
RunningFool - May 11, 2010
Not to attack you, but just as a pre-emptive strike:
This is not an open thread, and if you’d like a prolonged discussion on other games, please go to the game thread. Thanks!
Jeff Sullivan - May 11, 2010
I was just adding to why the game was important.
I understand though, won’t happen again.
ChaseB - May 11, 2010
No, you're fine
I just wanted to stop the subthread before it grew.
Jeff Sullivan - May 11, 2010
I wonder if anyone has gone deer-hunting with a tee, a bat and a bucket of baseballs.
That would be the baddest of ass.
RunningFool - May 11, 2010
Or just: fungo-hunting.
ignacio - May 11, 2010
Tiger woods taught him that while they were out hunting for cougars together
Trenchtown - May 11, 2010
If Jose Lopez were hitting like his usual league-average self, he'd be one of the best players in baseball so far.
That’s a hilarious thought, but I’m not convinced that it is of any consequence since Lopez is trolling us by finding new ways to be a league average player. Next year he’ll hit like Pujols and field like drunken Adam Dunn.
abender20 - May 11, 2010
Actually he'd still be less valuable than Guti.
Learn to hit, Choloafie.
abender20 - May 11, 2010
Josh Wilson is six feet tall?
Huh.
groovewrangler - May 11, 2010
Josh Wilson is a perfectly average human being
Corco - May 11, 2010
I wouldn't say that 6 feet is average.
Maybe for a baseball player, but not for an American male. Learn facts, Corco.
Coach Owens - May 12, 2010
Well look whose balls dropped
Bearskin Rugburn - May 12, 2010
About 5'10", actually.
harkening - May 12, 2010
I doubt it
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
We've all said this before, but Cliff Lee is really awesome.
Totally agree that he’s a joy to watch.
Fearless Frog - May 11, 2010
Just please keep the "new guys", Langerhans, Wilson, and Saunders, in the line-up
If not for them, it really could have been one of those nights where the M’s could give no run support to good starting pitching again.
Ichiro did his job and had a double, and got on base 3 times out of 5, but he had no runs scored thanks to Figgins (except his sole add-on hit in the 9th), fucking Lopez, etc. the "regular" guys.
Without those new guys and Rob Johnson having an anomaly, it could easily have been one of those zero nights again.
If Kotchman and Jack Wilson just have to come back, they better find a way to rest Figgins and Lopie instead of getting rid of one of the new guys (Langerhans, Wilson, and Saunders).
Sam Regens - May 11, 2010
Saunders was drafted as a 3B/LHP...
Slurvey - May 11, 2010
Say wha?
Seriously?
harkening - May 11, 2010
Kind of
He throws right. But yes, 3B/RHP.
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
4 Aces!
JAH - May 11, 2010
What happens if Josh Wilson continues to play like this?
Where does Jack go? I mean, I doubt Josh keeps it up, being what, four or so games, but it’s a good problem to think about.
OceanBird - May 11, 2010
DH!
RunningFool - May 11, 2010
Err, Jo. Wilson to DH, Ja. Wilson to SS.
RunningFool - May 11, 2010
I agree vehemently
Jose Lopez's swing - May 11, 2010
I would guess they give Figgins some time off.
CapSea - May 11, 2010
He will not continue to play like this
Dewey N - May 12, 2010
Michael Saunders is going to lead us into the playoffs
Dewey N - May 11, 2010
Hasn't he already though?
Kermit. - May 11, 2010
Michael Saunders has led us to the playoffs?
Punkhazard - May 11, 2010
Fogel resides in the future, so the tense threw me off.
See, this is all in the past for him and he just likes to drop tantalizing bits of information now and then. But he’s also a notorious liar
Kermit. - May 11, 2010
I thought he lived in the past because of the MLB.tv lag?
Decatur - May 12, 2010
It was all a clever ruse
Dewey N - May 12, 2010
Enough with the talk about 1995
Dewey N - May 11, 2010
Who makes more sense to go once Bradley comes back—Griffey or Sweeney?
