Mariner games have become mercifully short — by baseball standards, they are still an extraordinary long time to take a shower for — the last few years as the offense has collectively decided that scoring runs is just really hard and they probably shouldn't bother trying anyway. It wasn't always that way obviously and back when the team did employ a bunch of selfish run-scorers, Mariners games were some of the longest in baseball. Back in November when I revisited the subject of average games lengths by starting pitcher, I included a graph of average game durations by team featuring the already known fact that the Mariners had the shortest time of any team in 2011.
During the prep for that post, I made a graph of that average game duration but plotted it exclusively for the Mariners and broke it up by season over their existence. Two months passed and I apparently forgot or deliberately did not post it. Well, now I am.
Unsurprisingly, when offense goes up so too do game times and with the recent and prolonged spate of apathetic offense, the Mariners have been in a period of significantly shorter games than the rest of the league. What I hadn't thought of before however was just how much extra time saved it all added up to. So I thought of that and then I added it all up because I am a human being in possession of basic math skills, a interest in sometimes trivial facts and a copy of Microsoft Excel™.
The 2011 Mariners averaged 166 minutes per game while the other 29 teams in baseball averaged 177 minutes per game. Without the rounding, it totalled (over 162 games) 1,859 fewer minutes of baseball than average. That's a smidgen under 31 hours! A crazy person with nothing better to do than watch every inning of Mariners baseball in 2011 saved 31 hours that he or she could spend doing those things that ranked below "watching the Mariners" on his or her life priority list. Here's a brief sample of some of the activities that could have been accomplished with that free time:
-Infected roughly 5% of London's population with a violence-inducing virus.
-Run the Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc® if you weren't so hideously unfit.
-Stopped 1.3 massively complex and conspiratorial terrorist plots aimed at either detonating a nuclear bomb in LA, meltdowning a nuclear reactor in LA or detonating many nuclear bombs in LA.
-Slowly rotated in sync with asteroid 1159 Granada.
-Replaced about 0.3% of your liver.
-Easily won Deathrace 2011.
By the way, if anyone out there is a Red Sox fan of similar temperament to this hypothetical Mariner fan, then congratulations, you watched 48 additional hours of baseball over the 2011 calendar year and you didn't even get the playoffs out of it. Humanity is grateful because you probably would have spent those two days interacting with other people while being an insufferable Red Sox fan.
9 recs | 32 comments
Love to see an average runs per game overlay.
sofa_king - January 10, 2012 via mobile
I wonder what the absolute minimum time per game is.
Measured from the official start time, to eliminate variance of special ceremonies, first pitches, pre-game video, etc. Add in minimum time between half-innings (is there such a thing?), 7th inning stretch (if it’s any longer than other mid-inning time) and average time pitcher takes to deliver pitches.
Assume no injury delay or pitching changes; home starter goes 9 innings and away starter goes 8 (‘cause obviously, in shortest game possible, M’s win). Throw out the scenario of “Safeco Field roof breaks and we get first-ever rainout”.
Hell, to get ever goofier, one could even assume the home pitcher threw a no-hitter and the opposing pitcher had a no-no until the first pitch of the bottom of the 9th (walkoff home run). And that every out was a lineout, fly out or popup on the first pitch.
I’m just trying to reconcile how the shortest 9-inning game in ML history took only 51 minutes. And still managed a score of 6-1! Has our modern game, with the bells and whistles and video and hat tricks and boat races and pitching changes, gone too far?
Personally I love a 3-hour game, because I love relaxing at the park and not having to be anywhere… it’s my chance to unplug… so I don’t get the rabid calls for shortening the game through weird rules and such.
Chris_FB - January 10, 2012
The game is definitely different now; I think the shortest possible game today is still probably twice that.
I would be interested to see the difference in length between televised and non-televised games in the early 90s.
I’m also wondering what exactly happened between 1984 and 1987 that established what appears to be a new “normal” of game length at about 172 minutes.
Two Rs and Two Ls - January 10, 2012
This is where I'd love to know where to find any league requirements around commercial time for tv/radio deals
Chris_FB - January 10, 2012
I believe the MLB mandate is 2:05 between innings for regular season and 2:35 during the playoffs
Although those could be older numbers.
pdb - January 10, 2012
So at least 18 minutes and 45 seconds of not-game, guaranteed, in every game.
