SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

The Three Most Important Bits Of Mariner News You Will Read Today

1) According to many of the players, Mike Sweeney is the nicest man in baseball. Of course, according to many of the players, Ken Griffey Jr. was treated unfairly and should've kept starting, which may lead one to question the opinions of the players. But I shouldn't be snarky, because honestly I haven't heard a bad thing said about Sweeney's personality since he came to Seattle, or - now that I think about it - ever. He really is that nice. Mike Sweeney babysat Rob Johnson's kids. Sweeney should print the player poll out, wrap it around his finger, and wear it like the World Series ring he's never going to win.

2) Jesus Colome cleared waivers and became a free agent.

Wakamatsu didn’t think Colomé would make it through the waivers process without being claimed.

"Not a chance," he said. "You’re talking about a guy throwing 97-98 miles per hour with major league experience."

3) Ian Snell hasn't been designated for assignment or released yet. Wak says they'll make a decision on Snell's rotation status tomorrow. His rotation status is that he's out of the rotation. I mean, that much is obvious. There's no way he's still in there. So I'm kind of annoyed that he hasn't been sent packing. But then, maybe the team is just waiting until it finds a suitable replacement before giving Snell his walking papers. That's what I'm going to hope for. I'm going to hope that the M's are currently scouting the player market to find an interesting arm to take Snell's place. My suggestion for an interesting arm who might be a bigger part of the Mariner future than Ian Snell: anyone.

Update: Dave reminds me that Fister comes off the DL next week, so the M's might just be waiting for that.

0 recs  |  94 comments

Comments

Aw god dammit Matthew
But it's adorable!
This reinforces my opinion

that Wak is a terrible judge of what exactly is major league talent. Not that it needed reinforcing.

Wow, I can't believe it.

I’m responsible for two of the three biggest news items of the day. As for the first one, I could say something, but it might get me into trouble.

Go for it, champ.
Let me get you an alternate account real quick
Ryan D?

No, wait, that’s too obvious.

How about R. Divish?

Diane Rivish
Simpsons!
This has a roughly 50% chance of being an accurate reply to any comment on this site.
Simpsons!
Darn it.
He said 50%
I know, that's why I said darn it,

because this was one of the 50% of posts that it didn’t work for.

Now you're on the trolley!
I was on the trolley all along.

I was joking.

Buster Olney.
Whatever, we're a blog.

Zero journalistic accountability!

I think Jeff heard my rant about it while I was sipping a PBR tallboy the other night

Jeff, you’ll be happy to know, I had a few Blue Moons the other night. And Shiner last night. This team is driving me straight to Schick Schadel.

I know I've heard the rant before

I just don’t know if I’ve ever heard it sober. As for the other point, I’m so proud of you that tears are welling up.

Players think Griffey should have been starting. Wak is shocked Colome didn't get claimed. Somebody is trying to decide if Snell should still start.

Oh, THAT’s why we’re in last place.

Actually, pretty much none of those are responsible for any part of us being in last place.
But hey almost
Almost?
I don't know what I meant
Hey guys.

I’m like, right here.

I was referring to me
Stupidity as a whole has to be held accountable somewhere.

None of those items specifically, of course.

1) Pretty much all players are kind of dumb when it comes to understanding baseball

2) Jesus Colome was never really that big of a problem
3) Just because they haven’t made anything official doesn’t mean they haven’t made a decision

Now that I understand what you meant my comment seems kind of needless
I wasn't bringing up anything new.

Still just in awe that Wak is a fanboy of his guys.

This has been covered

but find me a manager, ever, that didn’t have irrational player preferences.

You won’t.

See Mike Scioscia and Jeff Mathis, for instance.
Would you mind choosing your words more carefully in the future then?

We’re up to our eyebrows in trying to keep people from overreacting and/or assigning blame where it doesn’t belong. It doesn’t help if posters make comments that appear serious that are actually disingenuous.

Im genuous in calling the organization stupid.

Disingenuous in being offended.

You actually think the organization is stupid?

Seriously?

I can playfully give this team a hard time.

Just as they have a hard time playing.