Bench would be Langerhans, Wilson, Sweeney/Griffey and Moore. Langerhans gives us a lefty with at least somewhat of a bat off the bench, but the guys most frequently pinch hit for are the righties. I could see a case for either being retained.
Fuckmikereilly - May 11, 2010
Colome.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
Realistically,
this team could cut Griffey, Sweeney, Colome and demote White and not miss any of them.
Those four should probably leave for Bradley, Hannahan, Bedard and Byrnes
Matthew - May 11, 2010
Isn't Byrnes gone?
Like, permanently?
harkening - May 11, 2010
I don't think he has a contract with his friend's softball team or anything
Matthew - May 11, 2010
Right, but he seemed pretty clear in stating he was hanging them up for good.
harkening - May 11, 2010
Yeah, I'm sure if the Mariners called him and said something about being too hasty
to cut him that he would just hang up the phone.
Matthew - May 11, 2010
Byrnes is working for CSN Bay Area
Saw him on the Giants postgame.
perfectstrat - May 12, 2010
This doesn't invalidate Matthew's point at all.
Mariner John - May 12, 2010
I would rather see the Mariners hire an actual, full-time clown to play fourth outfielder than Byrnes.
Decatur - May 12, 2010
Wait, because of Jeff's reaction, that would be totally awesome and worth support.
Decatur - May 12, 2010
Can't wait to hear the audio of Lee's postgame presser
Brock and Salk said Lee stopped and refused to continue until LaRue left the room.
Link
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
Kind of wish it was just dropped
and I don’t know that LaRue necessarily deserves that treatment as I doubt he just made that up.
At the same time, glad to see the show of solidarity from Lee.
Fuckmikereilly - May 11, 2010
From LaRue's blog, he's basically been blackballed by the players right now.
After they pestered him to give up names.
Another link.
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
Better than being blue balled by players I suppose.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
Getting cut off from Gutierrez love would be like going cold turkey from heroine/coke/meth all at once.
JAH - May 11, 2010
I'm more disappointed that Mike Sweeney decided to make a big scene
and make it impossible for the two players to settle this quietly with Griffey.
BrianL - May 11, 2010
I heard somewhere that he challenged the players to fight him.
Not sure if that’s true but if it is…wow.
Fearless Frog - May 11, 2010
Oh, just read that it is.
Way to go, hugger.
Fearless Frog - May 11, 2010
No way? Did he leave?
I don’t quite get the childish, 5th grade attitude of baseball players.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
They're kick turd of shit mountain until they graduate high school and then they're surrounded by people almost exactly like them for the rest of their careers.
It’s a recipe for arrested development.
Aaron Campeau - May 11, 2010
Perhaps a diversity class should be in order- maybe something like Wife Swap or The Real World where they don't have to hang out with manginas all day.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
Yeah, true.
I’ve always noticed that baseball players in highschool and college are the douchiest of all the athletes.
Hopefulmsfan - May 12, 2010
Lacrosse.
rbr07 - May 12, 2010
Of West Coast athletes, he's right.
Mariner John - May 12, 2010
I'm surprisingly torn on this.
I don’t think LaRue should suffer for writing what he did (unless he flat out made it up). However I respect a player’s point of view that he shouldn’t be under obligation to talk to a reporter if he doesn’t want to.
Conclusion: access to a post game press conference means jack diddly anyways.
Matthew - May 11, 2010
True, the presser itself isn't a big deal
Losing basically all access to players, however, hinders his job in a big way. Unless it dies down soon, which it probably will, it’s going to be a pain to write the way he wants to.
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
My guess is this blows over in a day or two.
I understand what they’re trying to do, but they’re not going to be able to permanently keep him away from press conferences.
Teej - May 11, 2010
It isn't the press conferences that matter
Being able to conduct interviews and grab quotes is the pain in this. But yeah, I don’t see this last more than a few days.
