No surprises here, although I'm sure it'll still send many of you into fits:
Mariners RHP Ricky Orta has been placed on waivers for the purpose of granting him his unconditional release
I figured they'd put Orta on the 60-day DL. Shannon Drayer said it wasn't going to be a 60-day DL move. The M's split the middle.
As many have already pointed out on Twitter, the likelihood is that, after Orta clears waivers - which he likely will, since he's a 25 year old AA reliever with a fresh Tommy John scar in his elbow - the team will re-sign him, so we're probably not losing anybody. And even if we do, it's Ricky Orta. It'd be like losing a pushpin behind the desk. Aw, man, I was gonna use that pushpin to hold some shit in place. Now I have to grab another pushpin. Guess I'd better open the drawer with all of the pushpins.
The thing that's getting people upset is that the move doesn't send Mike Sweeney away, but while anyone who wanted that has his heart in the right place, it wasn't going to happen. That'll be addressed separately. If it's ever addressed, which, oh man. I'm holding out hope for a versatile righty/switch-hitter in the Ryan Doumit mold, but whatever happens, we'll cross that bridge when we get there. The corresponding 40-man roster move was never going to involve the unceremonious ejection of Mike Sweeney.
1 recs | 49 comments
I hate this team!
Poochie - May 3, 2010
The feeling seems to be mutual.
JY - May 3, 2010
I hope Ricky Orta uses his surgically repaired elbow to deliver a vicious slap to Mike Sweeney.
abender20 - May 3, 2010
I want Alex Gordon
Yeah, it probably won’t happen. But it’s the Royals.
Cantu Easley Winn - May 3, 2010
I want Kila Ka'aihue
Matt Erickson - May 3, 2010
Well,
That is more fun to say.
Cantu Easley Winn - May 3, 2010
We should just use Kanekoa Texeira more often.
JY - May 3, 2010
Imagine having Kanekoa Texeira and Kila Ka'aihue on the same roster.
Throw in Brandon League, and it’d all just be one big fuckin’ hula!
Matt Erickson - May 3, 2010
Get Tui back and it is haka time
msb - May 3, 2010
I'm not a rugby but you've gotta love
The Haka.
Eyeball Kid - May 3, 2010
I'm pretty sure the All Blacks lost that match.
InSpokane - May 3, 2010
I wouldn't know.
Eyeball Kid - May 3, 2010
Like the Haka, hate Rugby? How's about American Football?
Hawaii does the Haka now too….
marc w - May 3, 2010
That's the first time I've liked something about college football.
Eyeball Kid - May 3, 2010
So does the Evergreen High football team in White Center.
Sec 108 - May 3, 2010
Ah, but look out! The Kiwis have tried to copyright it.
marc w - May 3, 2010
I'll bet Maori love that.
Sec 108 - May 3, 2010
If Sweeney ever goes
You’d preferably want a RH bat that can play LF, DH, and even a little 1B – given the handedness of Langerhans, Bradley, and Griffey.
tait644 - May 3, 2010
Oops
*Kotchman
Not Bradley
tait644 - May 3, 2010
I'd prefer someone that can actually hit first.
Matthew - May 3, 2010
Sure, but if he plays 2B, he's probably not going to be as helpful...
tait644 - May 3, 2010
Versatility seems like a must, though, especially if they stick with the 12-man pitching staff
We want Bradley at DH every day, right? Unless you go high-profile, then you’re looking for a righty who can spell Langerhans against lefties, but also serve as a pinch-hitter/sub for Lopez or the catchers or whoever.
Jeff Sullivan - May 3, 2010
I wish Josh Willingham was still underappreciated by the Nats
Guessing he’s probably too expensive now.
OlSalty - May 3, 2010
Oh goodness I'd love Josh in LF right now
Matt Erickson - May 3, 2010
Cough*XavierNady*Cough
tait644 - May 3, 2010
Willingham is so, so much better
OlSalty - May 3, 2010
Agreed.
He’s also more difficult to acquire.
Besides, Nady’s projected ZiPS RoS wOBA of .353 isn’t too shabby.
tait644 - May 3, 2010
We don't have versatility now.
