SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Lookout Landing

On The Effect Of Measuring Russell Branyan's Monster Home Run

This is always awkward for the pitcher

Jim McIsaac - Getty Images

This is always awkward for the pitcher

Early Saturday, on a 3-1 pitch from Javier Vazquez, Russell Branyan did this.

Newyankeestadium_2010_3458_medium

In case you missed it, you can watch the video here. In short, Branyan put his uppercut swing on a fresh, oven-baked, steaming elk meatball and became the first player in new Yankee Stadium's limited history to reach right field's fourth deck.

It was a dinger worthy of adjectives. Mariners.com describes it as "mammoth". Geoff Baker described it as "epic". Other people described it with other words. Some home runs just barely get out. Other home runs settle five or ten rows back. Homers like those can be forgotten as quickly as they leave, and you move on to the next hitter like a regular Cliff Lee. Homers like Branyan's, though, immediately impress and linger on the mind long after the end of the inning. Homers like Branyan's are feats of extraordinary strength. They're watched with mouths agape, and the mouths remain open for longer than just the ball's flight. Homers like Branyan's render the game a secondary concern. "Yeah, I was there. The Yankees won. But did you see that one dinger?"

We remember these things. We may not be as enchanted by home runs as we were 20 years ago, but the long home run is still very much in fashion. It's a big part of what kept Richie Sexson popular until he became unpopular and bad. We love to watch guys hit the ball off of windows and into upper decks. We love to watch these blasts, and we love to estimate their distances. Said Baker, on Branyan's:

But this shot by Branyan was epic. No measurement involved. But to say it was close to 500 feet or more would not be an overstatement. It was a rocket.

Of course, Hit Tracker Online is a thing that exists. Hit Tracker Online updates with home run distances every day, and yesterday morning, it pegged Branyan's home run with a distance of 440 feet.

Now, 440 feet is a long home run. It's the third-longest distance of the year for any Mariner hitter, behind blasts by Eliezer Alfonzo and Milton Bradley. The league average is about 397, and 440 is well towards the top of the season-long list.

But 440 doesn't have the majestic ring to it that you get from 470, 480, or even the hallowed 500. Josh Hamilton owns the longest home run of the season to date, and his had an additional 45 feet. 440 is nowhere close to the league-leading or nearly-league-leading measurement we thought we were in for two days ago when Branyan reached rarefied air.

And I'm not gonna lie to you - when I saw that, I was kind of disappointed. I like big homers. I like big numbers. I like big hitters capable of generating big homers with big numbers. And when I watched the video of Branyan going deep, I thought we were in for a really big number. Turns out it was smaller than I expected. And to some degree, that cheapened the experience. "Oh, it only went 440? I guess I shouldn't have been as impressed as I was."

That, of course, is totally wrong. One's experience of watching a home run shouldn't be cheapened retroactively by some revelation that comes later on, short of finding out that the pitcher intentionally grooved a pitch. But here I am, a man less awe-struck than before, all thanks to the wonders of knowledge.

I guess it might just be time for me to accept the fact that distance traveled has become a part of my dinger evaluation checklist. Used to be that I could just watch one and know. Now the math has forced its way into the picture, and given how much I love using Hit Tracker Online, I don't think I'm getting it out. What once was all visual is now something like two parts visual and one part actual distance. This is my new reality.

I guess, at the end of the day, at least this team's finally given me a chance to think about dingers.

3 recs  |  28 comments

Comments

I think those measurements are flawed.
I hate how the cameras didn't try to follow the ball, they just kinda gave up.

Or just lost it because IT WAS SO EPICLY MAMMOTH!!!!

YES network tracked it alright.
I forgot it's also three parts outfielders standing still
And those are the best parts.
The problem with the reported distance though.

Is that the seats stopped it. I have no idea what other parks are like when it comes to distance in right field but I would think in certain parks where the upper deck is lower or farther back, that ball travels much farther. Then again, I suppose that argument could be used for most well-hit home runs and the deck did stop it so that’s that.

Jeff didn't list the "reported distance"

He listed Hit Tracker’s distance. There’s a gigantic difference.

Explanation!

http://hittrackeronline.com/howitworks.php

In that case, forget I asked. Thank you for the link.

It must’ve been because it was hit so high then because man it looked farther than that.

Didn't see this linked so

Branyan specific analysis:
http://hittrackeronline.com/branyanhomer.php

Now I am no longer skeptical.
Very nice, thanks
Not all 440's are created equal.

The camera man was looking for the ball… it was just two frames above his aim. Branyan’s ball paused a moment at it’s apex to take in the view of the Manhattan skyline. I read there were sear marks from re-entry.

I'm skeptical on the 440 measurement.
I kind of am too, but I have no basis
How's this for a basis.

See link again and click the little “range rings” radio button right above the graphic. The right field fence in about 300 feet away. Those rings are to scale, otherwise they wouldn’t be circular arcs. The landing spot according to the rings is about 3/4 the way from 400 feet to 450 feet. The altitude according to that chart is 105 feet high. That’s not a 440 foot shot.

I think HT online’s calculations are busted.

Wait, I'm wrong.

The blue dot is the actual point of landing, the green is the projected point.

The problem is Branyan hits them at an 80 degree angle

What they should measure is not just horizontal distance traveled, but actual distance traveled, i.e. the length of the arc.

According to HT, it was hit at a 29.3 degree angle.
I was joking about 80 degrees, but

that’s disappointing. I went to the main page and tried sorting all the 2010 home runs by elev. angle, apex, and speed off bat, and his hit wasn’t top 100 in any of them. Too bad.

"at the end of the day", you say?
I like it as an expression
The problem lies in the location of the 4th deck. It's not even 400ft from the plate.

It was high, and probably past it’s apex. It it reached the upper deck at, say, 385 ft, it will fall rather quickly, resulting in “only” 440 ft. But that 29.3 angle troubles me.

I look at home run distances as more of an after-the-fact curiosity than something that shapes my opinion of a homer.

I saw Mark McGwire’s longest home run (545 feet) and I wasn’t as impressed as I was with Branyan’s. It’s all about the moment for me and Branyan’s homers are always something special to watch.

Too high
One of my favorite movie quotes.
Interesting bit of memorabilia for the guy who caught it

The woman in front of him was encouraging him to throw the ball back, but he kept it. Good for him. Even if I’m a committed Yankee fan, I’m not letting go of the first 4th-deck homer ever at the new Yankee Stadium. There’s some historical value there.

Dingers like this are so pretty.

The way Branyan loads up on the ball is really fun to watch, and he’s so fast getting the bat around on this one with that 111 off the bat. Beastly.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.