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
The players will be pissed for a while and LaRue might get the silent treatment,
but this appears to me to be more of a team-building exercise than a true stand against anyone. LaRue’s the only person whose name was on that article, so it’s natural that he’s going to take the brunt of it. They don’t like that he wrote it, but I don’t think anyone on the team truly believes he just made up quotes. They’re trying to preserve a fragile clubhouse. A few wins should bring things back to normal.
Please win, guys.
Teej - May 11, 2010
LaRue wouldn't be the first one of them to get the silent treatment
Jeff Sullivan - May 11, 2010
Note that I am speaking more in the abstract here.
This is dumb because LaRue has a press pass issued from the team. He’s allowed in the pool for the post game presser. Lee refusing to talk until LaRue leaves is beyond his objectionable rights as a Mariner employee.
Matthew - May 11, 2010
Yeah, I can't judge Cliff Lee for acting the way he did, even though I don't personally like it.
I’m just sad to see LaRue taking so much heat for reporting something that by all accounts has happened plenty of times in the past, even if it didn’t happen this particular time.
Jeff Nye - May 11, 2010
I don't agree with the bullying of reporters
But it’s also something that happens far too often in sports reporting and is almost part of the culture.
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
There is a reason this hasn't really been reported before
Jeff Sullivan - May 11, 2010
It's just hard to reconcile people acting like this is some huge secret that LaRue "outed", and thus justifying the shunning he's getting
When the reality seems to be that just about everybody covering the Mariners knows that this certainly wouldn’t be the first nap Griffey has taken “on the job”.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
Everybody knew it, but nobody really reported it
LaRue crossed a line, and regardless of whether he was justified in doing so, given the timing, the response was predictable, and one wonders about the benefit of reporting this in the first place.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
Right
I guess the guys with access see plenty of stuff that goes unreported. Reporters want more than a press pass, they want access to players’ off field lives. That’s what makes up the meat of an article. In exchange for letting their guard down in front of pressmen, players have to be able to trust them not to report on certain things.
LaRue broke that trust, and in doing so, writing his post in the tone that he did, he ensured that the Ms don’t release Griffey for a month at least. No way an organization as player-centric as this one releases him when everyone in the clubhouse is rallying around him.
Bearskin Rugburn - May 12, 2010
No offense, Jeff and Bearskin, but this kind of thinking drives me nuts.
This story is not about Griffey’s off-field life. Things like whether a player had an argument with his wife that morning or made some bad investments would be about a player’s off-field life, and while reporters certainly know about that stuff, there’s a reason you don’t see reporters reporting on it.
“Reporters want more than a press pass, they want access to players’ off field lives.”
LaRue reported on why Griffey wasn’t available to pitch-hit. Griffey napping during the game, in a situation that could have on-field impact, is directly in-bounds. Maybe the players thought LaRue crossed that line, but they’re wrong. If other reporters knew that Griffey had napped in the clubhouse during games (not before or after games), they abdicated their responsibility to report it.
“LaRue broke that trust, and in doing so, writing his post in the tone that he did, he ensured that the Ms don’t release Griffey for a month at least.”
… given the timing, the response was predictable, and one wonders about the benefit of reporting this in the first place.
It’s not LaRue’s responsibility to do anything that would make Griffey easier or harder for the organization to release. It’s not his responsibility to weigh the benefit for the team of reporting the story. His responsibility is not to the team or to make it look good or bad. It’s his responsibility to report the facts to the public, and that (as far as we know) is what he did.
Again, not coming down on you guys in particular – this is just a bit of a hot button for me.
Chris Hafner - May 12, 2010
I don't have a fundamental problem with LaRue's piece
I don’t think it is necessarily his job to report on the nap if it has always been standard practice for Griffey, and it sounds like it has if everyone knew it. Reporting on it now of all times, and writing with such certainty about imminent release, shifts the focus form real, on field issues to peripheral ones and I do have a problem with that although not a serious one.