We don’t have someone who can hit now.
If you can solve both, fantastic, but solve at least one of them.
Matthew - May 3, 2010
Well, as long as Bradley starts more games at DH than LF, I'll be content.
Unfortunately, I have a feeling that’s not going to be the case just yet.
sanford_and_son - May 3, 2010
I have a feeling we're going to get lots of Sweeney sightings in the lineup over the next couple of weeks.
They’ll want to be absolutely sure Sweeney is a pile of crap before releasing him.
eponymous_coward - May 3, 2010
If it's in place of Griffey, fine.
But it’s probably at the expense of Langerhans in the lineup, so BOOOOOOOO.
Fuckmikereilly - May 3, 2010
Langherhans vs. lefties isn't likely to be much more productive than Sweeney.
Though striking out is better than 6-4-3, so while he might not be more productive, he would likely be less detrimental.
Matt Erickson - May 3, 2010
But you also have to factor in Langerhans' defense vs. Bradley's
Jeff Sullivan - May 3, 2010
ZiPS
has Griffey putting up a .308 wOBA the rest of the way, Sweeney a .318, and Langerhans a .313. Basically a wash.
It would basically come down to Langerhans’ D vs. Bradley’s. Not to mention cutting down on the risk of Bradley getting hurt playing the OF and having to live with Griffey or Sweeney at DH.
tait644 - May 3, 2010
Though I agree with the general point,
overall hitting lines are not the same as platoon hitting lines
Matthew - May 3, 2010
How do you mean?
It doesn’t appear that ZiPS’ projections are based on a full remaining season’s worth of PAs.
tait644 - May 3, 2010
The ZiPS projections are based on Griffey and Sweeney filling predominantly platoon-favorable roles
Jeff Sullivan - May 3, 2010
Got it
But it would appear that the point most remains, yes?
tait644 - May 3, 2010
*mostly
tait644 - May 3, 2010
Yes
Jeff Sullivan - May 3, 2010
Sweeney will be replaced when his replacement is here, I suspect.
Not for another backup/bench player.
doublemazaa - May 3, 2010
I like to think that whatever gears have to turn to move Sweeney have started moving
things like this aren’t instant. Lacking internal solutions necessitates going to other teams, and many of the teams that might have something to exchange with us are not necessarily ready to do so. Unless we want Jacobs. Do we want Jacobs? Right.
It’s hard to imagine that the FO thinks it’s ok to make a run at the division with two bench spots taken up by the hitting version of a double play combo. Believe [in] Big [roster moves coming].
Bearskin Rugburn - May 3, 2010
Yeah I pretty much cannot muster even a shred of concern over Ricky Orta
Gihyou - May 3, 2010
Should bring up Carlos Peguero, hell he's hit just as many HRs as the whole team combined
jbpalm - May 3, 2010
No.
From JY’s Minor League Wrap at USSM.
Eyeball Kid - May 3, 2010
Wheeee.
It’s still weird to see myself quoted, but I like that word gets around.
JY - May 3, 2010
He's hit more
Also that would be stupid
Graham MacAree - May 3, 2010
Sadly, I think Sweeney is here to stay for a while
I suspect that Sweeney dodged a bullet on Sunday by not playing. While he may be terrible at hitting the ball now, he seems to have superattuned survival skills, by the way.
After the bad losses and built up frustration it probably caused a “end of the rope, show some results today or you’re gone” type situation, but Sweeney managed to avoid playing (and not getting results like usual), and he didn’t get cut like Byrnes. Byrnes was probably gone anyway, and the Byrnes DFA probably relieved some of that stress to do something about this awful situation.
With some of the stress relieved I don’t expect a super-survivor like Sweeney to be cut so easily.
But as everybody is saying, the Byrnes (and Tui) move is really not enough to salvage the team’s chances.
Another tough thing is that Sweeney does probably have more left in the bat than Junior, but Junior can’t be cut, so it complicates the situation a little.
Sam Regens - May 3, 2010
Pushpins!
Ha-ha! Jeff!
I would rec my post if I could just because it reminded me to read your post like three times already. Excellent stuff…
fortyniners - May 3, 2010
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.