Chris_FB - January 10, 2012
yep
Which isn’t that far out of line for other sports, really; it’s just that in other sports (except the NFL), there’s a lot more continuous action.
pdb - January 10, 2012
Twice that sounds about right
I could swear I’ve seen a 1-0 or 2-0 complete game shutout thrown by Mark Buehrle that checked in solidly under two hours.
Aly Edge - January 10, 2012
The M's played a game against Mark Buehrle's White Sox that lasted one hour and 39 minutes
April 16, 2005.
I love a shortish game – 2.5 hr or so is about right. I have nothing against a three hour game, as such, but there is so much time wasted in MLB games that things could be tightened up a bit without radical rule changes and nobody would really notice.
pdb - January 10, 2012
The fact that he worked quickly was the only attribute about Ryan Franklin that I did not detest.
Goose - January 10, 2012
But he more than made up for that when he let a man reach base
And then threw to 1B again and again and again and again.
(Has anybody graphed number of attempted pick-off throws vs successes? Franklin would have to be near the bottom)
J0SER - January 10, 2012
If I remember correctly Franklin had agreed to not shake off Dan Wilson
But that was awhile back and I can’t even remember where I got that, had to be the radio announcers as I was working that night. If it’s even accurate
Kermit. - January 10, 2012
God dammit I have got to start reading the whole page before I comment
Aly Edge - January 10, 2012
Under 200 total pitches in that game (197)
If we’re looking for a theoretical minimum, it could be faster. Silva had a 74-pitch complete game win back in ’05, so you could probably shave it down to 170-180 pitches and get under 1.5 hours.
ubelmann - January 10, 2012
Quck Mark Buerhle Retrosheet Research!
Three other games under 2 hours:
1:50, Chicago @ Toronto (Halladay), 2007
1:53, Oakland (Mulder) @ Chicago, 2003
1:53, Minnesota (Liriano) @ Chicago, 2005
Two Rs and Two Ls - January 10, 2012
Away pitcher should throw a no-no except for a home run at any time OTHER than the 9th
You added an unneeded break between innings in there to get to the bottom of the ninth.
OJsApprentice - January 10, 2012
whoopsie - that probably saved a good 5 minutes or so right there
Chris_FB - January 10, 2012
I watch Mariners' baseball to kill time and blot out all rational thought.
The droning voice of Mike Blowers is particularly helpful in this regard.
ignacio - January 10, 2012
When we're kickin' ass time just flies by
Poochie - January 10, 2012
36 of those extra 48 hours consisted of watching this for twenty- five minutes between each pitch:
ThomasG - January 10, 2012
Thank you for saving us from that this year, Philly
Red Sox v. M’s in 2012: 9 times
Phillies v. M’s in 2012: 0 times
Chris_FB - January 10, 2012
Josh Beckett feels unloved right now.
Big Jared - January 11, 2012
Good, then he can learn to throw the fucking ball in a decent timeframe or cry in the corner.
Aussie Mariner - January 11, 2012
You are a genius
seattlebruin - January 10, 2012
Yep
good stuff. Interesting to look out.
McCutchenIsTheTruth - January 10, 2012
The 2011 Seattle Mariners - making your life .3% more efficient
seattlebruin - January 10, 2012
That's gonna look awesome on a bumpersticker
pdb - January 10, 2012
The Seattle Mariners:
You gotta love those guys (since they let you get to bed at a reasonable hour).
Ballard Erik - January 10, 2012
It's crazy how much lower we are than average
when you think about how much time was spent watching balls sail that were hit off of Anthony Vasquez in his 7 starts.
Ballard Erik - January 10, 2012
No, it's not that crazy how lower than average the Mariners are.
In anything, really.
ThomasG - January 10, 2012
I think I would need far more than 31 hours to finish a Death Race
MT Olson - January 10, 2012
This may be my favorite article this year.
I am thankful that while the M’s have been terrible, they at least got done fast.
Henry Valz - January 10, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Lookout Landing to post a comment.