By the way, when I say off-field I mean that very literally; it’s the things that happen behind the closed club house doors whether before during or after the game. These are the things we, as fans, don’t get to see, and some for good reason.
Bearskin Rugburn - May 12, 2010
Yeah, if the issue is *how* LaRue reported it instead of whether he crossed a line to report it, I completely agree.
For one thing, he effectively “buried the lede” by putting this (sure to spark interest) piece of information deep in his piece. For another, the whole point of his post was that Junior is sure to be released soon, an assertion that he makes with great certainty but without any sort of direct backup. And for another, the sleep portion of the story was backed up by unnamed sources, which is disappointing but I guess expected nowadays.
So no, I don’t think this is LaRue’s best piece. But the one specific thing I wanted to respond to here was whether LaRue was out of bounds in reporting this, and I don’t think he was. What’s most disappointing to me from the organization’s response is that they’re blaming the messenger rather than addressing the root problem that Griffey was napping during a game (probable) or that two players are lying about him (possible, I suppose, but unlikely). The two players and LaRue are just passing on the truth and being penalized for it.
Chris Hafner - May 12, 2010
It's certainly a very unusual situation
personally, I don’t really know on which side I come down. I see why LaRue reported what he did. I see how it’s a relevant bit of information. But I also see how it’s provocative without benefit, and if this is something Griffey’s been doing for a while – which it apparently is – why report it now, when you know damn well what the reaction’s going to be? What purpose does it serve? I’m all about getting Griffey off the team somehow, but I don’t think anybody wants him embroiled in controversy.
I guess it comes down to selectivity. LaRue could’ve told his story without including the nap. He has no responsibility to do so, of course, but is the extra traffic worth everything else?
I’m not sure.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
I feel like the nap was a throw-in with the story
Of course, he had to have known that the nap would become the story. If he was using it to draw in readers and get across his real point that Griffey is done, I understand. He still had to understand that his point would be lost when the nap story got picked up and ran with.
Brian Floyd - May 12, 2010
In terms of the purpose it serves, I think there is one in the context of the piece.
LaRue’s piece was about Griffey’s tenure with the team coming to an end, and this was one of the pieces of evidence he was using to illustrate that point because it seemingly shows a lack of commitment from both Griffey (napping) and Wakamatsu (didn’t know, or didn’t care enough to have him woken up). That paints a picture in which it’s not hard to imagine the two parties parting ways.
Like I said a few comments up, I’m not really enthralled with the way LaRue did it, but I’m not going to blame him for reporting this. Neither am I going to blame the two players – reading their quotes, it didn’t appear that they had any malicious intent (especially the second player), they were just perhaps naive in terms of how the public would view that.
Like you, I’m ready to have the whole thing go away because it’s annoying. Less so the initial story for me (I thought it was good for a chuckle) but because this ridiculous response to LaRue from the players and the witch hunt for the two players seems so misguided that it just makes me sad.
Chris Hafner - May 12, 2010
I get where they're coming from, though
This is something players don’t do, and it’s something sportwriters seldom write. It’s important for the team to stay together as a unit and to keep clubhouse matters in the clubhouse, and for that reason they need to make an example of this.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
I think we're actually more in agreement than it appears.
It makes sense to me that they’d use this as an opportunity to pull together and play the “us against the world” card. It’s a pretty savvy move for building clubhouse unity.
But while I understand it, I don’t like it at all. They’re punishing a guy for doing his job. They’re not blaming the appropriate party here – Griffey – and are instead blaming the people who are telling the truth about what he did. It’s fundamentally unjust.
To put it another way, the pragmatist in me understand it. The idealist in me thinks it’s amazingly unprofessional and it makes the players look like petulant children. All of me is tired of the drama and wishes Griffey would just go away.
Chris Hafner - May 12, 2010
Dammit. The pragmatist in me "understands it."