Yeah, we're up to me!
I see what you did there!

And I liked it.

You could have expressed that same sentiment by simply reccing the comment.
Griffey, Colome, and Snell being terrible have certainly been contributing factors though
I'd prefer not to have to do an elaborate interpretative exercise to get to the meaning of people's comments.

A huge proportion of LL’s commenting standards revolve around making things readable for others.

I wasn't disagreeing with you
Today. Is not my day.
Bedard is going to try another simulated game on Tuesday.

Important piece of information #4, again brought to you via Divish.

I care so much less now, but I really want something interesting to watch once Lee leaves.

Yay Erik

We should sign him to a lifetime contract for some reason.

We should just appoint him Direction of Press Operations.
I'd give him Wakefield's deal
His lifetime or his shoulder's?
I'm a little afraid he'll never actually show up

I think I’m gonna place my interest in our younger players. Saunders, Carp, Tui …. Mostly Saunders, actually. Probably entirely Saunders.

Before this year I viewed Tui as a decent prospect

Now, while nothing has necessarily changed much in his value, I just wish he’d fucking go away

I hope he never does, but I hope I always think that he's close
That sounds like borderline torture
It falls in line with my hypothesis that I would prefer to never win, but always think we're looking up
Is this akin to the philosophy that never setting goals for yourself is worthwhile, because you never get disappointed?
No

I want to have goals and fall just shy of achieving them, because I don’t want to deal with a reality in which the goals I set for myself turn out to be disappointing.

A Mariners WS probably would be disappointing.

No one would watch, then everyone would pretend it didn’t happen.

So far so good, right?
It's all about Saunders

Unless they go and do something stupid like call up Ackley or Pineda.

I don't think a call-up to Tacoma would be unwarranted.
Sorry - I meant a call-up to Seattle
I thought this was a sly joke about Saunders getting called up from the Mariners to the Rainiers.
By the way, I expect that to be the headline whenever we send Olson back down or whoever

Olson called up to AAA

I will take credit for this cleverness.

I will even give you 15% if you don’t tell anyone.

September.

Pineda will need to be added in the offseason anyway. I suspect one of the reasons we’re still operating with a 38-man roster is because the team is still deciding whether they want to add him later in the year just to see what he has.

You don't think they shut him down come September?
They might.

The thing is, there’s not a whole lot of reason to be worried at the moment. They’ve kept him to an extremely strict pitch count and nonetheless there have only been two starts all season he’s gone fewer than six innings.

For me, it would be not so much the inning count as the stress of the innings, and for the most part, he’s been cruising. I wouldn’t expect him to be used a lot mind you, but he could get a look.

Michael Pineda has never sucked and I love that about him.
He wasn't impressive in the DSL.

But he hasn’t ever sucked, no.

If they hold him back, I won't be disappointed. Just a bit spooked by his injury history
There's not a whole lot of reason to be.

It was one instance of a balky elbow, and after coming back he showed neither a loss of velocity nor a loss of command.

The Mariners have been incredibly proactive of late with their top pitchers at holding them back the instant their arm starts to act up.

Chance Pineda is starting for the M's in April 2011?
30%
It may be early as hell, but can we make a preemptive strike on pinata jokes?
Please.

I’m sick of the expectations a large section of the fanbase holds that a prospect has to light the league on fire in his debut and is a complete failure or illusion otherwise.

How does that relate to a pinata?
Pinatas start out great and only get better
Clearly thought this out much better than I did.
I just fucking love pinatas
Nothing really.

It’s a lingering response from a response on another blog that goes unmentioned here about how Michael Saunders was never going to be a major leaguer, based off the input of a bad debut.

If Pineda struggles early on, people are going to call him Pinata and ignore his entire track record to this point.

The longer he goes unnoticed and ignored the harder he's gonna hit the league.
Like Fister!

Wait…

All I would expect is 15 K's.
.

Yes, I will rec this.
It seems to me that Rob Johnson has to be the 2nd most liked person in the clubhouse.
Was Wak a shittier catcher than Rob Johnson?
How could anyone be a shittier catcher than Rob Johnson? Seriously, how?

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.