Chris Hafner - May 12, 2010
It may be unprofessional, but take it up with Wak or GMZ
Or the owners. It does not need to get to the media before them.
d0nkey - May 12, 2010
Yep
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
See, now we're banding together. We few, we happy few.
Mike Sweeney might actually have a plan. Or not.
Kermit. - May 11, 2010
Call me crazy, but I don't think it is very Christian to want to beat people up.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
Mike Sweeney, one man Crusade.
Kermit. - May 11, 2010
I think the bible is pretty much full of people beating people up
johnbai - May 12, 2010
Whoops, dammit
Just delete this comment. Can’t resist low hanging fruit.
johnbai - May 12, 2010
I see what you did there.
CapSea - May 12, 2010
Yeah, it's funny how a guy who is supposed to be this awesome saint-like figure
Has basically done something better suited to a sixth-grade playground.
Jeff Nye - May 11, 2010
You know that's too easy
Sweeney was acting in the best interests of the clubhouse. It’s his only purpose, and he serves it well.
Jeff Sullivan - May 11, 2010
Yes, I also think Sweeney is pretty awesome in this sense. (Off field management)
He would probably make a really good coach or manager after he retires.
Sam Regens - May 11, 2010
I'm not sure I agree that that's the effect, although I agree that was probably his intent.
At least two players aren’t rallying behind Mr. Awesome Sweeney, after all.
I imagine the players are sort of in the same place as we are at this point; wishing the whole story would go away. But stuff like Sweeney’s antics fans the fires, rather than letting things settle down.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
Sweeney gave the players an opportunity to stand behind what they did
they didn’t seize it (not that you’d expect them to, in front of everybody). The message has been sent, and now – in theory – it’ll be a more cohesive unit as the clubhouse looks to put all this in the past.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
Well, that could happen...
Or the clubhouse could splinter further into those who think that the two unnamed players did the team a service by trying to help Griffey out the door, and the gritty veterans who think that the unwritten code of the clubhouse was breached, etc etc.
Even independent of this story, Griffey and Sweeney could be the nicest guys in the world; but I have to imagine there is a non-trivial portion of the 25 man roster that is as frustrated as we are about the fact that the team isn’t making simple, easy moves to try to win as many games as possible.
I see Sweeney’s actions as more of a potential wedge than a benefit, but I admit that I’m not a pro athlete and might not fully understand how their minds work.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
Baseball players don't see things the way we do
A lot of the clubhouse loved Jose Vidro right up until the end. In the Mariners’ eyes – I’m guessing – Ken Griffey Jr. and Mike Sweeney are proven, veteran hitters who just need some more time to get things straightened out.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
I imagine that in the main you're right.
I still don’t like it, though.
But unless it is the catalyst for Griffey’s exit, I think I’m with you in hoping for this whole stupid story to go away, and I’m fine with whatever makes that happen short of LaRue losing his job.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
I want the story to go away so that, when the FO makes Junior disappear however they do it
he disappears with some dignity.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
Well, I'd argue that that train has already sailed.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
I don't know that that's true
People can live with underperformance. Griffey’s old. Falling asleep in the clubhouse is a whole other kettle of fish.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
Yes, personally that's why I didn't like it when this story came out.
Sam Regens - May 12, 2010
I guess our version of the Bataan Death March goes on a while longer, in any case.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
Praying so hard for the 60-day DL
It will begin with a tweak…
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
I guess my question is, do we have any reason to even think that is realistic at this point?
Hitting like an NL pitcher: not enough to get Griffey or Sweeney cut.
Falling asleep in the clubhouse during a game: not enough to get Griffey cut.
I think we’re probably stuck with Griffey at this point, at least through whatever the last bobble-head day is.
And that realization is a very depressing one.
Jeff Nye - May 12, 2010
Its only May
There is a lot of baseball left to go.
Edgar for Pres - May 12, 2010
There's a difference between "cut" and "placed on the DL"
They aren’t going to cut him. They aren’t. That’s crazy. But I wouldn’t be surprised to see them do something soon. I’m sure they wanted to give him every opportunity to show some life. He hasn’t, and they won’t put up with this all year long.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
So are we going to see KGJ OF soon?
I think I’d be willing to play him in the OF if that speeds injury. There would be a kind of romanticism to it, like in The Spy Who Came In From The Cold.
You let him go out there and make one last self-sacrificing dive. He gets the catch, comes up lame, and goes on the 60 day with a final moment that at least looks more athletic than geriatric.
A few days of Griffdawg, COF can’t cost us more than 6-7 runs. Another two months of Griffdawg, DH will cost us 10-12.
Bearskin Rugburn - May 12, 2010
I think we need all the help we can get.
Punting OF defense hoping Jr will get hurt, but not knowing when, is not going to help us.
Mariner John - May 12, 2010
This is odd to hear from you.
What Sweeney did is draw a line and permanently cause fracture. The players who he called out will never feel a part of this team as long as Sweeney and Griffey are on it. It is very simple group dynamics. The leader of a group must do things to make the whole inclusive, not exclusive. What Sweeney did is the exact opposite.
Sec 108 - May 12, 2010
I don't know if that's true, though
It’s just as likely, if not moreso, that Sweeney was just teaching a couple younger players a lesson about being in a big league clubhouse. They screwed up, they’ve seen what happens, and now they’re better for it.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
Doesn't that lesson only get learned if the team is good though?
Putting someone in their place on a bad team turns them into Ian Snell.
Sec 108 - May 12, 2010
I can't say
I would assume that Sweeney’s been around long enough to have some idea of what he’s doing.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
I might agree if he had ever been on a good team.
Just because you have personal success at some point in your career does not mean you understand people or how to help and or motivate them.
Sec 108 - May 12, 2010
Heavens I forgot Snell existed
Bearskin Rugburn - May 12, 2010
I don't know. It's hard for me to see Sweeney as a leader because of how bad he is.
I see this as reeking of veteran entitlement, Sweeney has no place. Sweeney and Griffey are taking jobs away from players who actually deserve to be on a big league roster, it wouldn’t surprise me if more than a few players resent them. If they continue to kill the team the clubhouse may fracture the way the Dodgers’ clubhouse did a few years back.
Poochie - May 12, 2010
If they continue to kill the team they won't be around for very long
Figgins is batting .188. Lopez is batting .214. Kotchman is batting .194. Johnson is batting .167. Lots of guys are struggling, and I’m certain that the overwhelming sentiment within the clubhouse is that Griffey and Sweeney are veteran bats who’ll turn it around. We know they’re bad, but players don’t see it the same way. They see what Sweeney and Griffey have done in the past, they see what they do in batting practice, they see what they do in the clubhouse, and they believe in them. Maybe not forever, but probably for now.
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
Even though players are getting smarter you're probably right,
I just have a hard time seeing Sweeney as anything other than the coach’s son.
Poochie - May 12, 2010
Although it's been quite some time since Sweeney and Griffey were good hitters
Poochie - May 12, 2010
Yeah but baseball players are morons
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
That's stereotyping
Dewey N - May 12, 2010
Clearly you haven't heard about the church MMA leagues yet
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/FaithMatters/warriors-christ-fight-gods/story?id=10180581
seattlebruin - May 11, 2010
This amazes me
Bearskin Rugburn - May 12, 2010
Does that fall under Wak's "Being Accountable Belief System"?
Step 1: Player who is subject of newspaper story gives evasive answer regarding truth of the story.
Step 2: Clubhouse meeting to allow designated hugger to threaten physical violence.
Step 3: Black ball reporter who wrote story.
Step 4: Allow starting pitcher to hold up entire press corps (who have deadlines) so he can throw childish tantrum and refuse to speak until reporter who wrote story leaves.
Good to see you have control of the clubhouse, Wak.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
I don't think he threw a tantrum.
No one is reporting that. Lee still gave the post game interview. He showed his solidarity with his teammates in a very reasonable and appropriate way.
Larue really created a no-win situation for everyone. Whether Griffey fell asleep during the game or not is far less relevant than, say, his performance at the plate. However, printing a story about it (with anonymous sources, no less!) serves no purpose other than to drive traffic to his blog. Fair enough, I say, but I’m sure he realized there would be consequences to his self-serving actions.
Kingdomer - May 12, 2010
Its an act!
Griffey, LaRue, and Sweeney put this together to try and ignite the team. They’ll bow out gracefully once we win 10 in a row and watch the Mariners win the World Series.
20 years from now it will be made into a movie.
OceanBird - May 11, 2010
Field of Dreams 2
Jose Lopez's swing - May 11, 2010
Denzel as Griffey, James Gandolfini as Sweeney and Robert Duvall as LaRue.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
They'll be dead!
OceanBird - May 11, 2010
Morgan Freeman as Griffey, Abe Vigoda as Sweeney, then Duvall as LaRue.
thehemogoblin - May 11, 2010
Abe Vigoda probably hits better than Sweeney
or at least he’d draw a walk due to his inability to swing the bat.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
Danny Glover (Roger Murtaugh) would be great as Griffey
if only he (Danny Glover) wasn’t too old. Yikes.
Sam Regens - May 12, 2010
If we're making the movie in 20 years, how 'bout Donald Glover?
Currently playing Troy on Community.
harkening - May 12, 2010
Remember a couple weeks ago when Milton Bradley was being questioned by the media and the music suddenly got turned up?
With Bradley going on the restricted list, maybe this was Griffey’s plan to shift the focus away from him. Of course that doesn’t make any sense for many reasons, but it’s fun to imagine.
Janic - May 11, 2010
Obviously I love watching Lee pitch...
but what a load of horeshit. I’m sure it’s not just him, but stuff like this drives me crazy.
Stormton - May 11, 2010
I wish LaRue and Baker swapped controversial stories.
ThundaPC - May 11, 2010
Yes, I think Baker's schtick deserved this treatment more than LaRue.
Sam Regens - May 12, 2010
So true...
Fearless Frog - May 12, 2010
The comments on that blog make some of the LL game threads look like Shakespeare.
sanford_and_son - May 12, 2010
Is Brandon League Native American?
He just looks bad-ass.
lokiforever - May 11, 2010
Wait, what?
JAH - May 11, 2010
Interesting comparison
No, he’s a mix of Japanese and Hawaiian.
Brian Floyd - May 11, 2010
It's the accoutrements that threw me
The tatoos and the hair mostly
lokiforever - May 11, 2010
Part Japanese.
RustyJohn - May 11, 2010
Hawaiian?
thehemogoblin - May 11, 2010
Uh...he's part Japanese by way of Hawaii.
harkening - May 11, 2010
Jewish.
CapSea - May 12, 2010
Cliff Lee is amazing.
It’s incredible to watch him throw strike after strike, yet sobering to think of him not being on next year’s squad.
Cablinasian - May 11, 2010
That's the worst part.
What a tease :(
Fearless Frog - May 11, 2010
Cliff Lee has pitched 3 games and earned half his salary.
CapSea - May 12, 2010
I second the whole "Lee being even more fun to watch than Felix" thing.
It’s such a treat that it is going to crush me when he’s leaves.
SethGrandpa - May 12, 2010
Griffey at bats compared to Langerhans
It’s so crazy to think which guy is the hall of famer which one was just promoted from AAA. Im actually relieved when Griffey walks now. That’s the best we can hope for now.
FisteeFisterer - May 12, 2010
Agreed!
Jeff Sullivan - May 12, 2010
I always thought that HD ad was silly.
If I don;t have an HD TV or HD cable, how am I going to see what I’m missing. I can’t see it in HD so it looks the same. And now I’m guessing that’s what the joke was.
Hopefulmsfan - May 12, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.